building cmake itself, it is a hard thing
to do really; worse than GCC.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
For OS X users, there's a nice CMake GUI that lets you generate XCode project
files, which I imagine would be very attractive to users wanting to run
GNUstep code on that platform. The generated XCode
On Sep 18, 2010, at 11:31 AM, David Chisnall thera...@sucs.org wrote:
On 18 Sep 2010, at 19:24, Nicola Pero wrote:
I'd suggest that libobjc2 could include a minimal Object
implementation.
Having Object is handy to perform simple configure tests and both
the Apple
and GNU runtime include
On Sep 13, 2010, at 6:08 AM, David Chisnall thera...@sucs.org wrote:
On 13 Sep 2010, at 13:53, Vincent Richomme wrote:
GNU ObjC has so few users that it seems hardly worth the effort
In the same time do you have an idea of how many people are
interested
in gnustep ?
I would be very
at GPLv3 code.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
___
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Pete French p...@twisted.org.uk wrote:
All the rest of the email, however, I agree with - the lack of
ObjC maintenance on GCC worries me greatly. I depend on this
stuff for my living, and for my business to make sales. Having
somewhere else to jump to would
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Pete French p...@twisted.org.uk wrote:
Well if your business depends on it, you might want to hire someone
someone to do the development.
Well, that would be me. But I kind of have a lot of other stuff to
do. I'll reprhrase it as I dont want to take this on
new functions something like this:
Yes in fact it was on my list of things TODO, see
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27466 :).
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
___
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo
that the overheads
are high.
The overhead be non existent if there are no exceptions thrown (when
using dwarf2 unwinding based exceptions which most targets use
already). The only overhead is data size increases.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
___
Gnustep-dev mailing
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Richard Frith-Macdonald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So this would appear to be a rather severe drawback as invocations are used
quite extensively. Maybe the stack unwinding works if you used libffi for
your invocations, but libffi doesn't work on some platforms
anymore so some would have to investigate, but I think the
approach to really fix the issue is that we need
No, the windows threading is also supported, so are some variants of
the POSIX threads (the 95 version in fact for older Solaris's).
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
FYI.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Anthony Green [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:16 PM
Subject: Announcing libffi 3.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm pleased to announce a software release 10 years in the
making:
libffi
3.0
libffi is a
On 6/29/07, Yen-Ju Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe it is worth to wait and see how other big projects do,
like GCC and GNOME.
And see how it affects some aspects where GNUstep will be used,
like web services (GNUstepWeb) or embedded system (mSTEP).
GCC has been requested (required) to move
On 3/21/07, Xavier Glattard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Without the change i got :
So these names are not exported properly.
I dont know why but mingw32 seems to be special... :-\
Is libobjc being compiled as a static library? I bet that is the real
issue here.
-- Pinski
, you might want to
fittle with the .def file, and then fix the other part of the makefile
to always build it, libtool way of building a .dll might be the way to
go.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
libobjc maintainer :)
___
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev
On 3/19/07, Michael Gardner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, regarding the problem configuring gnustep-make with
--enable-native-objc-exceptions: I emailed the port's maintainer, and
he mentioned that he got the same result on his FreeBSD system. It
looks like a gcc bug to me, but can anyone
a compiler bug.
Oh, I know what this is now.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31089
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
___
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
On 3/15/07, Michael Gardner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/15/07, Andrew Pinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/15/07, Richard Frith-Macdonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought that compiling with '-x objective-c' was supposed to have
the same effect as compiling a file with a .m extension
On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 06:33 +0200, Nicola Pero wrote:
Anyway, let me know if '-g -O2' causes problems, I presume if the '-O2'
seriously confuse the debugger let me know and we can revert that change,
or maybe use '-g -O' ?
Use of -O2 makes debugging almost impossible ... with that
On May 13, 2006, at 2:59 PM, Oliver Langer wrote:
Hi,
i got stock on an linker problem and maybe someone can help me...:
On my OS X 10.4 box using gcc-4.0.1 my linker tells me
ld: Undefined symbols:
__Unwind_Resume
I am using the following gcc-params: -prebind -dynamiclib -
lpthread
On Dec 20, 2005, at 6:34 PM, David Wetzel wrote:
hi folks,
I just red that
@synchronized does not work with the GNU runtime yet. There is a bug
in gcc's
bugzilla to record that fact. I just have not got around to fixing it
yet.
-- Pinski
On Oct 5, 2005, at 10:52 PM, Nicola Pero wrote:
I automatically added in the internal/system ObjC flags (eg,
-fconstant-string-class=NSConstantString) though, I assume that's
required
to compile ObjC++. ;-)
Yes those should be required to compile obj-c++.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
21 matches
Mail list logo
