Hi,
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 20:13:39 +0200
David Ayers ay...@fsfe.org wrote:
| @Manuel/@David:
| Are you still actively using GSWeb and how much do you rely on WO45
| compatibility... i.e. if I fork/branch as I described would you be
| interested in the WO45 compatibility branch or the branch that
On 10 Apr 2010, at 16:36, Manuel Guesdon wrote:
About GSObjCRuntime, my main questions are
- what will be broken
Richard can answer this better than I can, (this time it wasn't my fault!) but
in general, only things that are duplicated functionality are being removed.
GSObjCRuntime had two
Hello folks,
I seems that the runtime abstraction layer is being deprecated. I would
have expected that the introduction of yet another runtime would
actually strengthen the need for the abstraction layer. Yet I
appreciate that supporting three runtimes is quite a task.
Also the semantics of
On 9 Apr 2010, at 19:13, David Ayers wrote:
I seems that the runtime abstraction layer is being deprecated.
Is it?
I would
have expected that the introduction of yet another runtime would
actually strengthen the need for the abstraction layer. Yet I
appreciate that supporting three
On 9 Apr 2010, at 21:12, David Chisnall wrote:
On 9 Apr 2010, at 19:13, David Ayers wrote:
I seems that the runtime abstraction layer is being deprecated.
Is it?
Some parts of it ...
I would
have expected that the introduction of yet another runtime would
actually strengthen the
