Alright, let's stop arguing (which doesn't lead anywhere) and starting holes in
the air, but let's instead start some heavy-weight brain-storming for ideas on
how to implement the problems at hand. From the dicussions before we already
know that:
- GNUstep needs somewhat tighter management of
On 2005-10-26 08:49:52 +0100 Dennis Leeuw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it is a clear goal. Something we can all agree on, I don't think
there isn't anybody who doesn't want GNUstep to become 1.0. We just need a
list of things to be done and a timeframe.
Personally I see three, largely
Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
On 2005-10-26 08:49:52 +0100 Dennis Leeuw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sašo Kiselkov wrote:
Alright, let's stop arguing (which doesn't lead anywhere) and
starting holes in the air, but let's instead start some
heavy-weight brain-storming for ideas on how to
Hi Gregory,
To get to 1.0 I think a roadmap is needed. Looking at:
http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?group_id=99
Maybe someone should define which one of those tasks needs to be
completed before GNUstep can be 1.0. And those points should be made
more visible on the website, as to get peoples
Riccardo,
--- Riccardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
They want themeability and they want the freedom to endlessly customize
thier
desktop. This is something that people have been able to do on Windows
for
years.
well.. this is also a risk of making things complex. Once I was a
On Oct 25, 2005, at 7:28 AM, Dennis Leeuw wrote:
To get to 1.0 I think a roadmap is needed. Looking at:
http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?group_id=99
Maybe someone should define which one of those tasks needs to be
completed before GNUstep can be 1.0. And those points should be
made more
Dennis Leeuw wrote:
Hi Gregory,
To get to 1.0 I think a roadmap is needed. Looking at:
http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?group_id=99
Maybe someone should define which one of those tasks needs to be
completed before GNUstep can be 1.0. And those points should be made
more visible on the website,
Yes, and frankly this is a perfect opportunity to state that rule by
unanimous or even near-unanimous consent is simply not a viable nor
sustainable. People disagree. One cannot make everyone happy, nor should
they try to in all instances. Currently, I feel the GNUstep project is
trying
Hello,
I will put my thoughts down very bluntly thus try to get the meaning and
don't stop too much on the form.
My question is essentially... why do we need a change in gnustep? The
pope recently said continuous change is evil. ANd I agree, it is one
of the things that in computing is
Riccardo,
--- Riccardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I will put my thoughts down very bluntly thus try to get the meaning and
don't stop too much on the form.
My question is essentially... why do we need a change in gnustep?
We need change in GNUstep to make it more palatable to a
10 matches
Mail list logo
