Richard Frith-Macdonald schrieb:
On 9 Feb 2007, at 17:55, Xavier Glattard wrote:
phew !
My brain boiled three times (and fried twice) before
i understand anything...
And many pieces of code are still quite obscure to me.
I would not be a very good compiler.
But i found out what you
Test results for GNUstep as of Sat Feb 10 06:34:15 EST 2007
If a particular system failed compilation, the logs for that system will
be placed at ftp://ftp.gnustep.org/pub/testfarm
If you would like to be a part of this automated testfarm, see
Wim Oudshoorn schrieb:
Matt Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 2007-02-09 09:18:02 -0800 Wim Oudshoorn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So next I tried to download pkg-config version 0.21 and compile it
(on
MS Windows). Of course that failed because I hadn't installed glib.
So
I gave up. (I tried
On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 05:46:15PM -0800, Matt Rice wrote:
alright i commited this stuff and some documentation fixes..
so yes i believe it should all be resolved.
Great! Thanks for the fix! :-)
-G?nther
___
Gnustep-dev mailing list
On Feb 8, 2007, at 14:13, Nicola Pero wrote:
Here is an example -- put this at the top of your GNUmakefile, just
before include $(GNUSTEP_MAKEFILES)/common.make --
GNUSTEP_MAKEFILES = $(word 1, \
$(wildcard /usr/GNUstep/System/Library/Makefiles) \
$(wildcard
Hi,
I've tagged SOPE 4.6beta and bumped SOPE trunk to 4.7. Same goes for
JOPE 1.2/1.3.
Greets,
Helge
--
Helge Hess
http://www.helgehess.eu/
___
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
On 2007-02-10 05:20:45 -0800 Fred Kiefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wim Oudshoorn schrieb:
Matt Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 2007-02-09 09:18:02 -0800 Wim Oudshoorn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So next I tried to download pkg-config version 0.21 and compile it
(on
MS Windows). Of course that
On 2007-02-10 09:27:32 -0800 Nicola Pero
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a quick test of a makefile executing pkg-config 1000 times takes
about 6
seconds..
say there are 5 invocations of pkg-config per invocation of make...
thats
200 make processes.
Wow - that would be a massive overhead ...
I haven't followed this in particular detail, and I haven't looked at
the actual work you have done, so I might well be missing some points
or misunderstanding ... sorry, just haven't had time.
First I'll say how I think pkg-config could be useful for GNUstep.
Then I'll address points in
On 2007-02-10 11:48:55 -0800 Richard Frith-Macdonald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't followed this in particular detail, and I haven't looked at
the
actual work you have done, so I might well be missing some points or
misunderstanding ... sorry, just haven't had time.
First I'll say
On 2007-02-10 11:48:55 -0800 Richard Frith-Macdonald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current setup was particularly designed to 'play nice with the
rest of
the world'.
You can't get much nicer than a file in a standard location which
both the
shell and makefiles can use. A pkg-config file
Wim Oudshoorn wrote:
Hm, I just read part of this discussion.
Apparently pkg-config is a very popular tool for
finding dependencies etc. Also it seems to be used
by plenty of libraries and people, although I never encountered
it in practice. For me a .pc is probably a mystery.
So before
Third, Nicola keeps on claiming in this thread that a standard GNUstep
could be compiled by just setting the values in GNUstep.conf and doing
nothing else. This does not work for me, I still need to source
GNUstep.sh to get things working. Otherwise the compilation of gui
complains that it
The only objection i've heard from gnustep.pc is Its not the way
GNUstep stores information.
Here is a refresher --
1. it adds an external dependency upon which *everything* would depend
2. it is slower
3. it is designed for something else (which adds complexity)
4. it requires
I like the idea of your patch, so I rewrote the shell script and committed it.
Thanks!
___
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
On 2007-02-10 17:35:44 -0800 Nicola Pero
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like the idea of your patch, so I rewrote the shell script and
committed it.
Thanks!
so can we change everything to
GNUSTEP_MAKEFILES ?= $(shell gnustep-config.sh GNUSTEP_MAKEFILES)
include
On 2007-02-10 17:34:59 -0800 Nicola Pero
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only objection i've heard from gnustep.pc is Its not the way
GNUstep
stores information.
Here is a refresher --
1. it adds an external dependency upon which *everything* would depend
an entirely optional dependency,
Hi
I usually try to avoid playing with GNUstep on Windows as it always
takes too long to setup an environment to run stuff in, but these
pkg-config discussions drew me back in.
Wim Oudshoorn schrieb:
Well, did you actually try compiling pkg-config?
I did not investigate deeply but the
Hi
Sorry for the late reply, been busy with other stuff.
Weird! Which back-end are you using? Win32? If so, I thought we were
going that in favor of cairo under win32. Has that not happened yet. As
Not as far as I can see in SVN. From what I can work out, there exists a
few patches to get
On 2007-02-10 20:46:30 -0800 Christopher Armstrong
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Considering some of the effort needed to get pkg-config working on
Windows, could we please maintain all existing build methods in
gnustep-make? IMHO pkg-config still feels like a alpha quality
programme
in some
On 11 Feb 2007, at 00:38, Nicola Pero wrote:
Third, Nicola keeps on claiming in this thread that a standard
GNUstep
could be compiled by just setting the values in GNUstep.conf and
doing
nothing else. This does not work for me, I still need to source
GNUstep.sh to get things working.
On 11 Feb 2007, at 04:33, Matt Rice wrote:
On 2007-02-10 17:34:59 -0800 Nicola Pero [EMAIL PROTECTED]
innovation.com wrote:
The only objection i've heard from gnustep.pc is Its not the way
GNUstep stores information.
Here is a refresher --
1. it adds an external dependency upon which
22 matches
Mail list logo
