-- Forwarded message --
> From: "Robert J. Hansen"
> To: Faramir
> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:45:32 -0500
> Subject: Re: recover private key
> (This email is for jakse, although I'm responding to Faramir's email.)
>
> [snip]
>
> U
Yes, Robert, that is possible. However, IIRC, signatures come with a
time stamp. In the case I am envisioning, the quotER is taking it from
somwhere, and the quotEE can show the prior, complete post.
Yes, this does not prevent someone from pre-creating two different
messages, but someone resorting
Avi wrote:
> For example, given the possibility of a piece of an e-mail being
> quoted out of context, signing my messages allows me to
> demonstrate the totality of what I did write at the time I wrote
> it, so I have a recourse to show the entire post and its
> context. The same would apply for t
Avi wrote:
> Yes, Robert, that is possible. However, IIRC, signatures come with a
> time stamp.
The OpenPGP time stamp is not a trusted timestamp and should not be
relied upon for any trusted purpose.
> In the case I am envisioning, the quotER is taking it from
> somwhere, and the quotEE can show
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Robert J. Hansen escribió:
...
> If the person presenting you with a quote also includes the signature of
> the message they're quoting, though, then yes, this becomes possible.
> But if they're excerpting you, odds are good they don't have your sign
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> Avi wrote:
> > Yes, Robert, that is possible. However, IIRC, signatures come with a
> > time stamp.
>
> The OpenPGP time stamp is not a trusted timestamp and should not be
> relied upon for any trusted purpose.
Point taken.
>
>
> > In
Avi wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>
> There's no pre-creation necessary in the scenario I outlined. Maybe I
> just know an uncommon class of scoundrels, but that level of
> skulduggery is fairly tame in my experience.
>
>
> Again, point taken, a
