On 27 Jan 2007, at 19:59, Adam Fedor wrote:
On Jan 26, 2007, at 10:13 AM, Guenther Noack wrote:
Speaking of GNUstep bugfix releases, what happened to the release of
version 1.13.1, that fixes the buffer overflow issue I reported (
https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?18366)? I've seen that the st
On Jan 26, 2007, at 10:13 AM, Guenther Noack wrote:
Speaking of GNUstep bugfix releases, what happened to the release of
version 1.13.1, that fixes the buffer overflow issue I reported (
https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?18366)? I've seen that the stable
branch
is tagged 1.13.1 now, but there's
Hi!
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 11:02:21AM +, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
> I agree with that, but the fact is that we haven't done that in the
> past, so if we are going to start we need a policy decision that
> bugfixes are to be backported from trunk to the stable branch [...]
This soun
Adam Fedor schrieb:
>
> On Jan 26, 2007, at 7:48 AM, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
>
>>
>> On 24 Jan 2007, at 16:36, Ted Howard wrote:
>> Perhaps a bigger issue is that my compiler (gcc-4.1.1) happily
>> compiles the current code! Now that seems to me like a rather severe
>> compiler bug. Does
Hi there,
If anyone in this list is in Brazil and is interested in a dead mono
turbo station, drop me a message. I need the space, and maybe someone
more knowledgeable in electronics than me might bring it back to life.
I am not selling it, but I have to get rid of it. I just would rather
give it
Test results for GNUstep as of Sat Jan 27 06:34:15 EST 2007
If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will
be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm
If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see
http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/Developer_FAQ#How_ca
