On 2007-03-20 19:22:00 +0100 Michael Hopkins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there some part of the Foundation API that lets me unambiguously
discover
the MAC address of the host running the application?
No, but you can use getaddrinfo(3) to obtain a socket address
structure, then loop through
Hello,
I guess something went wrong with the latest changes to NSImage (I
guess) -- see attachment. It kind of shows GNUMail's application
icon...
--
Chris
appicon.jpg
attachment: appicon.jpg
___
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
Hi,
I was wondering whether it wouldn't make sense to make all the
HAVE_xyz variables available that are defined during installation of
GNUstep. That would make it easier to program without having to check
first (again) whether GNUstep is compiled with, for example, pthread
or libxml
On 2006-09-12 13:38:40 +0200 Gürkan Sengün [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Indeed, especially if it looks like something I am used to, say
NeXTSTEP/OPENSTEP, Windows or Mac OS X. Please pretty please,
don't make new themes, new looks, another we are gnome, we
are cool, we are KDE, we are new,
On 2006-09-10 07:30:15 +0200 Patrick McFarland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sunday 10 September 2006 00:21, Adam Fedor wrote:
RMS has offered to put something on the gnu.org home page about
GNUstep. Any ideas what we should say or ask for? I had mentioned
that
we are trying to organize a
Hi,
I'm not sure if the following problem relates to this clean-up, but
after running a checkout, building and installing -make, I now get
Making all for library libgnustep-base...
Linking library libgnustep-base ...
gcc41: debug=: No such file or directory
gcc41: profile=: No such
On 2006-09-08 12:39:11 +0200 Nicola Pero
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry about that ... I'll start to do a bit of simplification now and
make
sure I test building gnustep-base properly. :-)
No problem.
It's not just base, basically all .../Library/Makefile/Instance/*.make
files are
On 2006-09-08 13:19:54 +0200 Nicola Pero
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please try again now ... which_lib is gone!! :-)
Works for me anyway.
Confirmed. Works again.
Cool,
--
Chris
___
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
On 2006-08-29 14:03:36 +0200 Quentin Mathé [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
May be the Summer of Code 2006 page which lists most of missing classes.
There is a link on the wiki front page: http://
mediawiki.gnustep.org/index.php/Summer_Of_Code_2006
Check the history of that page ;-)
But that's not
On 2006-08-27 22:35:37 +0200 Nicolas Roard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[...]
In fact... I'm starting more and more to think that GNUstep, instead
of trying to be a jack of all trades -- I mean, it's a programming
toolkit, no, a development environment with RAD, no, a web application
server, no, a
On 2006-08-26 14:32:02 +0200 Gregory John Casamento
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The code in gui and Gorm is frozen in preparation for the release.
Only
critical fixes to existing functionality should go in at this point.
I am attempting to stabilize Gorm and GUI for the release.
On a side
On 2006-08-26 18:27:12 +0200 Gregory John Casamento
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This would make a lot of sense although... I thought we already
had a
list like that here:
https://savannah.gnu.org/task/?group_id=99
It would be better to track this as a set of tasks so that the
process is
On 2006-02-24 11:07:47 +0100 Dennis Leeuw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Chris,
Would this also mean the we need a /System/Library/Inspectors
/System/Library/Finder /System/Library/TextConverters
/System/Library/GSPrinting just no name a view others that are
falling in the
same category. Or am
On 2006-02-26 03:12:10 +0100 Alex Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hear, Hear! This should be the default location. The other gnustep
junk can
still live in /usr/gnustep or wherever else, but the libs should be
in
*STANDARD FHS LOCATIONS*.
Uhm ... 'scuse me, this is all good and stuff, BUT...
Hi,
just a thought, but wouldn't it make sense to store SystemPreference
modules somewhere else instead of /System/Library/Bundles/ like
/System/Library/Preferences/ or sth similar?
I know, technically, they ARE bundles, but then again, logically
they are system preferences and IMHO should
Hi,
as the subject says, there is a typo in -visibleFrame.
Line 305 reads
switch (NSInterfaceStyleForKey(@NSIntefaceStyle, nil))
Obvioulsy this shoud read @NSInterfaceStyle instead.
--
Chris
___
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
On 2006-02-19 17:12:20 +0100 Helge Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[...]
(though I have the impression that gstep-base still contains too
much GS* stuff).
[...]
Amen to that.
--
Chris
___
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
Hi,
this is to let you know that the latest changes (made yesterday,
Friday) are breaking GNUMail.
I updated SVN, recompiled the whole enchilada, quit and restarted
GNUMail -- which almost immediately core dumped.
I moved my Mailbox folder out of the way and restarted GNUMail. It
rightfully
On 2006-02-18 21:54:22 +0100 Richard Frith-Macdonald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fixed ... thanks ... It didn't show up in my tests, but GNUMail
triggered it
every time so it was very easy to find.
Works like a charm again. Thanks!!
--
Chris
___
Hi,
FreeBSD doesn't have resolv, so GSLDAP won't link by default. The
following patch of Makefile.preamble checks whether the host OS is
FreeBSD and adds -lresolv to ADDITIONAL_LIB_DIRS if it isn't.
--- Makefile.preamble.ORG Sun Feb 12 12:12:29 2006
+++ Makefile.preamble Mon Feb
On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 11:07:40 +0200, Fabien wrote:
On 2005-09-23 09:33:43 +0200 Chris Vetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 08:48:17 +0200 Stefan wrote:
[...]
p.s.: If you are really decided to give away money from the GNUstep
fund,
then why not to use it for gaining more
On Mon, 5 Sep 2005 10:28:02, Riccardo wrote:
Hello,
could someone check if it is an easy work to make gnustep gui/back build
and link against libgif and not only libungif libraries too? Once,
[...]
The problem I see here is that Window Maker currently links against
libungif.
So if you want
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:41:00 Thierry DELHAISE wrote:
Hi the list,
[...]
So, what version of gcc do you suggest me? Does some of U have
experience ?
[...]
I'm currently running
chuck:cbv :0 uname -sr
FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE
with a 'stock' GCC 3.4.2 and haven't seen any problems so far.
--
--- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
Von: Patrick McFarland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED], discuss-gnustep@gnu.org,
gnustep-dev@gnu.org
Betreff: 9 out of 10 geniuses prefer GNUstep!
Datum: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 08:04:49 -0400
[...]
What do you think?
Excellent. Already use it as my default
24 matches
Mail list logo