102 people, just over 10% of the list membership, voted (I cannot be
more precise as I notice that some people appear to be signed up
under more than one email address). This is, obviously, a
self-selected sample but whether that could be expected to introduce
bias (other than to exclude those
Puzzled by Les's posting - Google Scholar already identifies 'green' sources
of documents, doesn't it?
Sally
Sally Morris
Consultant, Morris Associates (Publishing Consultancy)
South House, The Street
Clapham, Worthing, West Sussex BN13 3UU, UK
Tel: +44(0)1903 871286
Fax: +44(0)8701 202806
HKU Research Committee Agrees to Endorse a Paper on the Open Acccess
Advantage
The University Research Committee of the University of Hong Kong at
their September meeting discussed a paper describing the benefits of
placing research results in open access, freely available to
everyone.
Both Stephen Downes [ http://www.downes.ca/cgi-bin/page.cgi?post=45607
] and Stuart Lewis [
http://blog.stuartlewis.com/2008/08/13/google-bring-scholar-richness-into-normal-search-results/
] posted on this back in August.
Regards,
Garret
2008/10/16 Leslie Carr l...@ecs.soton.ac.uk:
This may be
I am sure this was covered some months ago. Google Scholar results appearing
in 'vanilla' Google (presumably this is about the same thing?). For example
Peter Suber on 14 August 2008 who is quoting Stuart Lewis's blog
http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2008/08/google-scholar-results-starting-
On 17 Oct 2008, at 09:27, Sally Morris (Morris Associates) wrote:
Puzzled by Les's posting - Google Scholar already identifies 'green'
sources
of documents, doesn't it?
What I mean is that
(a) Google Scholar is a service that few people are using (just look
at the stats for repository usage)
