I am not a friend of Stevan's discussion style but I find this
discussion boring. Can we please return to our topic? In Australia is
already
OPEN ACCESS DAY
Please consider what you can do "today" (Tuesday) to spread the word
about OPEN ACCESS. In my weblog at
http://archiv.twoday.net
there wil
All -
actually I find Stevan's style invigorating and stimulating. I may
get annoyed (which stimulates thought)Â but Stevan has an impeccable
style of scholarly discusssion which could - with benefit - be
emulated by others. I do not see any conflict of interest or role -
Stevan appears to me t
I agree with Derek. From the 'votes' that have been reported it is clear that a
large majority support Stevan's role in moderating this list. There should be
an end date from the process and this should be within a few days.
I think that Sally should set such a deadline so that the list can move
Am I the only one who finds this febrile discussion
increasingly wearing and irritating?
If we must have this vote can we please do the normal thing and have
A closing date (ideally about 48 hours ahead for my money) and get back
to
What actually matters?
Derek Law
___
[ The following text is in the "WINDOWS-1252" character set. ]
[ Your display is set for the "iso-8859-1" character set. ]
[ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]
I don't know what 'voting' means here. It's entirely up to Stevan what to do
and what not to do anyway. If he wi
A timely and very clear reminder
As promised, I am collecting votes (offline, to avoid cluttering up the
list) on whether Stevan should remain as moderator of the list. Please note
that we are NOT voting on (a) whether Stevan should change his posting style
(he has already said that he will not d
Hello Sally,
Just a note to say that although I'm no longer with American
Scientist, this Forum is my creation--I invited Stevan to launch it--
and I can see to a moderator change (by making the necessary contact
with the system administrator) if need be.
Oh yes, and as a member of the list, I vo
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, s.jag...@roehampton.ac.uk wrote:
> What is an IR? What is an REF? What is an 'elevator pitch'? As a new
> Subject Head for my department, I find this type of email frustrating. If
> you are going to cross post, it would be nice if you provided a glossary
> for those of us unin
[ The following text is in the "utf-8" character set. ]
[ Your display is set for the "iso-8859-1" character set. ]
[ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]
I was on the road in the last few days, cut off from the Internet.
This will explain my silence.
I agree with all the
[ The following text is in the "WINDOWS-1252" character set. ]
[ Your display is set for the "iso-8859-1" character set. ]
[ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]
Apologies for the lateness of my comments on this matter. Stevan has my full
support. He is fully entitled to po
10 matches
Mail list logo
