Am 28 Feb 2008 um 10:04 hat Wilhelm Müller geschrieben:
> > On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:23:34 -0500, David Shaw
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> David> Why?
>
> David> I'm serious - what is the use case here? How often do
> David> people need to list all recipients of a file?
>
> I a
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:23:34 -0500, David Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
David> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 06:55:28PM +0100, Dirk Traulsen wrote:
[...]
>> > >C:\>gpg --recipient-keys ENCRYPTED_FILE.gpg
[...]
>> So at least three people think it would be a good addition.
Am 27 Feb 2008 um 13:23 hat David Shaw geschrieben:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 06:55:28PM +0100, Dirk Traulsen wrote:
> > > >What I meant, was something like this mockup:
> > > ==
> > > >C:\>gpg --recipient-keys ENCRYPTED_FILE.gpg
> > > >gpg: file ENCRYPTED_FILE.gpg was encrypted to th
Am 27 Feb 2008 um 19:47 hat Werner Koch geschrieben:
> The solution to this is pretty clear, we need to read all public key
> encrypted packets first and sort them so that own keys come first
> followed by other keys and finally by the wild card keys. This also
> allows us to order the trial decr
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:17:01 -0500 John Clizbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>>>By the way:
>>> gpg --no-default-keyring --secret-keyring /dev/null the-
>file.gpg
>>
>> what is the correct command on Windows ?
>
>gpg --no-default-keyring --secret-keyring nul the-file.gpg
i can't get it to work :-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> David Shaw dshaw at jabberwocky.com
> wrote on Wed Feb 27 19:23:34 CET 2008 :
>
>>By the way:
>> gpg --no-default-keyring --secret-keyring /dev/null the-file.gpg
>
> what is the correct command on Windows ?
gpg --no-default-keyring --secret-keyring nul the-file.gpg
o
David Shaw dshaw at jabberwocky.com
wrote on Wed Feb 27 19:23:34 CET 2008 :
>By the way:
> gpg --no-default-keyring --secret-keyring /dev/null the-file.gpg
.....
what is the correct command on 'windows' ?
TIA,
vedaal
any ads or links
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> pressing the 'enter' key 9 times quickly, is something i can live
> with without bothering the developers
Well, I sometimes receive mails encrypted to 20 or so keys and some of
them use the wild card keyid (-R) feature. Now, this is not a pro
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 06:55:28PM +0100, Dirk Traulsen wrote:
> > >What I meant, was something like this mockup:
> > ==
> > >C:\>gpg --recipient-keys ENCRYPTED_FILE.gpg
> > >gpg: file ENCRYPTED_FILE.gpg was encrypted to the following keys:
> >
> >
> > i agree, and would welcome th
Am 27 Feb 2008 um 9:51 hat [EMAIL PROTECTED] geschrieben:
> Dirk Traulsen dirk.traulsen at lypso.de
> wrote on Wed Feb 27 10:00:25 CET 2008
>
> >You don't believe me to enter 9 times a complete passphrase, do
> you?
>
> i agree with you completely that it would be a major annoyance to
> have t
vedaal at hush.com vedaal at hush.com
wrote o Wed Feb 27 15:51:05 CET 2008
>What I meant, was something like this mockup:
==
>C:\>gpg --recipient-keys ENCRYPTED_FILE.gpg
>gpg: file ENCRYPTED_FILE.gpg was encrypted to the following keys:
actually, gnupg already does this when decr
Dirk Traulsen dirk.traulsen at lypso.de
wrote on Wed Feb 27 10:00:25 CET 2008
>You don't believe me to enter 9 times a complete passphrase, do
you?
i agree with you completely that it would be a major annoyance to
have to enter a complete passphrase, even 3 times,
and certainly would be very a
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 10:00 +0100, Dirk Traulsen wrote:
> You don't believe me to enter 9 times a complete passphrase, do you?
> You are right, that it is possible to live with it, but why not
> implement something more comfortable if it doesn't lower the security
> level?
>
>
> While pgpdum
Am 26 Feb 2008 um 9:55 hat [EMAIL PROTECTED] geschrieben:
>
> Am 26 Feb 2008 um 8:48 hat [EMAIL PROTECTED] geschrieben:
> >
> >1. If there are several recipients, test the given passphrase
> >automatically for all secret keys in your keyring, so that you don't
> >have to give for example 9 times
>Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:48:57 +0100
>From: "Dirk Traulsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: How know who is a file encrypted for ?
>1. If there are several recipients, test the given passphrase
>automatically for all secret keys in your keyring, so that
Am 26 Feb 2008 um 9:40 hat Sven Radde geschrieben:
> Hi!
>
> Dirk Traulsen schrieb:
> > b. some keys do not belong to me in a common keyring.
>
> I am really not sure whether that is a good idea at all. Granting other
> people (write!) access to my secret keyring would be a troubling
> thought,
Hi!
Dirk Traulsen schrieb:
b. some keys do not belong to me in a common keyring.
I am really not sure whether that is a good idea at all.
Granting other people (write!) access to my secret keyring would be a
troubling thought, even though I am not currently aware of any practical
exploits.
k Traulsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Cc: GnuPG mailing list
> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 12:27:56 PM
> Subject: Re: How know who is a file encrypted for ?
>
>
> Am
> 25
> Feb
> 2008
> um
> 8:01
> hat
> Tracy
> D.
> Bos
ow who is a file encrypted for ?
Am
25
Feb
2008
um
8:01
hat
Tracy
D.
Bossong
geschrieben:
>
gpg
--list-packets
should
give
you
a
clue
No,
it
does
not!
does
the
same
as
.
The
only
difference
is
that
gpg
gives
additional
packet
information
before
as
Am 25 Feb 2008 um 8:01 hat Tracy D. Bossong geschrieben:
> gpg --list-packets should give you a clue
No, it does not!
does the same as .
The only difference is that gpg gives additional packet information
before asking the passphrases three times for each recipient. So the
described prob
On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 08:01 -0800, Tracy D. Bossong wrote:
> gpg --list-packets should give you a clue
>
Yes true! I'm not use using it cos it's only mentioned in man page and
not in help (and I don't rtfm enough ;)
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
gpg --list-packets should give you a clue
- Original Message
From: Sebastien Chassot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Dirk Traulsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: GnuPG mailing list
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 7:29:43 AM
Subject: Re: How know who is a file encrypted for ?
On
M
On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 09:59 +0100, Dirk Traulsen wrote:
> If you are the third recipient, you have to give 6 times a wrong
> password until you can finally input the correct one. This gets real
> fun when there are ten recipients...
>
> It would be nice, if
> 1. gpg would take the password an
Am 8 Feb 2008 um 15:23 hat David Shaw geschrieben:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 09:07:21PM +0100, Sebastien Chassot wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I can't find how list who's a file encrypted for ? I've encrypt several
> > files with different recipients, but I don't remember which.
>
> Just run 'gpg' on t
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 09:07:21PM +0100, Sebastien Chassot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can't find how list who's a file encrypted for ? I've encrypt several
> files with different recipients, but I don't remember which.
>
> In general how can I make difference between file encrypted for one
> user, sever
Hi,
I can't find how list who's a file encrypted for ? I've encrypt several
files with different recipients, but I don't remember which.
In general how can I make difference between file encrypted for one
user, several user ? symmetric encrypted, asymmetric ?
Thank you.
--
Sebastien
26 matches
Mail list logo
