On 12 May 2015, at 22:35, Riccardo Mottola riccardo.mott...@libero.it wrote:
Hi,
Fred Kiefer wrote:
Richard and I are planing to do a shared release of the GNUstep core modules
(at least base, gui, back, maybe make as well) on May 15th. Could you all
please test the current code and
Am 13.05.2015 um 08:09 schrieb Richard Frith-Macdonald
richardfrithmacdon...@gmail.com:
On 12 May 2015, at 22:35, Riccardo Mottola riccardo.mott...@libero.it wrote:
Fred Kiefer wrote:
Richard and I are planing to do a shared release of the GNUstep core
modules (at least base, gui, back,
Hi,
Fred Kiefer wrote:
Richard and I are planing to do a shared release of the GNUstep core modules
(at least base, gui, back, maybe make as well) on May 15th. Could you all
please test the current code and report any regressions. Up to this date we
should all stop to add new features and
Not a regression but I get a lot of no-brainer warnings during
compilation of the base package.
For example this will create an error during runtime:
NSCalendarDate.m:1778:7: warning: using integer absolute value function
'abs' when argument is of floating point type [-Wabsolute-value]
a =
Richard and I are planing to do a shared release of the GNUstep core modules
(at least base, gui, back, maybe make as well) on May 15th. Could you all
please test the current code and report any regressions. Up to this date we
should all stop to add new features and restrict us to important bug
On 2005-09-13 10:51:18 -0600 Adam Fedor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hope to make a new core libraries release this week (sub-minor
revision).
Assuming I get the time.
Also, anyone opposed to making the art back end the default? It's been
this way in Startup for a while and there's
Adam Fedor wrote:
On 2005-09-13 10:51:18 -0600 Adam Fedor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hope to make a new core libraries release this week (sub-minor
revision). Assuming I get the time.
Also, anyone opposed to making the art back end the default? It's been
this way in Startup for a while
No objections here.
GJC
--- Adam Fedor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2005-09-13 10:51:18 -0600 Adam Fedor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hope to make a new core libraries release this week (sub-minor
revision).
Assuming I get the time.
Also, anyone opposed to making the art back
I hope to make a new core libraries release this week (sub-minor
revision). Assuming I get the time.
___
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
On Jul 21, 2005, at 4:31 PM, Fred Kiefer wrote:
Are you making a release of GUI and back as well? In the last few days
I
did get the basic cairo backend working again on the changed cairo
code.
If the back release isn't due in the next few days I'll add that code
to
CVS, if it's going out
All,
--- Adam Fedor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 21, 2005, at 4:31 PM, Fred Kiefer wrote:
Are you making a release of GUI and back as well? In the last few days
I
did get the basic cairo backend working again on the changed cairo
code.
If the back release isn't due in the next
On Jul 20, 2005, at 6:14 AM, Nicola Pero wrote:
I believe the problem is that if you switch to the new -make package,
you
have to recompile everything from scratch (which I didn't, I reverted
to
the old gnustep-make as you did). :-(
My understanding is that before the change, we linked a
This makes upgrades a bit cumbersome as you have to upgrade everything,
but well that's why we're making a major release I suppose. ;-)
Well, I can revert the make part of the patch. It shouldn't be a
problem to have lobjc linked multiple times.
My personal suggestion would be to
I'm mostly satisfied with the libraries now, which is to say, I don't
really have any time to make any significant changes. So I'll plan on
freezing the release this Wednesday. Unless there are any objections.
___
Gnustep-dev mailing list
On Jul 18, 2005, at 9:59 AM, Nicola Pero wrote:
I'm mostly satisfied with the libraries now, which is to say, I don't
really have any time to make any significant changes. So I'll plan on
freezing the release this Wednesday. Unless there are any objections.
The Windows pseudo-framework
Adam Fedor wrote:
I'm mostly satisfied with the libraries now, which is to say, I don't
really have any time to make any significant changes. So I'll plan on
freezing the release this Wednesday. Unless there are any objections.
Fine for me. I am still investigating on how best to implement
16 matches
Mail list logo