On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Michael Eisen mbei...@gmail.com wrote:
M.E.:
But if you're going to use the standard of email inboxes being filled
with
nonstop entreaties to pursue a path to open access, surely it is green
OA
that would suffer the most :-).
S.H.:
Mike, do you
El 30/10/2011 17:03, Stevan Harnad escribió:
Not only is it regrettable that OA is so unthinkingly identified in
most people's minds exclusively with gold OA publishing, but this
growing spate of relentless fool's-gold junk-OA spamming is now
coalescing with that misconception -- and at the
Stevan says, 'Who cares if journals are unaffordable if we have access
anyway? ' and that is the key to the debate. Ask researchers what aspect of
OA is most important to their work and they always say, access to the latest
developments in their area of research. Ask researchers in the developing
Reme brings up an excellent, if unstated, point ... commercially published OA
journals like commercially published subscription journals are the problem ...
not the society/non-commercial OA and subscription journals.
Â
Dana L. Roth
Millikan Library / Caltech 1-32
1200 E. California Blvd.
