> On 14 Feb 2017, at 19:53, Kristian Fiskerstrand
> <kristian.fiskerstr...@sumptuouscapital.com> wrote:
>
> Trust level is not a property of the public key, it is stored out of
> band (in the local trustdb)
Ah ok. Thanks.
Marko
---
Marko Bauhardt
https://keybase.io/
r key will not change it any further.
This was the case except of the trust level.
>
> HTH,
>
> Peter.
Thank you. Very helpful.
Marko
---
Marko Bauhardt
https://keybase.io/mbauhardt
GPG Key ID: 53192101
GPG Fingerprint: DC0F E851 82A3 72E3 7FE1 ACDB 970C FD47 5319 2
ver? Again i get no error
message while sending the key, everything looks good. But the key will not
change online. The representation online will stay the same.
---
Marko Bauhardt
https://keybase.io/mbauhardt
GPG Key ID: 53192101
GPG Fingerprint: DC0F E851 82A3 72E3 7FE1 ACDB 970C FD
__
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
---
Marko Bauhardt
marko.bauha...@mailbox.org <mailto:marko.bauha...@mailbox.org>
GPG Key ID: 53192101
GPG Fingerprint: DC0F E851 82A3 72E3 7FE1 ACDB 970C FD47 531
>
> I don't think it has really been documented. I guess the source code *is* the
> documentation.
;). Understand hehe.
Thanks a lot for all your answers!
Marko
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
do with
that particular key, only in case the GPG key is located on a smartcard?
But if the key is not on the smart card this corresponding key can be use to
sign/enc/auth?
I can not really find some detailed documentation of the `private-keys-v1.d`
folder. Do you have some docu?
t
to decrypt anything encrypted to any secret key you hold,
> regardless of whether the certificates that contain those keys are
> valid, revoked, expired, or whatever.
Nice. This is an important answer.
>
> make sense?
>
Yes, totally. Thx for explanation.
---
Marko Bauhardt
marko.
. Any comments about his folder?
As i said before, i want to not save any key on my machine. And for now i’m not
sure if i reach this goal because this new key sounds like it is a private key.
Thanks
Marko
---
Marko Bauhardt
marko.bauha...@mailbox.org <mailto:marko.bauha...@mailbox.org>
to this email with that specific key
* i can not send a signed messages with that email and specific key
Can i still decrypt emails with my key sent to this revoked email?
thx
marko
---
Marko Bauhardt
marko.bauha...@mailbox.org <mailto:marko.bauha...@mailbox.org>
PGP Key ID: 53192101
PGP Finge
> On 29 Jan 2017, at 15:18, Andrew Gallagher <andr...@andrewg.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 29 Jan 2017, at 10:39, Marko Bauhardt <marko.bauha...@mailbox.org
> <mailto:marko.bauha...@mailbox.org>> wrote:
>
>> Now one year later. My ssh subkey is expired. B
the ssh-agent instead of the gpg-agent?
Any idea or comment?
---
Marko Bauhardt
marko.bauha...@mailbox.org <mailto:marko.bauha...@mailbox.org>
Key ID: 53192101
Fingerprint: DC0F E851 82A3 72E3 7FE1 ACDB 970C FD47 5319 2101
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using G
s intuition, not science.
Make totally sense. I will try that out.
Marko
--
Marko Bauhardt
marko.bauha...@mailbox.org
Bitte schützen Sie meine und Ihre Privatsphäre, nutzen Sie PGP
Please protect my and your privacy, use PGP
Key ID: 53192101
Fingerprint: DC0F E851 82A3 72E3 7FE1 ACDB 970C FD47
ng
> that)
I know that. But i saw not really an advantage to using the gpg agent, except
of the using of TTL’s for keys i want to add.
What are your points to use the gpg-agent instead the ssh-agent?
Thanks for your comments
Marko
--
Marko Bauhardt
marko.bauha...@mailbox.org
Bitte schü
` will fail when my GPG subkey is expired?
Has anyone experience with GPG and ssh authentication?
Should i use the gpg-agent instead of the ssh-agent?
Thanks
Marko
--
Marko Bauhardt
marko.bauha...@mailbox.org
Bitte schützen Sie meine und Ihre Privatsphäre, nutzen Sie PGP
Please protect my and your
>
> You may use this notation to force the use of this subkey. However, an
> OpenPGP key(block) always consists of a primary key and optional ant
> number of subkeys.
Ok.
> The transfer format does only allow sending of
> entire OpenPGP key(block)s.
>
Ok, thx. This was not clear for me.
> You can either upload the whole public set or none of it, you can't or
> at least I know of no way of uploading only the public part of the sub keys.
As far as i know it is possible to upload a sub key via the id of the sub key
ending with the exclamation mark `!`.
I mean does it make sense
Hi,
i have a keyring which contains a master key for certification and 3 sub keys,
one for encryption, one for sign and the third one for authentication.
So my question is which key should i upload to a key server. I mean should i
upload the master key id via `gpg —send-key EMAIL` / `gpg
17 matches
Mail list logo
