Re: [Announce] The maybe final Beta for GnuPG 2.1

2014-10-31 Thread Pete Stephenson
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Werner Koch wrote: > Hello! > > I just released another *beta* version of GnuPG *2.1*. It has been > released to give you the opportunity to check out new features and to > help fixing bugs. Hi all, I had a few minor issues/questions with GnuPG 2.1 beta895 that I

Re: [Announce] The maybe final Beta for GnuPG 2.1

2014-10-26 Thread Pete Stephenson
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Murphy wrote: > Problem solved. The error in finding the shared libraries was > resolved with a single command after the successful speedo install > using the INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr/local option on my ubuntu 14.04 machine: > > sudo ldconfig My apologies for not resp

Re: [Announce] The maybe final Beta for GnuPG 2.1

2014-10-26 Thread Murphy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Problem solved. The error in finding the shared libraries was resolved with a single command after the successful speedo install using the INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr/local option on my ubuntu 14.04 machine: sudo ldconfig To summarize the following worked f

Re: [Announce] The maybe final Beta for GnuPG 2.1

2014-10-26 Thread Murphy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Peter Lebbing wrote: > Success! Installing the libldap2-dev package resolves the issue > and the build process completes with no other errors. > When I add PLAY/inst/bin/ to my path and PLAY/inst/lib/ to the list >

Re: [Announce] The maybe final Beta for GnuPG 2.1

2014-10-15 Thread Werner Koch
Hi Pete, thanks for looking at this case. FWIW, I am consider to make LDAP and optional feature. Most users are likely interested in OpenPGP and thus keyserver access and don't need the former main feature of Dirmngr (LDAP based X.509 certifciate lookup). Salam-Shalom, Werner -- Die Geda

Re: [Announce] The maybe final Beta for GnuPG 2.1

2014-10-15 Thread Pete Stephenson
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Peter Lebbing wrote: > On 04/10/14 00:28, Pete Stephenson wrote: >> To my untrained, non-developer[1] eye, there appears to be several >> things that failed though I'm not sure how to interpret things >> correctly. The full config log is ~250kB. I've posted it to a

Re: [Announce] The maybe final Beta for GnuPG 2.1

2014-10-15 Thread Peter Lebbing
On 04/10/14 00:28, Pete Stephenson wrote: > To my untrained, non-developer[1] eye, there appears to be several > things that failed though I'm not sure how to interpret things > correctly. The full config log is ~250kB. I've posted it to a Pastebin > at http://pastebin.com/xZjzsZju if that would he

Re: [Announce] The maybe final Beta for GnuPG 2.1

2014-10-12 Thread Ludwig Hügelschäfer
On 12.10.14 12:36, Ben McGinnes wrote: > (...) /usr/include/inttypes.h:235:8: error: unknown type name > 'intmax_t' extern intmax_t ^ /usr/include/inttypes.h:236:9: error: > unknown type name 'intmax_t' imaxabs(intmax_t j); ^ > /usr/include/inttypes.h:240:2: error: unknown type name 'intmax_t' >

Re: [Announce] The maybe final Beta for GnuPG 2.1

2014-10-12 Thread Ben McGinnes
On 9/10/2014 12:48 am, Werner Koch wrote: > On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 09:13, b...@adversary.org said: > >> Now since the configure script for pinentry is about 13,000 lines > > That is generated. The actual configure.ac script is 565 lines. > > I do not understand you remarks about libc++ - is that r

Re: [Announce] The maybe final Beta for GnuPG 2.1

2014-10-08 Thread Ben McGinnes
On 9/10/2014 12:48 am, Werner Koch wrote: > On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 09:13, b...@adversary.org said: > >> Now since the configure script for pinentry is about 13,000 lines > > That is generated. The actual configure.ac script is 565 lines. > > I do not understand you remarks about libc++ - is that r

Re: [Announce] The maybe final Beta for GnuPG 2.1

2014-10-08 Thread Werner Koch
On Sat, 4 Oct 2014 23:19, joh...@vulcan.xs4all.nl said: > 2.1.0 final? Shoudn't that be 2.2.0, or did GnuPG stop with the old > version numbering system of the Linux kernel? Good question. From my experience only a few people look at development versions/beta/whatever-you call it. Those who ar

Re: [Announce] The maybe final Beta for GnuPG 2.1

2014-10-08 Thread Werner Koch
On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 09:13, b...@adversary.org said: > Now since the configure script for pinentry is about 13,000 lines That is generated. The actual configure.ac script is 565 lines. I do not understand you remarks about libc++ - is that required for the Qt version of Pinentry? The other pine

Re: [Announce] The maybe final Beta for GnuPG 2.1

2014-10-08 Thread Werner Koch
On Sat, 4 Oct 2014 00:28, p...@heypete.com said: > That said, if I did want to compile the latest version of GnuTLS from > source, where should one place the compiled results so that the GnuPG > build process would know about it? That depends on your system. It is hard to put this all into the

Re: [Announce] The maybe final Beta for GnuPG 2.1

2014-10-05 Thread Ben McGinnes
On 4/10/2014 12:35 am, Werner Koch wrote: > Hello! > > I just released another *beta* version of GnuPG *2.1*. It has been > released to give you the opportunity to check out new features and to > help fixing bugs. I'm most of the way through a test compile (in /opt/local) on OS X 10.9 (64-bi

Re: [Announce] The maybe final Beta for GnuPG 2.1

2014-10-04 Thread Johan Wevers
On 3-10-2014 19:15, Robert J. Hansen wrote: > Ministerium fuer Staatsicherheit[*], commonly known as Stasi, practiced > surveillance of its own citizens on a scale that's hard to imagine. Is this a sollicitation for remarks about the NSA, FBI, DEA, etc. etc.? :-) -- ir. J.C.A. Wevers PGP/GPG pu

Re: [Announce] The maybe final Beta for GnuPG 2.1

2014-10-04 Thread Johan Wevers
On 3-10-2014 16:35, Werner Koch wrote: > This version is marked as BETA and as such it should in general not be > used for real work. However, the functionality is solid enough and thus > this may actually be the last beta before we release 2.1.0 some time > this year. 2.1.0 final? Shoudn't that

Re: [Announce] The maybe final Beta for GnuPG 2.1

2014-10-03 Thread Pete Stephenson
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Werner Koch wrote: > On Fri, 3 Oct 2014 17:40, p...@heypete.com said: > >> make -f build-aux/speedo.mk native >> >> it does quite a bit, but always seems to spit out the following errors >> and fails to complete. The bit about gnutls is non-critical for me, >> but

Re: [Announce] The maybe final Beta for GnuPG 2.1

2014-10-03 Thread Murphy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Pete - beta 864 compiled perfectly for me in Ubuntu 14.04 LTS. I suspect you need to use super user powers here. If you want a practice version try in a safe directory try: sudo make -f build-aux/speedo.mk native otherwise if you want it installed

Re: [Announce] The maybe final Beta for GnuPG 2.1

2014-10-03 Thread Peter Lebbing
> I am getting the same problem. I already have that package installed. Please try to get the relevant part of the error message that actually tells what it didn't find, because the log posted by Pete is cut down too far to actually tell. You could also include the whole log, I think. Or would t

Re: [Announce] The maybe final Beta for GnuPG 2.1

2014-10-03 Thread David Schraeder
I am getting the same problem. I already have that package installed. On 10/3/2014 11:39 AM, Werner Koch wrote: > On Fri, 3 Oct 2014 17:40, p...@heypete.com said: > >> make -f build-aux/speedo.mk native >> >> it does quite a bit, but always seems to spit out the following errors >> and fails t

Re: [Announce] The maybe final Beta for GnuPG 2.1

2014-10-03 Thread Ludwig Hügelschäfer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 03.10.14 19:47, Peter Lebbing wrote: > It is most definitely Staatssicherheit as in "die Sicherheit des > Staat(e)s". It's a genetive, just like it's People's Republic of > China and not People Republic of China. Perfect explanation! > In my m

Re: [Announce] The maybe final Beta for GnuPG 2.1

2014-10-03 Thread Robert J. Hansen
> Disclaimer: I'm not Werner, and I'm Dutch. These are forgivable character flaws. :) > It is most definitely Staatssicherheit as in "die Sicherheit des > Staat(e)s". It's a genetive, just like it's People's Republic of China > and not People Republic of China. Ah, that explains my difficulty.

Re: [Announce] The maybe final Beta for GnuPG 2.1

2014-10-03 Thread Peter Lebbing
On 03/10/14 19:15, Robert J. Hansen wrote: > [*] Werner, Wikipedia lists it as Staatssicherheit, but for some reason > that just doesn't look right to me. Is it? Disclaimer: I'm not Werner, and I'm Dutch. It is most definitely Staatssicherheit as in "die Sicherheit des Staat(e)s". It's a genetiv

Re: [Announce] The maybe final Beta for GnuPG 2.1

2014-10-03 Thread Robert J. Hansen
>> Maintaining and improving GnuPG is costly. For more than a decade, >> g10 Code GmbH, a German company owned and headed by GnuPG's principal >> author Werner Koch, is bearing the majority of these costs. To help >> them carry on this work, they need your support. See >> >> https://gnupg.org/

Re: [Announce] The maybe final Beta for GnuPG 2.1

2014-10-03 Thread Werner Koch
On Fri, 3 Oct 2014 17:40, p...@heypete.com said: > make -f build-aux/speedo.mk native > > it does quite a bit, but always seems to spit out the following errors > and fails to complete. The bit about gnutls is non-critical for me, > but it'd be nice to resolve it. The "required libraries not foun

Re: [Announce] The maybe final Beta for GnuPG 2.1

2014-10-03 Thread Pete Stephenson
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Werner Koch wrote: > Hello! > > I just released another *beta* version of GnuPG *2.1*. It has been > released to give you the opportunity to check out new features and to > help fixing bugs. Excellent! [snip] > GnuPG requires a couple of extra libraries, which n

[Announce] The maybe final Beta for GnuPG 2.1

2014-10-03 Thread Werner Koch
Hello! I just released another *beta* version of GnuPG *2.1*. It has been released to give you the opportunity to check out new features and to help fixing bugs. If you need a stable and fully maintained version of GnuPG, you should use version 2.0.26 or 1.4.18. This version is marked a