My point was simply that David may have some specific facts with
respect to how he developed the library which were important. As you
can see, he did.
Nevertheless, now that everyone has had a chance to weigh in, I don't
see any point in continuing this thread.
Later, GC
On Tuesday, September 1
Since then, every file from GCC libobjc has been replaced with a new
file (or files) implementing similar functionality.
Great
You should audit the code and make sure there are no lines left which
are derived from libobjc (no matter how irrelevant
they seem) then add a README that clearly
В Mon, 13 Sep 2010 12:58:20 +0100, David Chisnall написа:
>> GNU ObjC
>> has so few users that it seems hardly worth the effort to upgrade the
>> GNU ObjC front end to ObjC 2.0. And there are other issues:
>
> Translation: The GNU project doesn't care about GNUstep.
Wrong.
A plea for help has be
