The ALPSP may call their deal a model licence...but instead it should be
called a Model-T (as in circa 1930 Model-T Ford ) licence.
Yes, the author gets the possibility of retaining copyright, but the
publisher is assigned (at no cost to the publisher it should be underlined)
ALL of the other
Alan,For the benefit of authors who may have little knowledge
of different rights but have probably heard of copyright, can you explain
briefly what copyright is and why retaining it may be of little use to the
author, as you suggest, in this example? Most authors will probably assume
Steve:
I am sorry;I am too pressed at this time...and in any event I do not need
more any lectures from Stevan. ( see post below).
The teaching issues/problems (in the UK) are explained in detail at:
http://www.ukcle.ac.uk/copyright/
Alan Story
Stevan:
Sally Morris' note
At 11:38 AM 6/22/2001 +0100, Stevan wrote:
The American Physical Society version of this same basic arrangement is
at ftp://aps.org/pub/jrnls/copy_trnsfr.asc :
The author(s) shall have the following rights: The author(s)
agree that all copies of the Article made under any of these
on Fri, 22 Jun 2001 Alan Story a.c.st...@ukc.ac.uk wrote:
The ALPSP may call their deal a model licence...but instead it should be
called a Model-T (as in circa 1930 Model-T Ford ) licence.
Yes, the author gets the possibility of retaining copyright, but the
publisher is assigned (at no
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Thomas J. Walker wrote:
sh [I might add only that the distinction between personal web home page
sh and e-print servers is silly, incoherent, and hence untenable, but it
sh makes no difference, if it makes some people happy to put it that way...]
There is distinction
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, [Anonymous] wrote:
I do not quite agree with you on the assertion that eprint services and
personal web pages are the same; the former have the distinction of being
maintained by some organisation which intends / commits to perpetuity and
may add additional useful
As soon as someone suggests you know it really is a crazy system under
which commercial publishers acquire, at no cost, all intellectual property
rights to the work of authors which is produced by the often-unpaid labour
of academics (because they love their subject area) and by the money of
Standards are great and often make the difference between the success and
failure of an endeavor. But in some cases other standards can be used and not
put
additional burdens on authors and users. It's possible to set up an open archive
that's useful and not require authors any additional work
Perhaps it would be worth having a look at the ALPSP licence before
dismissing it so readily - broad re-use rights, including educational use
and electronic posting, are retained by the author (I actually think this is
much more important than whose name appears on the copyright line)
Sally
(Forwarded from Info-Policy-Notes List)
Original Message
List-Post: goal@eprints.org
List-Post: goal@eprints.org
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 02:22:22 -0700
From: James Love l...@cptech.org
As the Hague Conference Diplomatic
Conference ends
the Internet and
11 matches
Mail list logo
