On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Thomas J. Walker wrote:
>sh>Thomas, maybe it's just me, but I still can't determine from the
>sh>above: Does or does not ESA allow author self-archiving (of their own
>sh>final, accepted draft), without having to pay ESA anything extra? If it
>sh>does, then this is a true, be
This is a published rebuttal to:
Bloom (1999) Editorial in Science and
Relman (1999) Editorial in New England Journal of Medicine
Harnad, S. (2000) E-Knowledge
Computer Law & Security Report 16(2) 78-87.
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Papers/Harnad/harnad00.scinejm.htm
Two key objections to IEGs at the time were:
1. Their exclusive nature. They were available only to a small group of
laboratories.
2. The extremely cumbersome method of distribution and inconvenient format of
the material. (They were one-sided photocopies of typescript.)
The current self-archiving
At 02:58 PM 3/13/00 +, you wrote:
>On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Thomas J. Walker wrote:
>
>> > >sh> The market can then decide whether authors think this is worth the
>> > >sh> price -- as long as they are allowed the self-archiving option,
hence
>> > >sh> the choice...
>>
>> ESA requires authors to si
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Thomas J. Walker wrote:
> > >sh> The market can then decide whether authors think this is worth the
> > >sh> price -- as long as they are allowed the self-archiving option, hence
> > >sh> the choice...
>
> ESA requires authors to sign a copyright release that has
> no provisio
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Christopher D. Green wrote:
> First, contrary to Stevan, I suspect that much of the third word will
> indeed be left behind by the increasing computerization of the first
> world. Although this may "drive demand" for electronics in the third
> world (note, however, I suspect t
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Alan Story wrote:
> 1. It may well be that "securing paper copies for teachers
> and students is not the focus of this Forum." Fine. But if
> those who have initiated this list and support the
> self-archiving proposal ( and I think, as well, that it has
> a number of merits..
Tom,
I believe there are a few scientific societies that already offere free
online access on HighWire Press at Stanford. It looks like they are Journal
of Clinical Investigation, BMJ (British Medical Journal), Clinical Medicine
NetPrints, and Advances in Physiology Education. They all offer a fre
On Sun, 12 Mar 2000, Andrew Kenneth Fletcher wrote:
> I have a real problem with the current Peer Review System. It is biased
> towards in-house publications and outsiders are ignored.
>
> I had an idea to set up a new newsgroup titled "Peer Review Sci" I am
> certain that it would attract many pr
On Sun, 12 Mar 2000, Thomas J. Walker wrote:
>sh> The market can then decide whether authors think this is worth the
>sh> price -- as long as they are allowed the self-archiving option, hence
>sh> the choice...
>
tjw> Free Web access as offered by ESA includes the right to self archive
tjw> and
This is a response to Stevan's message (below) as well as
posts from Christopher Green (of York U.) and Marvin
Margoshes. I concentrates primarily on some access and
political and economic issues.
1. It may well be that "securing paper copies for teachers
and students is not the focus of this Foru
Stevan Harnad wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Alan Story wrote:
>
> > 3. In this regard, C. Green statement that "soon we'll
> > simply expect students" to have "hand-held devices that
> > access the web remotely e.g. from the classroom" is
> > interesting. I ask: who will pay for them? individuals?
12 matches
Mail list logo
