Re: GNUstep core release

2015-05-13 Thread Richard Frith-Macdonald
On 12 May 2015, at 22:35, Riccardo Mottola riccardo.mott...@libero.it wrote: Hi, Fred Kiefer wrote: Richard and I are planing to do a shared release of the GNUstep core modules (at least base, gui, back, maybe make as well) on May 15th. Could you all please test the current code and

Re: GNUstep core release

2015-05-13 Thread Fred Kiefer
Am 13.05.2015 um 08:09 schrieb Richard Frith-Macdonald richardfrithmacdon...@gmail.com: On 12 May 2015, at 22:35, Riccardo Mottola riccardo.mott...@libero.it wrote: Fred Kiefer wrote: Richard and I are planing to do a shared release of the GNUstep core modules (at least base, gui, back,

Re: GNUstep core release

2015-05-12 Thread Riccardo Mottola
Hi, Fred Kiefer wrote: Richard and I are planing to do a shared release of the GNUstep core modules (at least base, gui, back, maybe make as well) on May 15th. Could you all please test the current code and report any regressions. Up to this date we should all stop to add new features and

Re: GNUstep core release

2015-05-02 Thread Barnaby Jones
Not a regression but I get a lot of no-brainer warnings during compilation of the base package. For example this will create an error during runtime: NSCalendarDate.m:1778:7: warning: using integer absolute value function 'abs' when argument is of floating point type [-Wabsolute-value] a =

GNUstep core release

2015-04-30 Thread Fred Kiefer
Richard and I are planing to do a shared release of the GNUstep core modules (at least base, gui, back, maybe make as well) on May 15th. Could you all please test the current code and report any regressions. Up to this date we should all stop to add new features and restrict us to important bug

Re: Core release

2005-09-14 Thread Adam Fedor
On 2005-09-13 10:51:18 -0600 Adam Fedor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I hope to make a new core libraries release this week (sub-minor revision). Assuming I get the time. Also, anyone opposed to making the art back end the default? It's been this way in Startup for a while and there's

Re: Core release

2005-09-14 Thread Fred Kiefer
Adam Fedor wrote: On 2005-09-13 10:51:18 -0600 Adam Fedor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I hope to make a new core libraries release this week (sub-minor revision). Assuming I get the time. Also, anyone opposed to making the art back end the default? It's been this way in Startup for a while

Re: Core release

2005-09-14 Thread Gregory John Casamento
No objections here. GJC --- Adam Fedor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2005-09-13 10:51:18 -0600 Adam Fedor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I hope to make a new core libraries release this week (sub-minor revision). Assuming I get the time. Also, anyone opposed to making the art back

Core release

2005-09-13 Thread Adam Fedor
I hope to make a new core libraries release this week (sub-minor revision). Assuming I get the time. ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev

Re: Core release, Wed

2005-07-21 Thread Adam Fedor
On Jul 21, 2005, at 4:31 PM, Fred Kiefer wrote: Are you making a release of GUI and back as well? In the last few days I did get the basic cairo backend working again on the changed cairo code. If the back release isn't due in the next few days I'll add that code to CVS, if it's going out

Re: Core release, Wed

2005-07-21 Thread Gregory John Casamento
All, --- Adam Fedor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jul 21, 2005, at 4:31 PM, Fred Kiefer wrote: Are you making a release of GUI and back as well? In the last few days I did get the basic cairo backend working again on the changed cairo code. If the back release isn't due in the next

Re: Core release, Wed

2005-07-20 Thread Adam Fedor
On Jul 20, 2005, at 6:14 AM, Nicola Pero wrote: I believe the problem is that if you switch to the new -make package, you have to recompile everything from scratch (which I didn't, I reverted to the old gnustep-make as you did). :-( My understanding is that before the change, we linked a

Re: Core release, Wed

2005-07-20 Thread Nicola Pero
This makes upgrades a bit cumbersome as you have to upgrade everything, but well that's why we're making a major release I suppose. ;-) Well, I can revert the make part of the patch. It shouldn't be a problem to have lobjc linked multiple times. My personal suggestion would be to

Core release, Wed

2005-07-18 Thread Adam Fedor
I'm mostly satisfied with the libraries now, which is to say, I don't really have any time to make any significant changes. So I'll plan on freezing the release this Wednesday. Unless there are any objections. ___ Gnustep-dev mailing list

Re: Core release, Wed

2005-07-18 Thread Adam Fedor
On Jul 18, 2005, at 9:59 AM, Nicola Pero wrote: I'm mostly satisfied with the libraries now, which is to say, I don't really have any time to make any significant changes. So I'll plan on freezing the release this Wednesday. Unless there are any objections. The Windows pseudo-framework

Re: Core release, Wed

2005-07-18 Thread Fred Kiefer
Adam Fedor wrote: I'm mostly satisfied with the libraries now, which is to say, I don't really have any time to make any significant changes. So I'll plan on freezing the release this Wednesday. Unless there are any objections. Fine for me. I am still investigating on how best to implement