Dana Roth writes
it is totally unrealistic to assume serious researchers have the
time to wade thru anything more than a fraction of what is being
published.
Sure.
Is there really anything better than limiting current awareness to
high quality peer reviewed journals,
Of course there
-
From: goal-boun...@eprints.org [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] On Behalf Of
Dana Roth
Sent: donderdag 25 september 2014 5:55
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Subject: [GOAL] Re: Interesting Current Science opinion paper on Predatory
Journals
I agree with Chuck ... and feel
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Subject: [GOAL] Re: Interesting Current Science opinion paper on Predatory
Journals
Quote: Predatory publishing has damaged the very foundations of scholarly and
academic publishing,
No it hasn’t. It’s a minor annoyance, at most.
David
On 23
] on behalf of David
Prosser [david.pros...@rluk.ac.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 1:30 AM
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Subject: [GOAL] Re: Interesting Current Science opinion paper on Predatory
Journals
Quote: Predatory publishing has damaged the very foundations
...@rluk.ac.ukmailto:david.pros...@rluk.ac.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 1:30 AM
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Subject: [GOAL] Re: Interesting Current Science opinion paper on Predatory
Journals
Quote: Predatory publishing has damaged the very foundations of scholarly and
academic
Prosser
Date:09/24/2014 4:38 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Subject: [GOAL] Re: Interesting Current Science opinion paper on Predatory
Journals
Of course, sharp practices such as passing yourself off for another company,
including the names of Nobel Price winners
Wireless 4G LTE smartphone
Original message
From: David Prosser
Date:09/24/2014 4:38 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Subject: [GOAL] Re: Interesting Current Science opinion paper on Predatory
Journals
Of course, sharp practices such as passing
Quote: Predatory publishing has damaged the very foundations of scholarly and
academic publishing,
No it hasn’t. It’s a minor annoyance, at most.
David
On 23 Sep 2014, at 07:47, anup kumar das
anupdas2...@gmail.commailto:anupdas2...@gmail.com wrote:
Predatory Journals and Indian
