Werner Koch via Gnupg-users writes:
> Hi!
>
> while talking about gpgv, let me remind you about the new
> --assert-signer option which can be used as a replacement for gpgv.
>
> --assert-signer fpr_or_file
>
> This option checks whether at least one val
Hi Dennis,
would you mind telling us which gpg version you are using and what your
distribution is?
> oberon$ gpgconf --list-config
> gpgconf: can't open global config file
> '/usr/local/etc/gnupg/gpgconf.conf': No such file or directory
> oberon$
man gpgconf
[...]
/etc/gnupg/
n.conf and check whether it gives some insights.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
The pioneers of a warless world are the youth that
refuse military service. - A. Einstein
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users m
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Hi!
On Sat, 20 Jul 2024 06:54, Dennis Clarke said:
> The struggle continues to get gnupg to "just work". By running a trace
> on the command "gpgconf --check-programs" I see this :
>
>
> access("/usr/local/bin/gpgconf.ctl", F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No s
Thank you! The below solution worked.
Thanks & Regards,
Siva Krishna Sayavarapu | Sr. EDI Programmer Analyst | FedEx Logistics
-Original Message-
From: NIIBE Yutaka
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2024 7:04 PM
To: Siva Krishna Sayavarapu
Cc: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL
Hey GnuPG folks--
I've written `sopv-gpgv`, which implements the verification-only subset
of the Stateless OpenPGP CLI, using gpgv as a backend.
If you're an implementer who needs a minimalist, verification-only
OpenPGP command-line tool, and you'd prefer to use a stable, normalized
interface
* Dennis Clarke via Gnupg-users:
> I have no idea what you are talking about. That is not a manpage.
I can see that you have no idea. Look closely at the URL you posted [1],
and you will notice the infix "/manual/".
[1] https://www.gnupg.org/gph/en/manual/c14.html
What I wro
The struggle continues to get gnupg to "just work". By running a trace
on the command "gpgconf --check-programs" I see this :
access("/usr/local/bin/gpgconf.ctl", F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
In the sources I see the file doc/gnupg.inf
On 7/20/24 03:10, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2024-07-20 Dennis Clarke via Gnupg-users wrote:
Looking at https://www.gnupg.org/gph/en/manual/c14.html one would get
the idea that GPG would "just work" given that pinentry is right there
oberon$ which pinentry
/usr/local/bi
On 7/20/24 04:30, Ralph Seichter via Gnupg-users wrote:
* Dennis Clarke via Gnupg-users:
Looking at https://www.gnupg.org/gph/en/manual/c14.html one would get
the idea that GPG would "just work" given that pinentry is right there
in my PATH [...]
How would one get that idea? The m
* Dennis Clarke via Gnupg-users:
> Looking at https://www.gnupg.org/gph/en/manual/c14.html one would get
> the idea that GPG would "just work" given that pinentry is right there
> in my PATH [...]
How would one get that idea? The manual page you linked contains neither
the st
INENTRY_PATH=/usr/local/bin
oberon$ export PINENTRY_PATH
oberon$
oberon$ gpg --full-generate-key
gpg (GnuPG) 2.4.5; Copyright (C) 2024 g10 Code GmbH
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
Please select what kind of key you w
Hi Team,
Can you please look into the below issue and advise as I'm unable to fix this
with the solution that I found?
Thanks & Regards,
Siva Krishna Sayavarapu | Sr. EDI Programmer Analyst | FedEx Logistics | mobile
901.482.6179
From: Gnupg-users On Behalf Of Siva Krishna
Sayavarapu
e.
I support to deliver weapons to Ukraine's military.
I support the EU and NATO membership of Ukraine.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
iver weapons to Ukraine's military.
I support the EU and NATO membership of Ukraine.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
edEx Logistics | mobile
901.482.6179
From: Siva Krishna Sayavarapu
Sent: Monday, July 1, 2024 8:53 AM
To: 'gnupg-users@gnupg.org'
Subject: RE: GPG error: Inappropriate ioctl for device
Hi Team,
We are using GPG version 2.2.20 and recently we have upgraded our linux server
from RHEL7 to R
Hello!
We are pleased to announce the availability of a new GnuPG release:
version 2.5.0. This release is the first of a series of public testing
releases eventually leading to a new stable version 2.6.
The main features in the 2.6 series are improvements for 64 bit Windows
and the introduction
Hi
updating libksba is not enough. You also need to update gpgsm. Maybe
you can try GnuPG 2.5.0 which we released on Friday.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
The pioneers of a warless world are the youth that
refuse military service. - A. Einstein
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
pa.html will contain the
processed metadata which will be consumed by app centers
Thanks!
Sid
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
wit the
final FIPS2-03 and LibrePGP specification.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
The pioneers of a warless world are the youth that
refuse military service. - A. Einstein
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg
All,
Please approve my dev.gnupg.org account request. I have a bug to report.
Handle: ajh
Shown name: Aaron Howland
Mail address: howland...@gmail.com
- Aaron Howland
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman
6179
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Hi, has anyone testing GnuPG on the new Snapdragon X Elite laptops? As
far as I know, gnupg on Linux has no issues compiling for ARM, but I
know there is an open issue for arm64 builds of gnupg for windows
(https://dev.gnupg.org/T5342).
I don't know whether the x86 emulation would work, given
El jue, 06-06-2024 a las 08:14 +0200, Werner Koch via Gnupg-users
escribió:
> On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 21:43, Ingo Klöcker said:
>
> > Just create a new S-only subkey. There's no need to remove the S
> > capability
> > from the primary key because the signing key is only used
A7 480A 5FBC DB67 857F 54D3 434C 945C 1278 2FD7
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Hi,
Can someone please approve my account?
Handle: collinfunk
Shown name: Collin Funk
Mail address: collin.fu...@gmail.com
Thanks,
Collin
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
youth that
refuse military service. - A. Einstein
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Hello, I would like to request a new account for filing a document
issue. Here are the account details:
"brlin", "林博仁(Buo-ren, Lin)", "buo.ren@gmail.com"
Thanks,
林博仁(Buo-ren, Lin)
buo.ren@gmail.com
___
Gnupg-
. - A. Einstein
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Hi Patrick,
Am Freitag 07 Juni 2024 12:25:58 schrieb Patrick F. Marques via Gnupg-users:
> I believe there is a “tiny” typo in this page
> https://www.gnupg.org/gph/en/manual/x334.html
> I believe it should be “their key” instead of “they key”
thanks for reporting!
> Also, accord
vation GmbH, Osnabrück, DE; Amtsgericht Osnabrück, HRB 18998
Geschäftsführer: Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/m
Hi Marco, hi Werner,
Am Dienstag 18 Juni 2024 08:44:00 schrieb Bernhard Reiter via Gnupg-users:
> > I can send you mine if you would like to test.
>
> At least I can try to import it and see what my version says.
did a test with Gpg4win, which print a different error message:
gpg (
Hi
> 4 - 2024-06-18 16:08:56 gpgsm[39608]: ksba_cms_parse failed:
> Ungültiges CMS Objekt
Please send me such a non-parseable message/data by private mail. No
HTML parts or ZIP files, just gzip the message.
Which version of GnuPG are you using:
gpgsm --version
also shows the l
by GnuPG. It does not provide any
implementation of OpenPGP or other protocols. Thorough understanding of
applied cryptography is required to use Libgcrypt.
Noteworthy changes in Libgcrypt 1.11.0 since 1.10.3
===
* New and extended interfaces
Am Montag 17 Juni 2024 19:27:35 schrieb Marco Moock:
> Am 17.06.2024 um 17:14:07 Uhr schrieb Bernhard Reiter via Gnupg-users:
> > does Sectigo offer a public certificate somewhere which could
> > possibly be imported for a test?
> I can send you mine if you would like to test.
digest algorithm '?' used certificate
from 2.2.43 let me assume that the algorithm is unknown to GnuPG.
However this could be wrong.
Regards
Bernhard
--
https://intevation.de/~bernhard +49 541 33 508 3-3
Intevation GmbH, Osnabrück, DE; Amtsgericht Osnabrück, HRB 18998
Geschäftsführer: Frank Ko
Hi!
If you send bug reports or asking for support please always tell us the
version of GnuPG you are using as well as the operating system and its
version. The latter part is needed because Linux distributions often
apply a lot of custom changes to software which are not reflected by the
version
On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 14:43, Marco Moock said:
> It wasn't, I enabled it, but the error stays.
I doubt that it is due to the gnupg version but we are anyway
interested to see that. The output of
gpgconf -X
might also be useful becuase it also lists any global configuration.
(Please red
Hi
If you have access to the Kleopatra gui, you can just open the .cert
with Kleopatra. And than it will ask you for the password with the cert
and let you set a new one. Once Kleopatra accepted the cert, gpg will
sync it.
Eason
___
Gnupg
Thank you Francesco that does help,
I did not realize that by signing the public key, it is also mark as
trusted, thanks
Eason
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 02:09:15PM -0400, Jack via Gnupg-users wrote:
> On 2024.06.13 06:57, ael via Gnupg-users wrote:
> > Further thoughts on detecting a mistaken passphrase entry when
> > encrypting. I have looked at both
> > man gpg-agent and info
[...snip..]
> I'
On 2024.06.13 06:57, ael via Gnupg-users wrote:
Further thoughts on detecting a mistaken passphrase entry when
encrypting. I have looked at both
man gpg-agent and info
and I could not immediately see anything to help, but I quickly became
lost in the overwhelming volume of the entries :-)
So
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
thing there that I have missed."
It may be that a should be using the ssh-support mode and perhaps
avoiding the problem via SSH keys.
ael
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Something like this would be a huge improvement for my use case.
Probably useful more generally. Of course, you would still need double
entry when initially setting up a passphrase which does not yet have a
hash.
ael
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
G
on the man page, but it is so lon that it is
hard to find things there.
I will copy to the list since others may have similar concerns.
Thanks for all the work,
ael
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On Sat, Jun 08, 2024 at 03:26:05AM +, Eric Pruitt via Gnupg-users wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 06:03:22PM -0500, Jacob Bachmeyer via Gnupg-users
> wrote:
> > Strictly, "their" is plural in English
>
> No, it is not. "They" and "their" have
are the youth that
refuse military service. - A. Einstein
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Hello,
I would like an account in order to report a bug
handle: modernNeo
shown name: Jace M.
email: jaymans...@proton.me
-JM
Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email.___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https
On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 11:47:08PM -0500, Jacob Bachmeyer via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Few English-as-a-foreign-language courses should be expected to
> mention singular "they", so its use is inappropriate in documentation.
There are lots of things that aren't taught in classrooms
Eric Pruitt wrote:
On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 06:03:22PM -0500, Jacob Bachmeyer via Gnupg-users wrote:
Strictly, "their" is plural in English
No, it is not. "They" and "their" have been used as gender-neutral,
singular pronouns for centuries. Even if tha
On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 06:03:22PM -0500, Jacob Bachmeyer via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Strictly, "their" is plural in English
No, it is not. "They" and "their" have been used as gender-neutral,
singular pronouns for centuries. Even if that wasn't the case, it's
wid
Patrick F. Marques via Gnupg-users wrote:
Hi,
I was reading the gnupg documentation and although I’m not an English
native, I believe there is a “tiny” typo in this page
https://www.gnupg.org/gph/en/manual/x334.html
In the first paragraph:
(…) By personally checking the fingerprint you
y and only
for the usual email case, I am still a novice.
What am I missing?
ael
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Hi,
I was reading the gnupg documentation and although I’m not an English
native, I believe there is a “tiny” typo in this page
https://www.gnupg.org/gph/en/manual/x334.html
In the first paragraph:
(…) By personally checking the fingerprint you can be sure that the key
really does belong to him
%2Bq7hHPDezSzFKpV3R8UJReadlU502S0z2zrnbQg4lxNhifBRUvEpz0yH4%2BwByMD%2Bn3LQ1%2BtP1nMSlLv7U68jman61Fkxg20dEOq%2BWlt9DBW2WxjnQ!-!D1BKUkDs11oYwYWfr/DHf6NNeVCes0eGwQS85frnS0r3Dya0aZYIEpksscUFoLgl___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo
nd
choose the right key (new subkey-S) for signature-verification, correct?
Regards,
RG.
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
gital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
).
Thoughts?
Regards,
Raghav "RG" Gururajan.
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
litary service. - A. Einstein
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
martcards.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
The pioneers of a warless world are the youth that
refuse military service. - A. Einstein
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.
Werner
--
The pioneers of a warless world are the youth that
refuse military service. - A. Einstein
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman
mode. This was required because at the time of the
release we had not yet an approval to use this for VS-NfD/Restricted
communication. Thus in the GnuPG VS-Desktop configuraion this option is
only set after we received the approval.
For key generation the flag is indded not set by default:
uot;?
Yours,
Rens Rikkerink
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
).
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
The pioneers of a warless world are the youth that
refuse military service. - A. Einstein
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https
b ed25519 2022-10-26 [S]
sub cv25519 2022-10-26 [E]
Thank you for your time so far.
Yours,
Rens Rikkerink
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
de GmbH GnuPG.com AmtsGer. Wuppertal HRB 14459
Bergstr. 3a Geschäftsführung Werner Koch
D-40699 Erkrath https://gnupg.com USt-Id DE215605608
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Clearsign not working on new debian install. NisT-P21.
encryption/ decryption works. Hej.
Yours sincerely
Richardh Bostrom___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
r IMAP server with user certificate based
authentication.
--
The pioneers of a warless world are the youth that
refuse military service. - A. Einstein
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnup
On Thu, 2 May 2024 16:58, Matěj Cepl said:
> rather dubious: systemd can certainly manage a dependence on
> shared resource, and concurrent running of two processes at
Right. However, systemd does not use the same locking scheme as gnupg
uses to avoid duplicate daemon startup. The
On Thu May 2, 2024 at 3:55 PM CEST, Ming Kuang via Gnupg-users wrote:
> https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2024-March/066957.html
> https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2024-March/066960.html
Just for the record, I find the explanation in the later email
rather d
t is
always enabled and thus the option is not really required.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
The pioneers of a warless world are the youth that
refuse military service. - A. Einstein
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
____
SSH crypted with GnuPG (to
> be exactly with an OpenPGP card in the phone). I can do fine:
>
> $ gpg -d id_rsa.asc > id_rsa # which asks for the PIN of the OpenPGP card
> $ ssh www.unixarea.de
> Enter passphrase for key '/home/guru/.ssh/id_rsa':
> ...
> $ rm id_rsa # so
Hey Andrew,
Yes, this happens consistently, I have not been able to add a uid at
all, using both my main yubikey and backup yubikey (which have the
same private key on them)
Yours,
Rens
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https
On 1 May 2024, at 10:08, Rens Rikkerink via Gnupg-users
wrote:
>
> Lately I've been trying to add a new uid to my public key, I have
> however so far been unsuccessful in doing so. Every time I try to do
> so, I then immediately get "1 bad signature" which wasn't pres
ND PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
ed therein at https://dev.gnupg.org/T4154 would be useful to web
searchers.
On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 8:14 PM Jacob Bachmeyer
wrote:
>
> Bee via Gnupg-users wrote:
> >> Its is called "USER DATA" for a reason - you have to decide what to do
> >> with it.
> &g
Bee via Gnupg-users wrote:
Its is called "USER DATA" for a reason - you have to decide what to do
with it.
But a novel pinentry must be created to receive the data. Again, this
is circular.
If your really really want a passphrase, what about passing
the filename of a fi
gainst local users - are stupid policy requirements you
> have to follow. In all other cases, first come up with an attack tree
> to show that a passphrase is of any use for your application.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
se military service. - A. Einstein
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
;
> > Has anyone got a link to a working example of '3<' or 'PINENTRY_USER_DATA
> > which can fulfill the same task' of gpg picking up its passphrase from an
> > environment variable?
>
>
> Examine https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2024-March/067030.html
> ('
d of bug reports.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
The pioneers of a warless world are the youth that
refuse military service. - A. Einstein
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.
pg picking up its passphrase from an
environment variable?
Examine https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2024-March/067030.html
('How can I 'echo' into fd 3 to be able to use it on a gpg cmd line?') for
a more detailed example script solution, but in brief for this thread:
gs_my
On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 4:55 PM Daniele Nicolodi via Gnupg-users <
gnupg-users@gnupg.org> wrote:
> I have an oldish GPG key for which I have lost the passphrase. I have a
> very good idea of what the passphrase is constructed but there are some
> characters substitution that I must
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 11:14:06AM +0200, Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 21:39, Eric Pruitt said:
> > I have multiple public keys in my GPG keyring. When validating
> > signatures, I sometimes want to validate them against a specific key so
>
iption: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
one key and using that, and some cursory
searching didn't uncover any alternatives. If there still isn't a GPG
option for validating a signature against a specific key, is there a
particular reason it doesn't exist?
Eric
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Einstein
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
world are the youth that
refuse military service. - A. Einstein
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
!
I think the best solution is for gnupg to ignore the `with-fingerprint`
configuration option. Modern versions display primary key fingerprints by
default anyway, so the alternative display format is both redundant and
potentially confusing.
I would be particularly concerned that pe
her wrote:
>
> On 28 Mar 2024, at 12:54, Christian Sommer via Gnupg-users
> wrote:
>
>
> when explicitly telling GnuPG to display x448 fingerprints (gpg
> --fingerprint) it just spits out the "abbreviated hex format" by takes
> the first 50 bytes and sweeping the
On 28 Mar 2024, at 12:54, Christian Sommer via Gnupg-users
wrote:
>
> when explicitly telling GnuPG to display x448 fingerprints (gpg
> --fingerprint) it just spits out the "abbreviated hex format" by takes
> the first 50 bytes and sweeping the rest under the rug! Not ver
work in retrieving it.
Does anyone know how to run john on a private key stored in the format
used by the new keystore used by gpg2?
Thank you.
Cheers,
Dan
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 12:24, Moses said:
> tried to import again, and the same error still occurred. The same
> error happened when I tried to directly execute the
> D:\software\GNU\GnuPG\bin\gpg --import command.
Well, I have no more idea on how to debug this by mail :-(.
On Linux you
error still occurred. The same
error happened when I tried to directly execute the
D:\software\GNU\GnuPG\bin\gpg --import command.
- --
M.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 3:35 PM Werner Koch wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I see in your PATH
>
> D:\software\GNU\GnuWin32\bin
>
> prior to
>
Werner
--
The pioneers of a warless world are the youth that
refuse military service. - A. Einstein
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listi
Hi,
Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Apr 2024 13:03, Todd Zullinger said:
>
>> In such a case, it sounds like it may be reasonable to use
>> the normal socket? Until the remote side is updated to
>
> In fact, I also did this for som
Hi,
I see in your PATH
D:\software\GNU\GnuWin32\bin
prior to
D:\software\GNU\Gpg4win\..\GnuPG\bin
May it be that you use a gpg version picked up from the GnuWin32? Check
also whether there is a gpg binary in the Git program directory.
My educated guess is that Gnuwin32 is a Cygwin based
1 - 100 of 3587 matches
Mail list logo
