GOAL at eprints.org
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/goal
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/pipermail/goal/attachments/20120104/c01dce69/attachment-0001.html
Thank you Andrew. Exactly true, but that simply says that the task is harder;
it does not make it undesirable. I simply am not interested in counting articles
except as this helps in establishing the question I asked. Counting articles has
been done many times by people with more money than I
Lee,
Disambiguating author names is indeed a difficult problem. It may have been
mentioned on this list before, but are you familiar with ORCID? (Open Researcher
Contributor ID â http://orcid.org). The number and nature of the
participants
make for a good chance of success for this initiative.
Possibly of some tangential relevance, and just out but no green OA version
yet, AFAIK:
Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement
Xuemei Li, Mike Thelwall, and Dean Giustini
Scientometrics, (21 Dec 2011)
http://www.springerlink.com/content/35146th23t1j1284/
Abstract:
On 3 Jan 2012, at 18:49, Stevan Harnad wrote:
That's UNMANDATED repositories, of course.
MANDATED repositories are far more successful than either Mendeley or
unmandated repositories:
http://openaccess.eprints.org/uploads/greenmand60.png
I've just realised that I made THREE posts, and
Reminder -- Call for proposals: SPARC Open Access Meeting Innovation Fair
Washington, DC â Proposals are now being invited for the SPARC 2012 Open
Access Meeting Innovation Fair, where new technologies and strategies will be
showcased in engaging, informative, rapid-fire presentations. The
