Re: GNUstep moving forward

2006-01-31 Thread Quentin Mathé
Le 29 janv. 06 à 13:18, Guilhem BONNEFILLE a écrit : On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 11:08:02 +0200 Sašo Kiselkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Currently I'm working 100% on http://student.fiit.stuba.sk/~kiselkov04/ProjectManager - an new IDE completely from scratch. The site is no more accessible. Perhaps

Re: GNUstep moving forward

2006-01-29 Thread Guilhem BONNEFILLE
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 11:08:02 +0200 Sašo Kiselkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Currently I'm working 100% on http://student.fiit.stuba.sk/~kiselkov04/ProjectManager - an new IDE completely from scratch. The site is no more accessible. Perhaps could you try to open a project page on a open platform

Re: GNUstep moving forward

2005-10-29 Thread Sašo Kiselkov
Quoting Serg Stoyan [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Monday 24 October 2005 21:40, Sašo Kiselkov wrote: Quoting Adrian Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I strongly encourage you to think about working on Project Center. Much of the grunt work that you'll have to redo is already done, it has a nice

Re: GNUstep moving forward

2005-10-24 Thread Sašo Kiselkov
Quoting Gregory John Casamento [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Although we have Gorm and ProjectCenter, I believe we do need more to make GNUstep attractive to devs. Some debugging (think MallocDebug) tools and other things might be nice in this regard. Also, a fully working ProjectCenter would be good

Re: GNUstep moving forward

2005-10-24 Thread Riccardo
Hello, On Saturday, October 22, 2005, at 12:46 PM, Gregory John Casamento wrote: GNUstep has been relatively stagnant over the last several months and it has become a cause for concern for me. for me too, it has become sometimes a cause of frustration. Since I have put it as only graphical

Project Manager/Center (Was: Re: GNUstep moving forward)

2005-10-24 Thread Stefan Urbanek
Citát Sašo Kiselkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Quoting Gregory John Casamento [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Although we have Gorm and ProjectCenter, I believe we do need more to make GNUstep attractive to devs. Some debugging (think MallocDebug) tools and other things might be nice in this regard.

Re: GNUstep moving forward

2005-10-24 Thread Adrian Robert
On Oct 24, 2005, at 5:08 AM, Sašo Kiselkov wrote: Quoting Gregory John Casamento [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Although we have Gorm and ProjectCenter, I believe we do need more to make GNUstep attractive to devs. Some debugging (think MallocDebug) tools and other things might be nice in this

Re: GNUstep moving forward

2005-10-24 Thread T.J. Yang
snip, very good analyiss Suggested next steps: snip - define project roles (and use person redundancy) and last, but not least: - observe and copy behaviour of successful players (*) Stefan I like to comment on your final next steps on mainly on Cbjective-C language. IMO, from a

Re: GNUstep moving forward

2005-10-24 Thread Sašo Kiselkov
Quoting Adrian Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Oct 24, 2005, at 5:08 AM, Sa#65533;o Kiselkov wrote: Quoting Gregory John Casamento [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Although we have Gorm and ProjectCenter, I believe we do need more to make GNUstep attractive to devs. Some debugging (think

Re: GNUstep moving forward

2005-10-24 Thread Gregory John Casamento
Riccardo, --- Riccardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, On Saturday, October 22, 2005, at 12:46 PM, Gregory John Casamento wrote: GNUstep has been relatively stagnant over the last several months and it has become a cause for concern for me. for me too, it has become sometimes a

Re: GNUstep moving forward

2005-10-23 Thread Sheldon Gill
Gregory John Casamento wrote: GNUstep has been relatively stagnant over the last several months and it has become a cause for concern for me. I am observing the same thing and realised few reasons (ordered how they comeunder my fingers on keyboard): External issues: 1. GNUstep

Re: GNUstep moving forward

2005-10-22 Thread Sašo Kiselkov
I've been with GNUstep over several years now and I agree that it is currently encountering a state of slow stagnation. Quoting Gregory John Casamento [EMAIL PROTECTED]: GNUstep has been relatively stagnant over the last several months and it has become a cause for concern for me. I've been

Re: GNUstep moving forward

2005-10-22 Thread Fred Kiefer
Gregory John Casamento wrote: GNUstep has been relatively stagnant over the last several months and it has become a cause for concern for me. Here I have to agree with you. GNUstep is for some time now actually usable, but progress and contributions have slowed down a lot. I can only talk

Re: GNUstep moving forward

2005-10-22 Thread Gregory John Casamento
Fred, --- Fred Kiefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gregory John Casamento wrote: GNUstep has been relatively stagnant over the last several months and it has become a cause for concern for me. Here I have to agree with you. GNUstep is for some time now actually usable, but progress and

Re: GNUstep moving forward

2005-10-22 Thread Nicolas Roard
On 10/22/05, Gregory John Casamento [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: GNUstep has been relatively stagnant over the last several months and it hasbecome a cause for concern for me. yes, many people seems to be quite busy irl lately :-/ I've been doing a lot of thinking and have compiled a list of things I

Re: GNUstep moving forward

2005-10-22 Thread Gregory John Casamento
Nicolas, --- Nicolas Roard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/22/05, Gregory John Casamento [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: GNUstep has been relatively stagnant over the last several months and it has become a cause for concern for me. yes, many people seems to be quite busy irl lately :-/ Yes,

Re: GNUstep moving forward

2005-10-22 Thread Adam Fedor
On Oct 22, 2005, at 5:53 AM, Sašo Kiselkov wrote: Yes, and I'd like to add to this: we need to simplify the way people report bugs. Remember the BugNeXT application? (http://www.levenez.com/NeXTSTEP/Demos.html) It's was a simple and fast way how to bug the developers at NeXT about their.