Re: Hosts MAC address available from within Foundation?

2007-03-20 Thread Chris Vetter
On 2007-03-20 19:22:00 +0100 Michael Hopkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there some part of the Foundation API that lets me unambiguously discover the MAC address of the host running the application? No, but you can use getaddrinfo(3) to obtain a socket address structure, then loop through

Latest changes to NSImage(?)

2006-11-19 Thread Chris Vetter
Hello, I guess something went wrong with the latest changes to NSImage (I guess) -- see attachment. It kind of shows GNUMail's application icon... -- Chris appicon.jpg attachment: appicon.jpg ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org

configuration 'variables'

2006-09-22 Thread Chris Vetter
Hi, I was wondering whether it wouldn't make sense to make all the HAVE_xyz variables available that are defined during installation of GNUstep. That would make it easier to program without having to check first (again) whether GNUstep is compiled with, for example, pthread or libxml

Re: Advertisement for gnustep

2006-09-12 Thread Chris Vetter
On 2006-09-12 13:38:40 +0200 Gürkan Sengün [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Indeed, especially if it looks like something I am used to, say NeXTSTEP/OPENSTEP, Windows or Mac OS X. Please pretty please, don't make new themes, new looks, another we are gnome, we are cool, we are KDE, we are new,

Re: Advertisement for gnustep

2006-09-10 Thread Chris Vetter
On 2006-09-10 07:30:15 +0200 Patrick McFarland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 10 September 2006 00:21, Adam Fedor wrote: RMS has offered to put something on the gnu.org home page about GNUstep. Any ideas what we should say or ask for? I had mentioned that we are trying to organize a

Re: Removing all remaining distinction between shared, debug, profile and static libs/executables

2006-09-08 Thread Chris Vetter
Hi, I'm not sure if the following problem relates to this clean-up, but after running a checkout, building and installing -make, I now get Making all for library libgnustep-base... Linking library libgnustep-base ... gcc41: debug=: No such file or directory gcc41: profile=: No such

Re: Removing all remaining distinction between shared, debug, profile and static libs/executables

2006-09-08 Thread Chris Vetter
On 2006-09-08 12:39:11 +0200 Nicola Pero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry about that ... I'll start to do a bit of simplification now and make sure I test building gnustep-base properly. :-) No problem. It's not just base, basically all .../Library/Makefile/Instance/*.make files are

Re: Removing all remaining distinction between shared, debug, profile and static libs/executables

2006-09-08 Thread Chris Vetter
On 2006-09-08 13:19:54 +0200 Nicola Pero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please try again now ... which_lib is gone!! :-) Works for me anyway. Confirmed. Works again. Cool, -- Chris ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org

Re: GUI/Gorm code freeze

2006-08-29 Thread Chris Vetter
On 2006-08-29 14:03:36 +0200 Quentin Mathé [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: May be the Summer of Code 2006 page which lists most of missing classes. There is a link on the wiki front page: http:// mediawiki.gnustep.org/index.php/Summer_Of_Code_2006 Check the history of that page ;-) But that's not

Re: The need for an official GNUstep desktop

2006-08-27 Thread Chris Vetter
On 2006-08-27 22:35:37 +0200 Nicolas Roard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] In fact... I'm starting more and more to think that GNUstep, instead of trying to be a jack of all trades -- I mean, it's a programming toolkit, no, a development environment with RAD, no, a web application server, no, a

Re: GUI/Gorm code freeze

2006-08-26 Thread Chris Vetter
On 2006-08-26 14:32:02 +0200 Gregory John Casamento [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The code in gui and Gorm is frozen in preparation for the release. Only critical fixes to existing functionality should go in at this point. I am attempting to stabilize Gorm and GUI for the release. On a side

Re: GUI/Gorm code freeze

2006-08-26 Thread Chris Vetter
On 2006-08-26 18:27:12 +0200 Gregory John Casamento [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This would make a lot of sense although... I thought we already had a list like that here: https://savannah.gnu.org/task/?group_id=99 It would be better to track this as a set of tasks so that the process is

Re: SystemPreferences

2006-03-10 Thread Chris Vetter
On 2006-02-24 11:07:47 +0100 Dennis Leeuw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Chris, Would this also mean the we need a /System/Library/Inspectors /System/Library/Finder /System/Library/TextConverters /System/Library/GSPrinting just no name a view others that are falling in the same category. Or am

Re: libgnustep-base split proposal

2006-03-10 Thread Chris Vetter
On 2006-02-26 03:12:10 +0100 Alex Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hear, Hear! This should be the default location. The other gnustep junk can still live in /usr/gnustep or wherever else, but the libs should be in *STANDARD FHS LOCATIONS*. Uhm ... 'scuse me, this is all good and stuff, BUT...

SystemPreferences

2006-02-23 Thread Chris Vetter
Hi, just a thought, but wouldn't it make sense to store SystemPreference modules somewhere else instead of /System/Library/Bundles/ like /System/Library/Preferences/ or sth similar? I know, technically, they ARE bundles, but then again, logically they are system preferences and IMHO should

Typo in gui/NSScreen.m

2006-02-23 Thread Chris Vetter
Hi, as the subject says, there is a typo in -visibleFrame. Line 305 reads switch (NSInterfaceStyleForKey(@NSIntefaceStyle, nil)) Obvioulsy this shoud read @NSInterfaceStyle instead. -- Chris ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org

Re: libgnustep-base split proposal

2006-02-19 Thread Chris Vetter
On 2006-02-19 17:12:20 +0100 Helge Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] (though I have the impression that gstep-base still contains too much GS* stuff). [...] Amen to that. -- Chris ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org

Latest changes to -base in SVN trunk

2006-02-18 Thread Chris Vetter
Hi, this is to let you know that the latest changes (made yesterday, Friday) are breaking GNUMail. I updated SVN, recompiled the whole enchilada, quit and restarted GNUMail -- which almost immediately core dumped. I moved my Mailbox folder out of the way and restarted GNUMail. It rightfully

Re: Latest changes to -base in SVN trunk

2006-02-18 Thread Chris Vetter
On 2006-02-18 21:54:22 +0100 Richard Frith-Macdonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fixed ... thanks ... It didn't show up in my tests, but GNUMail triggered it every time so it was very easy to find. Works like a charm again. Thanks!! -- Chris ___

Patch for gsldap on FreeBSD

2006-02-13 Thread Chris Vetter
Hi, FreeBSD doesn't have resolv, so GSLDAP won't link by default. The following patch of Makefile.preamble checks whether the host OS is FreeBSD and adds -lresolv to ADDITIONAL_LIB_DIRS if it isn't. --- Makefile.preamble.ORG Sun Feb 12 12:12:29 2006 +++ Makefile.preamble Mon Feb

Re: GNUstep bounty

2005-09-23 Thread Chris Vetter
On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 11:07:40 +0200, Fabien wrote: On 2005-09-23 09:33:43 +0200 Chris Vetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 08:48:17 +0200 Stefan wrote: [...] p.s.: If you are really decided to give away money from the GNUstep fund, then why not to use it for gaining more

Re: gif and ungif libraries

2005-09-05 Thread Chris Vetter
On Mon, 5 Sep 2005 10:28:02, Riccardo wrote: Hello, could someone check if it is an easy work to make gnustep gui/back build and link against libgif and not only libungif libraries too? Once, [...] The problem I see here is that Window Maker currently links against libungif. So if you want

Re: [OSX to FreeBSD port] what version of gcc to use with 5.4

2005-07-25 Thread Chris Vetter
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:41:00 Thierry DELHAISE wrote: Hi the list, [...] So, what version of gcc do you suggest me? Does some of U have experience ? [...] I'm currently running chuck:cbv :0 uname -sr FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE with a 'stock' GCC 3.4.2 and haven't seen any problems so far. --

Re: 9 out of 10 geniuses prefer GNUstep!

2005-07-18 Thread Chris Vetter
--- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --- Von: Patrick McFarland [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: [EMAIL PROTECTED], discuss-gnustep@gnu.org, gnustep-dev@gnu.org Betreff: 9 out of 10 geniuses prefer GNUstep! Datum: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 08:04:49 -0400 [...] What do you think? Excellent. Already use it as my default