Frameworks on windows.

2005-06-27 Thread Jeremy Bettis
Let me share a few ideas here before I send in a patch so I can judge the likelyhood of it being accepted.   Assumptions: *) Frameworks depend heavily on symbolic links. (in gnustep-make) *) Windows (Mingw environment) has no symbolic links *) The Foo.framework/Versions/A/... is probably not

Re: Frameworks on windows.

2005-06-27 Thread Alex Perez
Jeremy Bettis wrote: Let me share a few ideas here before I send in a patch so I can judge the likelyhood of it being accepted. Assumptions: *) Frameworks depend heavily on symbolic links. (in gnustep-make) *) Windows (Mingw environment) has no symbolic links You are misinformed. There is a

Re: Frameworks on windows.

2005-06-28 Thread David Ayers
Alex Perez wrote: > Jeremy Bettis wrote: > >> Let me share a few ideas here before I send in a patch so I can judge >> the likelyhood of it being accepted. >> >> Assumptions: >> *) Frameworks depend heavily on symbolic links. (in gnustep-make) >> *) Windows (Mingw environment) has no symbolic li

Re: Frameworks on windows.

2005-06-28 Thread Alex Perez
David Ayers wrote: Alex Perez wrote: Jeremy Bettis wrote: Let me share a few ideas here before I send in a patch so I can judge the likelyhood of it being accepted. Assumptions: *) Frameworks depend heavily on symbolic links. (in gnustep-make) *) Windows (Mingw environment) has no symbolic

Re: Frameworks on windows.

2005-06-28 Thread David Ayers
Alex Perez wrote: > David Ayers wrote: > >> Frameworks (or true frameworks as some people call them) currently only >> work on Darwin (and for Matt Rice ;-) ). Matt has a set of patches that >> actually add framework support to glibc, binutils and gcc for gnu-linux >> (and possibly gnu-hurd). H

Re: Frameworks on windows.

2005-06-28 Thread Matt Rice
--- Alex Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David Ayers wrote: > > Alex Perez wrote: > > > >>Jeremy Bettis wrote: > >> > >> > >>>Let me share a few ideas here before I send in a > patch so I can judge > >>>the likelyhood of it being accepted. > >>> > >>>Assumptions: > >>>*) Frameworks depend h

Re: Frameworks on windows.

2005-06-28 Thread Jeremy Bettis
- Original Message - From: "Alex Perez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 11:52 PM Subject: Re: Frameworks on windows. Jeremy Bettis wrote: Let me share a few ideas here before I send in a patch so I can judge the likelyhood of it being accepte

Re: Frameworks on windows.

2005-06-28 Thread David Ayers
a junction below it will delete the contents of the junction (or reparse or whatever it's called). I'll leave it up to those who feel responsible for -make to decide which route to go wrt to frameworks on windows. Cheers, David ___ Gnustep-dev

Re: Frameworks on windows.

2005-06-28 Thread Nicola Pero
> Let me share a few ideas here before I send in a patch so I can judge the > likelyhood of it being accepted. > > Assumptions: > *) Frameworks depend heavily on symbolic links. (in gnustep-make) > *) Windows (Mingw environment) has no symbolic links > *) The Foo.framework/Versions/A/... is prob

Re: Frameworks on windows.

2005-06-28 Thread Riccardo
Hello, On Tuesday, June 28, 2005, at 12:04 PM, David Ayers wrote: Alex Perez wrote: David Ayers wrote: Frameworks (or true frameworks as some people call them) currently only work on Darwin (and for Matt Rice ;-) ). Matt has a set of patches that actually add framework support to glibc, b

Re: Frameworks on windows.

2005-06-28 Thread Sheldon Gill
OTOH, similar to the workarounds we have in -make for frameworks on non-Darwin systems, we could probably make it work in conjunction with Free versions of junction command line tools. But understand this is not the relocatable framework which compiler/linker/loader handle via -F/-framework. And

Re: Frameworks on windows.

2005-06-28 Thread David Ayers
Riccardo wrote: > Hello, > > On Tuesday, June 28, 2005, at 12:04 PM, David Ayers wrote: > >> Alex Perez wrote: >> >>> David Ayers wrote: >>> >> I don't mean to discourage anyone from trying, but I get the feeling >> that even if a community as large as the entire Darwin/Mac OS X >> community inc

Problem with Frameworks on Windows

2005-03-26 Thread Gregory John Casamento
make[2]: *** [GormPrefs.dll] Error 127 make[1]: *** [GormPrefs.all.framework.variables] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/d/Development/gnustep/dev-apps/Gorm/GormPrefs' make: *** [internal-all] Error 2 I'm getting the build error above when trying to use frameworks on Windows.

Frameworks that use Frameworks on Windows

2006-02-03 Thread Björn Giesler
Hi, I'm trying to build Adresses on Windows, which consists of two frameworks (Adresses.framework and AddressView.framework), the latter depending on the former. Everything seems to build fine, and Addresses.framework links as well. Linking AddressView.framework, however, gives me the fol

Re: Frameworks that use Frameworks on Windows

2006-02-05 Thread Adam Fedor
On 2006-02-02 13:00:37 -0700 Björn Giesler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > When it tries to link to Addresses.framework, it outputs > > ...undefined reference to __objc_class_name_ADAdressbook > > and so on. Is there something special that the GNUstep libraries do to > define their symbols so t