Aren't you effectively writing code when you create the XML by hand?
Good question.
The Renaissance XML format was designed to be a pleasure to edit by hand;
I personally like to edit the Renaissance XML files in emacs and find it
very productive - very simple, short, logical, to the point,
29, 2008 6:28:52 PM
Subject: Re: bindings and Renaissance
Selon Gregory John Casamento [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
One thing that springs immediately to mind is the connector classes for
Binding. They have to be finished. Are you going to be using these in
Renaissance? Do you currently use
In bindings.gsmarkup i define 2 textFields. First i bind the 1st
field to the
2nd one :
[first bind:value toObject:second ...]
If i change the value of the 1st field, the 2nd one is updated.
But I expected
that the value of the 1st would be updated when the value of the
2nd one
Selon Fred Kiefer fredkiefer at gmx.de:
1) Examples/bindings.gsmarkup, two textFields, one value.
I had to create two bindings between the two fields. I thought a bindings
was two-way
(...)
In bindings.gsmarkup i define 2 textFields. First i bind the 1st field to
the 2nd one :
Selon Nicola Pero [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In bindings.gsmarkup i define 2 textFields. First i bind the 1st
field to the
2nd one :
[first bind:value toObject:second ...]
If i change the value of the 1st field, the 2nd one is updated.
But I expected
that the value of the 1st would be
Selon Fred Kiefer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
1) Examples/bindings.gsmarkup, two textFields, one value.
I had to create two bindings between the two fields. I thought a bindings
was two-way
(...)
You do understand that the binding behaviour is not symmetrical?
May be i don't...
I get the
Selon Fred Kiefer fredkiefer at gmx.de:
1) Examples/bindings.gsmarkup, two textFields, one value.
I had to create two bindings between the two fields. I thought a bindings
was two-way
(...)
In bindings.gsmarkup i define 2 textFields. First i bind the 1st field to
the 2nd one :
Selon Nicola Pero [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In bindings.gsmarkup i define 2 textFields. First i bind the 1st
field to the
2nd one :
[first bind:value toObject:second ...]
If i change the value of the 1st field, the 2nd one is updated.
But I expected
that the value of the 1st would be
ups. sorry for the multiple double posts (!)
i thought some of them were lost :-/
___
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
# GNUstep Chief Maintainer
- Original Message
From: Xavier Glattard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Nicola Pero [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Xavier Glattard [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fred Kiefer [EMAIL PROTECTED];
gnustep-dev@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 9:08:24 AM
Subject: Re: bindings and Renaissance
looking to Core Data that is a tool to build model without code.
So : yes i would like to use Bindings in Renaissance.
I would like to get a full RAD environment with GNUstep that allows to build an
application without... you know what. Only XML.
And if i really need some code i might use steptalk
PROTECTED]; Nicola Pero [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fred
Kiefer [EMAIL PROTECTED]; gnustep-dev@gnu.org
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 6:28:52 PM
Subject: Re: bindings and Renaissance
Selon Gregory John Casamento [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
One thing that springs immediately to mind is the connector classes
Xavier Glattard wrote:
I'm playing with Renaissance : i just add a 'bind' tag and some examples.
bind source=#source label=binding target=#target key=key.path/
is (or should be) equivalent to :
[#source bind: @binding toObject:#target withKeyPath:@key.path
options:nil]
But the
Selon Nicola Pero [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
3) the 'sendActionOn' attribute seems broken, the textField only
'act' when i
press the Enter key. Is it a Renaissance issue ?
I'm not sure when textFields are expected to send their actions.
On Apple Mac OS X they seem to send their action when you
Fred Kiefer fredkiefer at gmx.de writes:
Xavier Glattard wrote:
(...)
1) Examples/bindings.gsmarkup, two textFields, one value.
I had to create two bindings between the two fields. I thought a bindings
was two-way
Could you please explain a bit more what you are expecting and what
Hello
I'm playing with Renaissance : i just add a 'bind' tag and some examples.
bind source=#source label=binding target=#target key=key.path/
is (or should be) equivalent to :
[#source bind: @binding toObject:#target withKeyPath:@key.path options:nil]
But the examples do not work as
Hello
I'm playing with Renaissance : i just add a 'bind' tag and some
examples.
bind source=#source label=binding target=#target
key=key.path/
is (or should be) equivalent to :
[#source bind: @binding toObject:#target withKeyPath:@key.path
options:nil]
Thanks - it's a nice
17 matches
Mail list logo
