2008/12/3 Stevan Harnad amscifo...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Klaus Graf klausg...@googlemail.com wrote:
2008/12/2 Stevan Harnad amscifo...@gmail.com:
As I have shown according German law it is not possible for all
researchers
to data-crunch digital documents.
Until you
On 2 Dec 2008, at 15:47, Michael Eisen wrote:
OF COURSE Elsevier can have objections to
libraries assisting individuals in self-archiving their
work, because
Elsevier does not want self archiving to succeed!
No-one wants to split unnecessary hairs, but there does seem
Les, the message below, from an Inserm colleague, is an answer to your
question, some weeks ago, about connection between HAL and PMC. It also
gives, at the end, an example of what isn't accepted, in terms of 'third-
parties assistance' for self-archiving, by Elsevier.
Herbert Gruttemeier
The
On 02 December 2008 18:31 Jean-Claude Guédon wrote:
Commercial presses will do all they can to keep self-archiving at
some artisanal, confusing level while lobbying like mad wherever they
can (this means governmental agencies such as NIH and other similar
agencies). The artisanal dimension I
At 15:47 02/12/2008, Michael Eisen wrote:
Les Carr wrote:
HAVING SAID THAT, the library is in no way adverse to finding
mechanisms that assist individuals and ease their tasks, and I guess
that Elsevier can have no objections to that either! How about a
notification email to be sent
[ The following text is in the utf-8 character set. ]
[ Your display is set for the iso-8859-1 character set. ]
[ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]
Le mercredi 03 décembre 2008 à 05:54 +, Leslie Carr a écrit :
Discussion on the other side of the fence (the
