Peter Lebbing:
> On 08/12/16 21:42, Stephan Beck wrote:
>> [...], so I don't see the real need for a forced coexistence of the two
>> (or three) versions on Jessie.
>
> I did that because all the software in jessie that depends on GnuPG 1.4
> might not work with GnuPG 2.1. So by doing it like th
On 08/12/16 21:42, Stephan Beck wrote:
> [...], so I don't see the real need for a forced coexistence of the two
> (or three) versions on Jessie.
I did that because all the software in jessie that depends on GnuPG 1.4
might not work with GnuPG 2.1. So by doing it like this, I'm not
breaking any pa
I discovered I accidentally wasn't allowing public access to the
repository. I've fixed this and you can now download from:
https://gitlab.com/DigitalBrains1/alt-debian-gnupg2
The offending setting seemed to have been:
Feature Visibility
- Repository
Push files to be stored in this project
No
Teemu Likonen:
> Peter Lebbing [2016-12-08 18:12:50+01] wrote:
>
>> I forked the Debian git repo for GnuPG 2.1 [1], and had a go at what
>> was primarily the reversal of the changes introduced by 2.1.11-7+exp1.
>> You can find the result at GitLab at [2].
>
> Thanks. I'm not brave enough to try
Peter Lebbing [2016-12-08 18:12:50+01] wrote:
> I forked the Debian git repo for GnuPG 2.1 [1], and had a go at what
> was primarily the reversal of the changes introduced by 2.1.11-7+exp1.
> You can find the result at GitLab at [2].
Thanks. I'm not brave enough to try it yet. I wonder what is th
Hello dkg and list!
Let me start out by thanking Daniel Kahn Gillmor for all his work on GnuPG and
its Debian packages. And also thanks to all the other devs!
I'd like to use the latest GnuPG 2.1 on my Debian jessie machines. When the
Debian package went from version 2.1.11-7 to 2.1.11-7+exp1, it
