The overlay journal notion is and always has been an inchoate,
incoherent idea. Physicists thought that since they were happy just
using the Arxiv version of preprints and postprints, the journals
could be phased out, and the peer-review could be overlaid on
Arxiv.
But the journals are sustained
An international workshop in Amsterdam in March, funded by JISC, SURF and
DRIVER, discussed work needed to improve interoperability between
repositories. Four areas of work were focused upon:
- citation services
- interoperable identification systems
- repository handshaking (interoperable deposit
On 26/06/2009 05:31, Stevan Harnad wrote:
Nor is this mere semiology; for thinking in terms of overlay
journals rather than just peer-reviewed online-only journals with
distributed archiving and access-provision, we miss the fact that the
only real substantive components are the fact that
On 25/06/2009 11:42, Sally Morris sa...@morris-assocs.demon.co.uk wrote:
Isn't it the case that it's only in the case of articles published Open
Access, and where the fee is paid by Wellcome, that there is any requirement
on the publisher to do the depositing?
Yes, though I understand that
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Matthew Cockerill
m...@biomedcentral.com wrote:
Stevan,
You suggest that the announcement text:
The Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) now requires
authors to publish research results into open access journals and
also encourages dual submission
-- Forwarded message --
From: Leslie Carr lac -- ecs.soton.ac.uk
List-Post: goal@eprints.org
List-Post: goal@eprints.org
Date: Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 7:36 AM
Subject: Re: News from ORBi, the institutional repository of the
University of Liege
To: JISC-REPOSITORIES -- jiscmail.ac.uk
Begin forwarded message:
From: Myriam Bastin Myriam.Bastin -- ulg.ac.be
Date: June 26, 2009 4:13:36 AM EDT (CA)
To: har...@ecs.soton.ac.uk, Leslie Carr lac -- ecs.soton.ac.uk, Tim
Brody tdb2 -- ecs.soton.ac.uk
Subject: News from ORBi, the institutional repository of the University of
Liege
Hang on, deposit is not an `arbitrary hoop' that the publisher can
jump through as and when they are bothered. It is a condition of the
contract between the Wellcome and the publisher. If a publisher
accepts Wellcome's money to make a paper Gold OA then one of the
conditions of the contract
[ The following text is in the windows-1252 character set. ]
[ Your display is set for the iso-8859-1 character set. ]
[ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 12:20 PM, David
Prosserdavid.pros...@bodley.ox.ac.uk wrote:
Hang on, deposit is not an
`and I repeat: it is an arbitrary and counterproductive hoop that the
publisher is being paid to jump through, for no good reason
whatsoever, and to no genuine advantage, just disadvantage'
And I repeat that if you have taken money to jump through an
arbitrary hoop then you can, and should,
[ The following text is in the windows-1252 character set. ]
[ Your display is set for the iso-8859-1 character set. ]
[ Some characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:21 PM, David Prosser
david.pros...@bodley.ox.ac.uk wrote:
SH: it is an
11 matches
Mail list logo
