is probably unrealistic.
What we are seeing is progress on many disconnected fronts. That is probably
the best we can hope for. The notion of somehow globally optimizing governance
is particularly problematic.
David Wojick
Inside Public Access
On Jun 26, 2020, at 3:54 PM, Glenn Hampson wrote:
I’ll
distant topic, profit is a public good if it provides a public
service. Food, for example.
David Wojick
Inside Public Access
On Jun 26, 2020, at 1:55 PM, Kathleen Shearer
wrote:
Glenn, all,
I don’t think there really is a large variation in current definitions of open;
but there are some
A lot of industry research is directly related to products and services so the
results are proprietary. As an example, after I discovered the issue tree I was
getting sole source federal contracts to do them, because only I knew how. So I
never published anything on them.
Google does more R
I dislike metaphors in reasoning but in the travel case the publishers are more
like the official who approves your visa to enter their country, for a fee. The
idea that one can restructure an industry without consulting the leading
producers strikes me as unlikely to work. It is a coup and
her.
> We’ve been skipping a necessary step in this process for far too long.
>
> Best,
>
> Glenn
>
>
> Glenn Hampson
> Executive Director
> Science Communication Institute (SCI)
> Program Director
> Open Scholarship Initiative (OSI)
>
>
>
of Illinois, 1408 West Gregory Drive, Urbana,
> Illinois 61801
> ljani...@illinois.edu, 217-333-1323 (v), 217-244-4358 (f)
>
>
>
> From: David Wojick
> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2020 2:41 PM
> To: Hinchliffe, Lisa W
> Cc: Glenn Hampson ; Thatcher, Sanford Gray
&
ruction
> University Library, University of Illinois, 1408 West Gregory Drive, Urbana,
> Illinois 61801
> ljani...@illinois.edu, 217-333-1323 (v), 217-244-4358 (f)
>
>
>
> From: scholcomm-requ...@lists.ala.org on
> behalf of David Wojick
> Sent: Monday, April
Sci) ; Glenn Hampson
>
> Subject: Re: [SCHOLCOMM] Fostering Bibliodiversity in Scholarly
> Communications: A Call for Action
>
> I suspect there are lots of limits to common ground. In fact the hypothesis
> that there is significant common ground strikes me as untested, much l
I suspect there are lots of limits to common ground. In fact the hypothesis
that there is significant common ground strikes me as untested, much less
proven, especially if one includes the more radical positions.
David Wojick
> On Apr 20, 2020, at 1:54 PM, Thatcher, Sanford Gray wrote:
>
The point is that the dominant role of copyright in scholarly publishing is to
benefit the publisher, to the detriment of OA, not the author. In fact it is
argued that OA benefits the author.
This is why Wallinsky's simple OA proposal is to reduce the copyright term to
the minimum needed to
s anything
to do with academic freedom.
So I would say that things like contract requirements have nothing to do
with academic freedom, unless they specify what cannot be said. Copyright
does not do this.
David
David Wojick
http://insidepublicaccess.com/
At 03:26 PM 3/24/2018, SANFORD G THATCHER
is to
shorten the term of the copyright granted to the author. This copyright
transfers to any publisher that requires it as a condition of publication.
David
Dr. David Wojick
http://insidepublicaccess.com/
On Mar 24, 2018, at 4:07 AM, Danny Kingsley <da...@cam.ac.uk> wrote:
&g
are
claimed by some to be in the billions of dollars. That some professors
might make a few thousand dollars less does not stack up well against that.
David Wojick
At 12:54 PM 3/23/2018, SANFORD G THATCHER wrote:
>It's highly unlikely that Frankfurt or the other author I mentioned received
>any f
omain, Frankfurt would have been a much less wealthy man and PUP
>denied
>the opportunity to publish a best seller. Do you really want to make this kind
>of serendipity impossible to achieve?
>
>
>
>
>On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 11:03 AM David Wojick <dwoj...@craigellachie.us&g
less
glacial tempo, sometimes... OA could have used a dose of the global
warming in which DW does not believe...)
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 12:08 PM, David Wojick
<<mailto:dwoj...@craigellachie.us>dwoj...@craigellachie.us> wrote:
John Willinsky has a fascinating OA proposal, namely tha
ica Great
> Again"...)
>
> (And now, back to a world where things actually move forward at a less
> glacial tempo, sometimes... OA could have used a dose of the global warming
> in which DW does not believe...)
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 12:08 PM, David Wojick <d
16 matches
Mail list logo
