El 30/10/2011 17:03, Stevan Harnad escribió:
Not only is it regrettable that OA is so unthinkingly identified in most people's minds exclusively with gold OA publishing, but this growing spate of relentless fool's-gold junk-OA spamming is now coalescing with that misconception -- and at the same time more and more universities and funders are reaching into their scarce funds to pay for this kind of thing, thinking this is the way to provide OA. I am also an OA supporter, but I do not agree 100% with this afirmation, because the situation depends also on different areas of the world, for instance in Latinamerican and Caribbean countries (LAC) , gold OA exists for years (even if their journals were not called OA journals, in fact most of them are "gratis journals") but the repositories landscape is an emerging area, in fact there are very few institutional repositories. However, projects like Scielo, Redalyc or Latindex that have been working for years with journals editors successfully. So, there are diverse OA landscapes, and depends on where you are the route to achieve OA could be different, said that I have also to say that I do not agree with paying 3000 dollars or euros to publish a paper, but in mostly LAC journals, authors do not pay any fee to publish a paper. Good morning form the Mediterranean side. Reme -- Reme Melero CientÃfico Titular CSIC IATA Avda Agustin Escardino 7, 46980 Paterna, Valencia Tel 963900022 ext 3121 www.accesoabierto.net
