All,
--- Adam Fedor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jul 21, 2005, at 4:31 PM, Fred Kiefer wrote:
> > Are you making a release of GUI and back as well? In the last few days
> > I
> > did get the basic cairo backend working again on the changed cairo
> > code.
> > If the back release isn't due
Adam Fedor wrote:
> I'm mostly satisfied with the libraries now, which is to say, I don't
> really have any time to make any significant changes. So I'll plan on
> freezing the release this Wednesday. Unless there are any objections.
>
Are you making a release of GUI and back as well? In the last
On Jul 21, 2005, at 4:31 PM, Fred Kiefer wrote:
Are you making a release of GUI and back as well? In the last few days
I
did get the basic cairo backend working again on the changed cairo
code.
If the back release isn't due in the next few days I'll add that code
to
CVS, if it's going out soo
> > This makes upgrades a bit cumbersome as you have to upgrade everything,
> > but well that's why we're making a major release I suppose. ;-)
> >
>
> Well, I can revert the make part of the patch. It shouldn't be a
> problem to have lobjc linked multiple times.
My personal suggestion would be
On Jul 20, 2005, at 6:14 AM, Nicola Pero wrote:
I believe the problem is that if you switch to the new -make package,
you
have to recompile everything from scratch (which I didn't, I reverted
to
the old gnustep-make as you did). :-(
My understanding is that before the change, we linked a too
Adam,
--- Adam Fedor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm mostly satisfied with the libraries now, which is to say, I don't
> really have any time to make any significant changes. So I'll plan on
> freezing the release this Wednesday. Unless there are any objections.
>
There is a memory leak in N
> > I'm mostly satisfied with the libraries now, which is to say, I don't
> > really
> > have any time to make any significant changes. So I'll plan on freezing the
> > release this Wednesday. Unless there are any objections.
>
> Well ...I have nothing very concrete but ... I'm dubious about t
On 2005-07-18 15:25:36 +0100 Adam Fedor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm mostly satisfied with the libraries now, which is to say, I don't
really
have any time to make any significant changes. So I'll plan on freezing the
release this Wednesday. Unless there are any objections.
Well ...I have
Nicola Pero wrote:
I'm mostly satisfied with the libraries now, which is to say, I don't
really have any time to make any significant changes. So I'll plan on
freezing the release this Wednesday. Unless there are any objections.
The Windows pseudo-framework support needs more polishing ... h
> I'm mostly satisfied with the libraries now, which is to say, I don't
> really have any time to make any significant changes. So I'll plan on
> freezing the release this Wednesday. Unless there are any objections.
The Windows pseudo-framework support needs more polishing ... hopefully I
can
Adam Fedor wrote:
> I'm mostly satisfied with the libraries now, which is to say, I don't
> really have any time to make any significant changes. So I'll plan on
> freezing the release this Wednesday. Unless there are any objections.
>
Fine for me. I am still investigating on how best to implement
On Jul 18, 2005, at 9:59 AM, Nicola Pero wrote:
I'm mostly satisfied with the libraries now, which is to say, I don't
really have any time to make any significant changes. So I'll plan on
freezing the release this Wednesday. Unless there are any objections.
The Windows pseudo-framework supp
12 matches
Mail list logo
