[GOAL] Re: Monographs

2013-12-02 Thread l . hurtado
OK. Let's see where we've got to in the recent flurry over Gold option and monographs/books: --The UK is only one country, and things may be different elsewhere. No debate. I only referred to consequences in the UK. E.g., Canada (I'm a Canadian citizen living in the UK) may have

[GOAL] Re: Monographs

2013-11-30 Thread l . hurtado
In response to Dr. Morrison: If you're getting by with author-pay charges per journal article of $1000 (Canadian, I presume), count yourself lucky. The two articles I've had accepted this year, in journals published by OUP and by Brill, each would have cost me £2000-2500 (UK Pounds).

[GOAL] Re: Monographs

2013-11-30 Thread l . hurtado
Contra Prosser, it IS strictly true in the UK that the *Gold* option involves author-pays. The RCUK allows the Green approach *for the present time*, but with intonations that they'd really like everything to go Gold. I've read the consultation document. Larry Hurtado Quoting David

[GOAL] Re: Harnad Comments on Proposed HEFCE/REF Green Open Access Mandate

2013-03-14 Thread l . hurtado
Thanks to Steven Harnad for giving us his enthusiastic view on the HEFCE prooposd policy for REF and OA. Among my concerns that he doesn't address, however, is one that will be shared by many/all in the Humanities (almost always the Cinderella at the OA ball): What about books? Though

[GOAL] Re: Hat Tip: Let's not leave Humanities behind in the dash for open access

2012-07-25 Thread l . hurtado
Webster concisely articulates the concerns that I briefly mooted a few days ago. Larry Hurtado Quoting Omega Alpha Open Access oa.openacc...@gmail.com on Wed, 25 Jul 2012 11:03:30 -0400: Hat Tip: Let’s not leave Humanities behind in the dash for open access http://wp.me/p20y83-no Nice

[GOAL] Re: Finding a business model for a growing Open AccessJournal

2012-07-20 Thread l . hurtado
I'm President of my UK learned society, and have had no contact about the Finch project or anything connected with scholarly publishing. So, I'm not confident that the scholarly community has been involved adequately in the Finch process (though I stand to be corrected). From what little