IMO that's the wrong thing to do though ... it's a case of throwing the
baby out with the bathwater ... rather than disabling all the
functionality until the problem goes away, you should be fixing the
problem. While some apps may not need cut and paste, drag and drop, to
provide services, to
On 2005-10-25 14:31:56 +0100 Adrian Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Oct 25, 2005, at 4:37 AM, Leigh Smith wrote:
...
So my question is the degree to which gdomap and gdnc are indeed
necessary
for an application not requiring explicit use of inter- process comms and
if NSMessagePortN
On Oct 25, 2005, at 4:37 AM, Leigh Smith wrote:
...
So my question is the degree to which gdomap and gdnc are indeed
necessary for an application not requiring explicit use of inter-
process comms and if NSMessagePortNameServer would address this
(since I see NSMessagePorts are explictly
On 2005-10-25 09:37:19 +0100 Leigh Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In an application that indeed relies on distributed processes, this would
be
the price to pay, but after some review of the GNUstep base code, it seems
the use of distributed notifications and distributed objects are tightl
I've been trying to use GNUstep & MinGW to produce a working Win32
application. One of the goals is to have the application behave as a
first class Windows application, in particular to launch it from the
Start menu without requiring MSYS and openapp to be running. Our
target group of users
