I'll be leaving for FOSDEM tomorrow morning and won't be home again
until Monday evening.
My availability on email over that period will be very patchy.
Hope to see a few of you there.
___
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu
Have a safe trip.
Gregory Casamento -- Principal Consultant - OLC, Inc
# GNUstep Chief Maintainer
From: Richard Frith-Macdonald
To: Developer GNUstep
Sent: Wednesday, February 4, 2009 12:23:30 PM
Subject: Off to FOSDEM
I'll be leaving for FOSDEM tomorrow m
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Richard Frith-Macdonald
wrote:
> I'll be leaving for FOSDEM tomorrow morning and won't be home again until
> Monday evening.
> My availability on email over that period will be very patchy.
> Hope to see a few of you there.
Well on my side, it looks I may only
In some cases on Mac OS X I have observed that exceptions which are not
fatal on Mac sometimes ARE fatal on GNUstep. I believe we should change
the logic which deals with exceptions to add a "continue" button and only
show the panel when the application is running in debug mode. This would
allo
On 4 Feb 2009, at 18:53, Gregory Casamento wrote:
In some cases on Mac OS X I have observed that exceptions which are
not fatal on Mac sometimes ARE fatal on GNUstep. I believe we
should change the logic which deals with exceptions to add a
"continue" button and only show the panel when
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Richard Frith-Macdonald
wrote:
>
> On 4 Feb 2009, at 18:53, Gregory Casamento wrote:
>
>> In some cases on Mac OS X I have observed that exceptions which are not
>> fatal on Mac sometimes ARE fatal on GNUstep. I believe we should change
>> the logic which deals w
This is what I was thinking... the reason I'm thinking about this is because
I am working on porting a few apps and exception which show up in the log on
Mac OS X cause GNUstep to die.
GC
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Matt Rice wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Richard Frith-Macdonald
On 4 Feb 2009, at 18:53, Gregory Casamento wrote:
In some cases on Mac OS X I have observed that exceptions which are
not fatal on Mac sometimes ARE fatal on GNUstep. I believe we
should change the logic which deals with exceptions to add a
"continue" button and only show the panel when t
I definitely think we should implement something similar. It would help a
great deal with some porting efforts.
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 3:03 PM, David Chisnall wrote:
> On 4 Feb 2009, at 18:53, Gregory Casamento wrote:
>
> In some cases on Mac OS X I have observed that exceptions which are not
On Feb 4, 2009, at 1:23 PM, Gregory Casamento wrote:
I definitely think we should implement something similar. It would
help a great deal with some porting efforts.
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 3:03 PM, David Chisnall
wrote:
On 4 Feb 2009, at 18:53, Gregory Casamento wrote:
In some cases on
On 4 Feb 2009, at 20:23, Gregory Casamento wrote:
I definitely think we should implement something similar. It would
help a great deal with some porting efforts.
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 3:03 PM, David Chisnall
wrote:
On 4 Feb 2009, at 18:53, Gregory Casamento wrote:
In some cases on Ma
Am Mittwoch, den 04.02.2009, 23:52 -0500 schrieb Gregory Casamento:
> The attached test program does not crash on Mac OS X when the button
> is pressed, but does crash on GNUstep. The button calls the "action:"
> method in Controller which immediately throws an exception.
>
> I believe this confi
David,
Simply because an exception is thrown and not caught does not necessarily mean
that the application is in an unknown state.
Indeed some applications may have come to rely on this behavior and it makes it
very difficult to port applications which do this without refactoring.
As far as be
On 5 Feb 2009, at 05:50, David Ayers wrote:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/discuss-gnustep/2004-10/
msg00092.html
I still believe that handling generic handling of exceptions in the
runloop is a dangerously wrong and an implementation detail that we
shouldn't try to be compatible with. B
On 5 Feb 2009, at 06:15, Gregory John Casamento wrote:
David,
Simply because an exception is thrown and not caught does not
necessarily mean that the application is in an unknown state.
That really depends on your use of the work 'unknown'. Obviously if
I've planned it, or if I catch it
Richard,
"True. Such applications are fundamentally badly designed/buggy, but it
generally doesn't win you any friends to say so."
That could be true, but I don't believe, however, that GNUstep should fail
where Cocoa recovers.
The fact of the matter is that differences like this fundamenta
On 5 Feb 2009, at 07:23, Gregory John Casamento wrote:
Richard,
"True. Such applications are fundamentally badly designed/buggy,
but it generally doesn't win you any friends to say so."
That could be true, but I don't believe, however, that GNUstep
should fail where Cocoa recovers.
I'
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 9:50 PM, David Ayers wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 04.02.2009, 23:52 -0500 schrieb Gregory Casamento:
>> The attached test program does not crash on Mac OS X when the button
>> is pressed, but does crash on GNUstep. The button calls the "action:"
>> method in Controller which i
18 matches
Mail list logo