-Original Message-
From: Andrew Ruder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
automatically. For example, I can make a /modules/dev-apps that
basically says:
Check out /apps/gorm/trunk into the gorm directory
Check out /apps/easydiff/trunk into the easydiff directory
and so on. When you
Hey,
On Friday, October 21, 2005, at 10:50 PM, Adam Fedor wrote:
Plus we can't say, 'just update from CVS' to everyone who has a problem
anymore. Most people won't have svn, even if they knew how to do that
stuff. We need to update things like the daily snapshots.
I wonder if we could still
Am 23.10.2005 um 05:20 schrieb Adam Fedor:
/libs/base/{trunk,tags,branches}
/libs/gui/{trunk,tags,branches}
/libs/Renaissance/{trunk,tags,branches}
/apps/Gorm/{trunk,tags,branches}
/apps/gworkspace/{trunk,tags,branches}
and so on.
We could then have something like:
/modules/dev-apps
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 06:50:31AM -0700, Gregory John Casamento wrote:
/libs/base/{trunk,tags,branches}
/libs/gui/{trunk,tags,branches}
/libs/Renaissance/{trunk,tags,branches}
/apps/Gorm/{trunk,tags,branches}
/apps/gworkspace/{trunk,tags,branches}
and so on.
We could
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 01:25:20PM +0200, Markus Hitter wrote:
Subversion doesn't enforce any directory layout at all. Tags,
branches and copies are all cheap and are all the same: a bunch of
references in a new directory to what you have copied/tagged/
branched. To me, it's unclear why
Andrew Ruder schrieb:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 06:50:31AM -0700, Gregory John Casamento wrote:
/libs/base/{trunk,tags,branches}
/libs/gui/{trunk,tags,branches}
/libs/Renaissance/{trunk,tags,branches}
/apps/Gorm/{trunk,tags,branches}
/apps/gworkspace/{trunk,tags,branches}
and so on.
We could
On Sun, Oct 23, 2005 at 10:17:08PM +0200, David Ayers wrote:
libs/frameworks - tendency: no
tools/apps/servers - tendency: maybe
dev/user - tendency: maybe not)
nah, I think we will run into issues if we try to subdivide too much and
make it only harder to do a checkout. Organizational
On 23. Okt 2005, at 13:25 Uhr, Markus Hitter wrote:
Unlike CVS, Subversion numbers versions throughout the whole
repository. A bunch of files checked out have always the same
version; files get higher version numbers even without being
changed. As a result, one should tend to make small
Le 21 oct. 05 à 22:50, Adam Fedor a écrit :
On 2005-10-18 18:36:23 -0600 Andrew Ruder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Gna.org's hosting service has been nixed more or less by most. I
don't think that this is worth pursuing because of the overall
negative response.
I've think I've forgotten
Adam,
--- Adam Fedor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2005-10-18 18:36:23 -0600 Andrew Ruder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Gna.org's hosting service has been nixed more or less by most. I
don't think that this is worth pursuing because of the overall
negative response.
I've think
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 02:50:39PM -0600, Adam Fedor wrote:
On 2005-10-18 18:36:23 -0600 Andrew Ruder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Gna.org's hosting service has been nixed more or less by most. I
don't think that this is worth pursuing because of the overall
negative response.
I've
On Oct 22, 2005, at 7:56 PM, Andrew Ruder wrote:
Perhaps we can have the savannah folks disable it?
No, they will not do that. We could just as easily decide to make our
project non-free and then tell everyone to delete their free copies of
the project. I don't think that would go over
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 08:56:50PM -0500, Andrew Ruder wrote:
Is there anything in particular keeping you at savannah? The way I see
it, if savannah is unable to keep up with changing times and there is
another FSF ran service that can, there's really no reason to feel like
we must stay with
Gregory John Casamento wrote:
Adam,
--- Adam Fedor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2005-10-18 18:36:23 -0600 Andrew Ruder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Gna.org's hosting service has been nixed more or less by most. I
don't think that this is worth pursuing because of the overall
negative
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 09:20:53PM -0600, Adam Fedor wrote:
No, they will not do that. We could just as easily decide to make our
project non-free and then tell everyone to delete their free copies of
the project. I don't think that would go over well :-)
Ah, well, I think most of the
Alex,
--- Alex Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is what permanent HTTP redirects are for. Please, if we were to go
the route of moving, don't request that a nasty page with a please
click on the link below or a meta-redirect be set up when there is a
proper solution (HTTP redirect,
On 2005-10-18 18:36:23 -0600 Andrew Ruder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Gna.org's hosting service has been nixed more or less by most. I
don't think that this is worth pursuing because of the overall
negative response.
I've think I've forgotten - why was gna.org nixed? The reason I ask is
17 matches
Mail list logo
