-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2014-11-22 20:23, Dave Pawson wrote:
> Not found for Fedora.
It can be done for Fedora. You'll need to download the portable
version of Keepass2 from the official website, and install the Mono
runtimes and xdotool.
After extracting the keepass2
On 22/11/14 11:11, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> If I look at the KeePass website, specifically at [1], I see:
Whoops!
[1] http://keepass.info/help/v2/setup.html#mono
--
I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) in combination with Enigmail.
You can send me encrypted mail if you want some privacy.
My key is
On 22/11/14 10:23, Dave Pawson wrote:
> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keepass2
>
> Looks like Ubuntu only?
>
> Not found for Fedora.
If I look at the KeePass website, specifically at [1], I see:
8< -- >8
In addition to Windows, KeePass 2.x ru
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/keepass2
Looks like Ubuntu only?
Not found for Fedora.
I'll stick with symmetric for now.
Thanks Jason
On 22 November 2014 08:47, Jason Antony wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 2014-11-22 18:54, Dave Pawson wrote:
>
>> I ins
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2014-11-22 18:54, Dave Pawson wrote:
> I installed keepassx. Not much use to me. 1. Illegible with my
> eyesight (reported to them) 2. Insufficient fields (seems to be non
> expandable).
Try Keepass2 (official). It worked fine for me when I last
I installed keepassx. Not much use to me.
1. Illegible with my eyesight (reported to them)
2. Insufficient fields (seems to be non expandable).
regards
On 22 November 2014 02:37, Doug Barton wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 11/20/14 10:40 AM, Dave Pawson wrote:
>
Thanks Doug
On 22 November 2014 02:37, Doug Barton wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Either symmetric or PK encryption would suit your needs, but as
> someone pointed out already, a better solution is to use a password safe.
>
> KeePass is an excellent solution, and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 11/20/14 10:40 AM, Dave Pawson wrote:
| Requirement. Two machines (one Linux, one Windows).
|
| I want a secure file 'shared' between them, as a pwd-safe.
|
| Only I use the two machines, but need the file encrypted.
|
| Any alternatives to symme
1. A matter of trust (low)
2. One mc is Linux, the other windows - they tend not to mix?
Tks, Dave
On 21 November 2014 18:36, Schlacta, Christ wrote:
> For a password safe you might look into existing solutions, such as
> keepass(x) or other similar password storage solutions
>
> On Nov 21, 2014
For a password safe you might look into existing solutions, such as
keepass(x) or other similar password storage solutions
On Nov 21, 2014 10:29 AM, "Dave Pawson" wrote:
> Thanks Robert. I'll give it a try.
>
> regards Dave P
>
> On 21 November 2014 18:24, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> >> Only I use
Thanks Robert. I'll give it a try.
regards Dave P
On 21 November 2014 18:24, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> Only I use the two machines, but need the file encrypted.
>>
>> Any alternatives to symmetrical encryption of a file?
>
>
> Not really. Sym would appear to be ideal for your use case.
>
>
> _
Only I use the two machines, but need the file encrypted.
Any alternatives to symmetrical encryption of a file?
Not really. Sym would appear to be ideal for your use case.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/ma
Requirement.
Two machines (one Linux, one Windows).
I want a secure file 'shared' between them, as a pwd-safe.
Only I use the two machines, but need the file encrypted.
Any alternatives to symmetrical encryption of a file?
TiA,
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson
13 matches
Mail list logo
