Re: Core release, Wed

2005-07-20 Thread Adam Fedor
On Jul 20, 2005, at 6:14 AM, Nicola Pero wrote: I believe the problem is that if you switch to the new -make package, you have to recompile everything from scratch (which I didn't, I reverted to the old gnustep-make as you did). :-( My understanding is that before the change, we linked a

Re: GNUStep make patch take 1

2005-07-20 Thread Nicola Pero
Thanks Jeremy, good patch! :-) Adam is doing a release today (I think), so I didn't want to make too many changes [in case I break more than I fix ;-)]; I've committed the fix for frameworks with subprojects on mingw32 though. I'll work on the other changes after the release ... I suspect Adam

Re: Core release, Wed

2005-07-20 Thread Nicola Pero
This makes upgrades a bit cumbersome as you have to upgrade everything, but well that's why we're making a major release I suppose. ;-) Well, I can revert the make part of the patch. It shouldn't be a problem to have lobjc linked multiple times. My personal suggestion would be to

Re: GCC 4.x and ObjC/ObjC++ type encodings

2005-07-20 Thread David Ayers
Ziemowit Laski wrote: As some of you may have noticed, the Objective-C method signature, instance variable and type encodings (including @encode expressions) have changed between GCC 3.X and GCC 4.X series of compilers. The GCC 4.X implementation, although suffering from a couple of bugs, is