Re: How to send a signed git patch

Daniel Cerqueira via Gnupg-users wrote: > I want to send my po translation of GnuPG. > Werner told me to send a signed git patch to a list. > So, I signed my git commit with my GnuPG key. And when I do `git > format-patch master` the created patch does not have this signature.

Re: Pinentry problem with different home dir

nf > should show/log an error. I guess I'd really like that to just happen with some --I-really-want-isolated-gnupg option. -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works| network

Re: YubiKey/OpenPGP card connection issues for non-root user

? > How do I fix that? > I am happy to substitute the udev rules with a timer, or to call some > command to give permissions every time I want to use the YubiKey or the > OpenPGP card. I just would like the whole process to be more reliable. > Currently, it’s extrem

Re: "gpg --card-edit" with multiple card readers (Yubikey)

Andrew Gallagher wrote: > The yubikey performs cryptography on the device, but does have a small > amount of flash memory to store the private key material. The yubikey > does not provide any method to copy the private key material back off > that storage, it can only be overwritt

Re: "gpg --card-edit" with multiple card readers (Yubikey)

ecovered by outsiders. > This is not possible with a Yubikey. If you want the same (sub)keys on > multiple devices you must generate them on your laptop and copy them to > each device in turn, remembering not to delete until you’re done. okay, so in this case we are

Re: "gpg --card-edit" with multiple card readers (Yubikey)

Juanjo via Gnupg-users wrote: >> should eventually describe the environment. >> > >> > Yes please. > Could it go into a wiki page or something that people >> can comment on and/or > amend? >> >> feel free to open a page with the info that Werner has already given >> o

Re: "gpg --card-edit" with multiple card readers (Yubikey)

Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote: > On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 14:22, Juanjo said: >> This works fine with a single Yubikey, but we wanted to have more than >> one connected at the same time in order to batch-configure them and >> even to try to use multiple SSH key authentication in sp

Re: ADK's

Andrew Gallagher wrote: > The only way that a company would end up archiving a password reset > email encrypted to an ADK would be if an employee was using their work > email address for password resets. If using their work email for this > purpose is inadvisable, then it is inadv

Re: ADK's

encrypted today, but we can hope. Many companies with forced proxis are starting to realize that they become liable when they store banking login cookies. Anyway, I think senders need to be made mildly aware that it's occuring, and I think they should be allowed to pick a specific A

Re: ADK's

Jacob Bachmeyer via Gnupg-users wrote: > ADKs seem particularly valuable to me as a solution to the "group inbox" > problem that avoids actually sharing private key material: simply > attach encryption subkeys for all recipients to the "group inbox" > certificate. This requires

Re: Management of background services with systemd

David Joaquín Shourabi Porcel wrote: > I am researching GnuPG for my employer. We will stick with the old > release series 2.2 at first, because few Linux distributions package > 2.3 or 2.4 yet. However, I'm studying newer versions and recent > developments to ease our future upgr

Re: Mastodon account, good server?

It's not the technical work or the system resources that are really the challenge (I think that there is plenty of technical volunteers). It's the promises about moderation and other softer human resources that seem to really be the limit for running Mastodon instances. Maybe FSF.org will do some

Re: Does the PGP public key at https://www.washingtonpost.com/anonymous-news-tips/

Michael Richardson wrote: > Yeah, the marketing department screwed it up, and should have put > on it. It suggests that it has never really been used. I sent an encrypted email to the newspaper, pointing them at this thread, and the problems they have. signature.asc Descriptio

Re: Does the PGP public key at https://www.washingtonpost.com/anonymous-news-tips/

Francesco Ariis wrote: > Hello Jay, > Il 05 agosto 2022 alle 17:28 Jay Sulzberger via Gnupg-users ha scritto: >> Does the PGP public key at >> https://www.washingtonpost.com/anonymous-news-tips/ work? > It gets copied in a weird way (i.e. some characters that should be >

Re: Does the PGP public key at https://www.washingtonpost.com/anonymous-news-tips/

The key on that page is line wrapped. If I replace the right spaces with newlines, then it seems to work import okay. -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- Version: Mailvelope v4.6.0 Comment: https://www.mailvelope.com xsDNBGLr60kBDAC7/dyy27fxfbaE1Ss13QI9li93YePYFNjLW1JonvNcsmN+ ncuA5u8HZJQFo9ICty

Re: GnuPG 2.2.36 released

Todd Zullinger via Gnupg-users wrote: > It's frustrating that the releases are signed with a cipher that cannot > be verified on a reasonably popular distro. At least, multiple signatures could be made. -- Michael Richardson. o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )

Re: (my) E-mail address not found by 'https://keys.openpgp.org'

you may not have completed this verification step, or something went wrong there. - Michael attachment.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: [Announce] A New Future for GnuPG

rstood much, but you did it looks as if you did it the right way. Sit back, fold your hands on your belly and smile. And Cheerio ! Michael. -- Je ne réponds que avec retard aux messages non-signés ou non-chiffrés (en absence du “Content-Type: signed” ou “encrypted”. Messages publics (listes etc.

Re: ขอบคุณครับ.

42 :) Am 24. Mai 2021 17:51:19 MESZ schrieb "นายสุชัย วรรณกิจวรกุล via Gnupg-users" : >-- >ขอขอบพระคุณมากครับ > >ขอแสดงความนับถือ > > >นายสุชัย วรรณกิจวรกุล >นายสุชัยชนะกิจวัลกุล. >wonsuc...@gmail.com >086-4227317 -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Gerät mit K-9 Mail gesendet. __

Re: Gnupg-users logo

no idea what the ``right'' capitalization is supposed to be! - - Michael -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEau/tqk0YEkf4B7L/I018NiIuApUFAl827iQACgkQI018NiIu ApVSwA/+OhY4PVf0AChQ3mFr9CgWWA9uHzQwbmCKiAcEKRFRjWPutgEIRKYIyqvk TR5pKE8zHxYQZDerAzicTQHxQnjiGLLqLEWZT59jBs9qD/tY5bOiQRxqI3/lu

Gnupg-users logo

ng to make any promises about it being a stunning work of art or anything, but I figured I would share it here just in case anyone else might find it useful for some reason or other. Here it is: https://0x0.st/iYuB.jpg - - Michael Meyer -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEau/tq

Re: Why ...

On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 18:08:22 +0100 Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users writes, and having writ moves on: > ... do old established GnuPG users always have to be so rude Are you sure it is *all* and *always*? Mike Yetto -- "Persecution is not an original feature in any religion; but it is always the s

Re: Slightly OT - mobile OpenPGP usage

Hi Chris, On 25.08.19 21:22, Chris Narkiewicz via Gnupg-users wrote: > Shortly, I know only one combination that provides reasonable > use experience on mobile. > > Android + K-9 Mail + OpenKeychain + YubiKey with NFC. Do you know a good guide for setting this up? Best wi

Re: I deleted 80 % of my keyring, but my keybox file isn't shrinking

from 4.600 to 1.000 keys: >> But the keybox file didn't get any smaller: You might try exporting your keys and importing them into a completely new pubring. Best Michael signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Gnupg-users

Re: wrong gpg-agent version running?

Hi Teemu, On 11.07.19 17:34, Teemu Likonen wrote: > Michael Kesper [2019-07-11T17:15:19+02] wrote: > >> I'd consider it a bug if updating a package does not trigger reloading >> all necessary services. > > We have not been discussing about Debian package upgrade. T

Re: wrong gpg-agent version running?

Hi Teemu, On 11.07.19 17:11, Teemu Likonen wrote: > Michael Kesper [2019-07-11T16:45:06+02] wrote: > >> Did anyone open a bug with Debian (best with proposing a fix)? > > What bug? We have not seen a bug in this message thread. I'd consider it a bug if updating a p

Re: wrong gpg-agent version running?

gt; [Service] > ExecStart=/usr/local/bin/gpg-agent --supervised > ExecReload=/usr/local/bin/gpgconf --reload gpg-agent Did anyone open a bug with Debian (best with proposing a fix)? Bye Michael signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: New keyserver at keys.openpgp.org - what's your take?

x27;t find it contestable that e-mail addresses do > constitute personal data. Definitely. If you can identify someone by data, it IS personal data. As many email addresses are firstname.lastname@ they are already directly identifiable. See also: https://www.gdpreu.org/the-regulation/key-con

Re: GnuPG and SSH_AUTH_SOCK value

Hi Daniel, On 28.06.19 10:23, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Fri 2019-06-28 10:04:44 +0200, Michael Kesper wrote: >> On 23.06.19 12:21, Matthias Apitz wrote: >>> I'm used to use 'startx' and ~/.xinitrc to bring up Xorg+KDE: >> >> This makes your set

Re: GnuPG and SSH_AUTH_SOCK value

le: https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/45908 Bye Michael signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

RE: Ok this is a stupid questions

;t do it". Yes I know. What I am looking to do is to >be able to understand why it goes into this race condition instead of erroring >out. My ask of the gpg listers, is has anyone ever seen this behavior? From: Michael Holly Sent: Monday, February 25, 2019 8:14 AM To: gnupg-users@gn

Ok this is a stupid questions

n. Thanks Michael ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: Problems while joining/leaving this mailing list

On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 18:26:39 +0100 Ralph Seichter writes, and having writ moves on: >I have written to the list owners but did not receive a reply yet, and >I also wonder if anybody else has experienced this: > >I tried to subscribe with n...@dom.ain and unsubscribe with o...@dom.ain >by sending

Re: [OT] Where can I find some papers to read on mail (and envelope) security?

he classical email PGP combo. You know that you use snake oil then? These services decrypt your e-mails to "protect you against viruses" [0]. Best wishes Michael [0] https://www.deutschepost.de/de/e/epost/privatkunden/sicherheit.html signature.asc Description: Ope

Re: gpg > addphoto

On Wed, 09 Jan 2019 23:40:02 -0900 justina colmena via Gnupg-users writes, and having writ moves on: >It's a peculiar problem with which law enforcement is of little or no >assistance. There's a gun and a badge and a gang of dicks with >flashlights all over town, and a heavy-breathing warrant to

Re: [openssl-users] OpenSSL vs GPG for encrypting files? Security best practices?

> From: openssl-users on behalf of Nicholas > Papadonis > Sent: Friday, November 2, 2018 14:29 > I read Where? It's hard for us to determine the quality of your source, or your interpretation of it, if we don't know what it is. > that the OpenSSL AES-CBC CLI mode is prone to a malleable atta

Re: Using gnupg to crypt credentials used by application to access a database server

Hi all, Am Montag, den 16.07.2018, 09:29 +0200 schrieb Matthias Apitz: > Michael, I do use pass too for all my firefox credentials for access > of > webpages and services, i.e. I know how this works. I use for this > GnuPG > together with an OpenPGP card and to unlock the pas

Re: Using gnupg to crypt credentials used by application to access a database server

s ansible integration. Adding and removing users is a bit of hassle but it integrates much better with git than e.g. keepass or the like. Best wishes Michael [0] https://www.passwordstore.org/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed mes

Re: Break backwards compatibility

Hi Mark, Am Dienstag, den 22.05.2018, 02:25 +0100 schrieb Mark Rousell: > On 21/05/2018 08:53, Michael Kesper wrote: > > I think it might be best to put that functionality into a separate > > GnuPG version called gpg-legacy. > > Make it clear in all man pages of this to

Re: Break backwards compatibility

aters became louder and louder, "Success" stories of leaving the Python eco system exploded. Would they have integrated a non-GIL switch into that breaking change, the work for normal Python projects would not have been greater but the reason to switch would have been. Just 2 cents of a lon

Import keys from .gnupg folder

, and I have the private keys in the folder. The version of GPG on RHEL7.4 is 2.0.22, while Arch happens to be on 2.2.4-1. Would this be problematic? -- Michael Singh M: 914-266-0601 W: www.wadadli.me F: 5E0E FD46 4592 1682 A4B6 5F62 761E 4940 A177 3B38 Sent via Migadu.com, world's ea

Dead link for the Mutt-GnuPG HOWTO

ximum permissible length. Error code: SSL_ERROR_RX_RECORD_TOO_LONG -- Sincerely Michael S Singh, M: 914-266-0601 W: www.wadadli.me F: 5E0E FD46 4592 1682 A4B6 5F62 761E 4940 A177 3B38 <> signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Gnupg-us

Re: Help with error please

re did you get it?) Best wishes Michael signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: FAQ and GNU

and possibly more correct than GNU/Linux. -- |---+----| | Michael Englehorn | mich...@englehorn.com | | Twitter | K0HAX | | Github| https://github.com/K0HAX | | GPG Fingerprint | CC10 C6F7

Re: Signing failed -- "No secret key" even though I have it

On 17-09-24, azarus wrote: > Hello GPG users, > > I have a problem regarding signing data. Whenever I try clear-signing, > this appears: > [snip] > This is what gpg -K lists: > > /home/azarus/.gnupg/pubring.kbx > --- > sec rsa4096 2016-12-20 [SC] > > uid

Re: Don't send encrypted messages to random users

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 "Michael A. Yetto" writes: > On Tue, 30 May 2017 15:53:44 + > listo factor via Gnupg-users writes, and having > writ moves on: > >>On 05/29/2017 11:52 PM, Konstantin Gribov - gros...@gmail.com wrote: >>>

Re: Don't send encrypted messages to random users

On Tue, 30 May 2017 15:53:44 + listo factor via Gnupg-users writes, and having writ moves on: >On 05/29/2017 11:52 PM, Konstantin Gribov - gros...@gmail.com wrote: >> Primary reason to publish a key is to make it available for >> fetching. It isn't a permission for anyone to annoy a person >>

Re: Reviving a userid with revoked key

secret > key's password. > > Should I just delete the (revoked) key from my keyring and re-do a --gen-key > using the same/original e-mail address as the userid? You don't really have to delete it, you can just generate a new one using the same name and e-mail address.

Re: Smart card

copy of it). The kernelconcept cards at least can also be used with a key "backup". If you store that backup safely, you can still use your key when you put your smart card into washing mashine AND dryer (or it breaks for whatever reason) but you don't risk it being stolen

Re: Parallel decrypts fail in 2.1.19

nstall --build-from-source. The behavior has been consistent. On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 7:10 AM Justus Winter wrote: > > Michael Smith writes: > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA512 > > > >> Libgcrypt has the fix for the secure memory. Thus t

Re: Parallel decrypts fail in 2.1.19

pg-connect-agent 'getinfo version' /bye D 2.1.19 OK I am on a MacBook Pro and haven't changed any defaults related to ulimits, but I'll take a look. > We need to have a test case to replicate and valgrind the problem. How can I help further to create a test case? Thanks,

Parallel decrypts fail in 2.1.19

rsion gpg (GnuPG) 2.1.19 libgcrypt 1.7.6 - Michael A. Smith ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: Hi

On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 15:51:40 -0500 "Stephane R." writes, and having writ moves on: >Can I never receive a message from u again > >Sent from my iPad > If you look at the headers of every message, including your own, you will find the following header. List-Unsubscribe:

Re: Terminology - certificate or key ?

On Sun, 02 Oct 2016 12:44:16 +0200 "Julian H. Stacey" wrote: >https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2016-October/056809.html >> Frankly, I did not know how to translate the German term >> "Schnappschloss". I had in mind that a "latch" is similar to a >> "deadbolt". > >Heinz Diehl wrote

Forwarding scdaemon over SSH - is it possible?

alk to my local scdaemon? Cheers, -- Michael Fladischer Fladi.at signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: Top-posting

se that the Ubuntu community is a mess, and has > nothing to do with top or bottom or front or rear posting. Perhaps there should be an off-topic mailing list for all this stuff, rather than cluttering up a perfectly usable gnupg mailing list. - --- Michael J. Englehorn GPG Key

Re: Top-posting

On Thu, 28 Apr 2016 11:02:30 +0200 Paolo Bolzoni wrote: >I think this text (or variants) are old as email itself and >actually, while funny, makes little sense. > It makes quite a bit of sense when you are dragged into a thread that has gone on for a while. >When you follow an email thread you

Re: Top-posting

On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 16:53:28 +0100 Andrew Gallagher wrote: >On 27/04/16 16:48, Robert J. Hansen wrote: >>> What is the matter with top posting? >> >> A: Yes. Just not top-posting. >> Q: Are both allowed here? >> >> A: Quote a few lines, write your response to those few lines, >> quote a few l

RE: Use of --passphrase-file

intervention, but not let anyone else see or know where it was stored. Mike Michael W. Harman, MIT | Senior Application Architect, Information Services | UHS of Delaware, Inc. | a subsidiary of Universal Health Services | Phone 610.768.3416 From: Brian Minton [mailto:br...@minton.name] Sent

RE: Use of --passphrase-file

, any solution does not prevent someone from finding the passphrase if they really know how and where to look. I'll hide the passphrase and then lock it down with security. Thanks again, Mike Michael W. Harman, MIT | Senior Application Architect, Information Services | UHS of Delaware, Inc

Use of --passphrase-file

to preserve the passphrase. Do you have any recommendations where I can have a passphrase but still use it in an unattended fashion that is secure? Michael W. Harman, MIT | Senior Application Architect, Information Services | UHS of Delaware, Inc. | a subsidiary of Universal Health Service

Declaration of version 2.0.16 in France

Does anyone know whether a declaration has ever been filed by anyone with the French "L'Agence Nationale de la Sécurité des Systèmes d'information" (ANSSI) for GnuPG version 2.0.16 to allow import of the software into France? ___ Gnupg-users mailing l

Declaration in France

Does anyone know whether a declaration has ever been filed by anyone with the French "L'Agence Nationale de la Sécurité des Systèmes d'information" (ANSSI) for GnuPG version 2.0.16 to allow import of the software into France? ___ Gnupg-users mailing l

How Crissy Lynn can unsubscribe

On Sat, 3 Oct 2015 14:23:28 -0400 Crissy Lynn wrote: >Please! For the 600th time! REMOVE ME FROM THIS MAILING LIST! You have been asking how to unsubscribe and many participants on this mailing list have answered you. However, the theory has been proposed that you are not reading the list and h

Re: FAQ: drop mention of 1.4?

On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 18:15:21 -0400 Crissy Lynn wrote: >PLEASE REMOVE ME FROM THIS MAILING LIST!! All of the e-mails I get from this list have the following header. List-Unsubscribe: ,

Re: [Announce] GnuPG 2.1.7 released

gpg4win - thinking slowly - does this mean there is a skeleton, or better project, to minimize what is needed from gnome to run the "modern" versions of gnupg. I do not want to install much - actually nothing - of a X11 "server" environment on AIX. I prefer to work with X things as applications my

RE: Libksba Release notes

So the entry is unknown, correct? -Original Message- From: Werner Koch [mailto:w...@gnupg.org] Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 5:15 AM To: Kristian Fiskerstrand Cc: Gordon, Michael; gnupg-users@gnupg.org Subject: Re: Libksba Release notes On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 10:44, kristian.fiskerstr

RE: Libksba Release notes

I am not sure if this helps. (see attached) Thanks, Mike -Original Message- From: Werner Koch [mailto:w...@gnupg.org] Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 4:49 AM To: Gordon, Michael Cc: gnupg-users@gnupg.org Subject: Re: Libksba Release notes On Wed, 3 Jun 2015 14:15, michael.gor

Libksba Release notes

I am trying to understand the new functionality added to release GnuPG 1.0.5 for Windows. The release noted states "This is a binary release for Windows". What does this statement mean? Thanks. Michael Gordon ___ Gnupg-users mailing

GNUPG 2.* and AIX - questions

/sys/time.h:#define __NUM_ENTRIES (FD_SETSIZE/__NFDBITS+1) Again, this is NOT a bug-report. I have never seen gnupg 2.0 (so maybe it is all GUI related, when all I am really interested in is security abilities). Thank your for your time. Michael p.s. please forgive the cross post to @devel - no

Re: GnuPG 2.1.0 "modern" released

I sent a possible patch. the value returned in rl is MAX_INT32, not -1. not sure if looking for the smallest value is what get max fds should be doing though. On Dec 3, 2014 9:20 PM, "Werner Koch" wrote: > On Wed, 3 Dec 2014 11:40, aixto...@gmail.com said: > > > max. file descriptors: 214748364

Re: GnuPG 2.1.0 "modern" released

rintf(stderr,"OPEN_MAX:\tmax_fds:%10d\n", max_fds); +#endif #endif - if (max_fds == -1) -max_fds = 256; /* Arbitrary limit. */ +max_fds = (max_fds > 256) ? 256 : max_fds; +#if 0 +fprintf(stderr,"return:\t\tmax_fds:%10d\n", max_fds); +#endif return max_fds; }

Re: GnuPG 2.1.0 "modern" released

Hello, I am running "make check" and the process seems to stop after this line to stdout ... CERT lookup on 'simon.josefsson.org' Key found (33162 bytes) PASS: t-dns-cert PASS: t-mapstrings PASS: t-zb32 max. file descriptors: 2147483647 Is this perhaps a bug - at least for the test logic - becaus

Re: GnuPG 2.1.0 "modern" released

ursive] Error 1 make: *** [all] Error 2 /opt/bin/make returned an error There may be more messages (to come), but this is where it stops for now. Michael p.s. My last note was only to the list. Did it show up? (I shall go register - now while I think of it!) On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:51 PM, We

Re: GnuPG 2.1.0 "modern" released

what does the test t-exeche do, besides spin on the processor (after saying PASS: t-zb32 max. file descriptors: 2147483647 Michael On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Werner Koch wrote: > On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 16:30, aixto...@gmail.com said: > > > However, configure is reporting - i

Re: GnuPG 2.1.0 "modern" released

gpgsm-gencert.sh.1' yat2m: writing 'gpg-preset-passphrase.1' yat2m: writing 'gpg-connect-agent.1' yat2m: writing 'dirmngr-client.1' yat2m: writing 'gpgparsemail.1' yat2m: writing 'symcryptrun.1' yat2m: writing 'gpg-zip.1' asschk.c: In func

Re: GnuPG 2.1.0 "modern" released

- iconv_close D 40572 12 iconv_open D 40596 12 root@x064:[/data/prj/gnu/gcrypt/gnupg/gnupg-2.1.0] Thank you for your assistance, Michael On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Werner Koch wrote: > Hello! > > The GnuPG Project is pleased to announce

Re: GnuPG 2.1.0 "modern" released

Same question: who to submit bug too? libgcrypt is not compiling (all other pre-requistes are done). Thanks. "../src/mpi.h", line 292.16: 1506-343 (S) Redeclaration of _gcry_mpi_ec_set_mpi differs from previous declaration on line 423 of "../src/gcrypt-int.h". "../src/mpi.h", line 292.16: 1506-0

Re: Nearly fixed

I remember something like this happening with shorewall or smoothwall or something where this guy tried to get ownership of the opensource so then everybody jumped ship and made ipcop. Some guy came on the new mailing list and you would swear he was a wind-up, knew enough to keep you on your toes b

Re: Why the software is crap

On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 23:28:49 +0100 Heinz Diehl wrote: >___ > /| /| | | > ||__|| | Please don't | > / O O\__ feed | >

Re: [Announce] GnuPG 2.1.0 "modern" released

Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works| network architect [ ] m...@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/| ruby on rails[ pgpxyAsFJlM_e.pgp Description: PGP signature ___

Re: [Announce] GnuPG 2.1.0 "modern" released

nly. -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works| network architect [ ] m...@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/| ruby on rails[ pgpWBpGjrKqLy.pgp Description: PGP signat

Wind river

t you for defending your (the us) administration, yet in my opinion both our administrations deserve some bashing once in a while for excessive ignorance and/or sluggishness. Cheers, Michael Anders ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: Wind river

ely gone nuts and assumes others are too stupid to implement strong crypto by themselves or else -and this semms more probable to me- they go for a cheap short term advantage and stage a theater to make others believe the software that was exported would be secure while it is not... regards

Re: It's time for PGP to die

ork plugged into it. I wouldn't want to code it. By the way - Green (rightfully) critizises PGP for bad defaults (e.g. using SHA1) yet he praises TextSecure which heavily relies on SHA1. This leaves me baffled.   Cheers,   Michael Anders     __

Re: Fwd: It's time for PGP to die.

with me on this point, yet I have never heard a convincing argument for the MAC in an asymmetric cipher.) If you want authenticity, you have to have the message or cipher be digitally signed by the sender. For me the critcism of PGP is clearly unfair regarding this second aspect. Regards,

Re: Gnupg-users Digest, Vol 131, Issue 15

ome improvement compared to the publicly known methods to factor RSA moduli, expect such improvement from other sources or else just want to push ECC. (I like ECC -> google "open source elliptic curve cryptography".)) Cheers Michael Anders ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: gpg: checking created signature failed: Bad signature

bad hard drive ? ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: how to do

t keys, however, and that you could always at least embed the exported subkey into a newly created parent key structure and newly design whatever sub/super-key structure you like around the exported key. So unless there is convincing cryptographic reasoning about why you cannot do something to the key

how to do

in it that should have access to a specific private key? If not any other suggestions or example or URL of places that have detailed explanations would be appreciated. Best Regards Michael Gould - The information contained in this e-mail message is int

RE: Engimail & Thunderbird

I have not been able to use OpenPGP since I upgraded to Ubuntu 14.04 on my 64 bit Laptop. Can anyone help? I have other computers where PGP works well: 32 bit Dell B130 with Xubuntu 12.4, Windows 7 desktop -- Sincerely; Michael B. Harris MRAC Secretary Linux User# 1063

Thunderbird--Ubuntu 14.04

. -- Sincerely; Michael B. Harris Linux User# 1063 ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: Gnupg-users Digest, Vol 128, Issue 24

> nt-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > > Now where did you calculate that from? > > $dS = \frac{\delta Q}{T}$ > > Second Law of Thermodynamics, which you just broke. Have a nice day. > The (cold) system where the calculation is done and the (hot) system the result is transferred only ex

Re: GPG's vulnerability to quantum cryptography

On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 22:26 +0200, gnupg-users-requ...@gnupg.org wrote: > If you want to run the temperature lower than the ambient > temperature > of the cosmos (3.2K), you have to add energy to run the heat pump -- > and the amount of energy required to run that heat pump will bring > your

GPG's vulnerability to quantum cryptography

> > GPG encrypted data (using RSA) can be collected today and easily decrypted > after 50-100 years using a quantum computer. See: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shor%27s_algorithm Well let's see. Usually in a new technology, once you are really going to apply it in the real world, new problems

Re: Multiple Subkey Pairs

of cryptography in many contexts. There is no such thing as attrition of security by heavy usage of a public RSA or ECC key. When it comes to system compromise leading to broken security. This is not kind of an aging process smoothly proceeding with time and eventually leading to death. They target

Re: Multiple Subkey Pairs

such thing as attrition of security by heavy usage of a public RSA or ECC key.   When it comes to system compromise leading to broken security. This is not kind of an aging process smoothly proceeding with time and eventually leading to death. They target you or they don't.   ch

Encrypting File with passphrase,

iven when it is not needed. This seems reasonable to me. regards Michael Anders (http://www.fh-wedel.de/~an/) ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Re: key generation: paranoia mode - explicit random input

ave been a keylogger in place and security of the key is gone. If you consider the NSA to be a benevolent organization, you might make a distinction between security against criminals and security against the NSA, but that is politics and not cryptography. Cheers, Mich

Trying to understand the bond between master and subordinal key pairs

PGP, which thankworthily is usually more or less hidden from the user anyways? A good reason would help the complicated workings to stick with my memory :-) Why would we need more than one key and this hierarchy on top of it? (Proper padding according to the standard to my knowledge removes even the dan

  1   2   3   >