Thanks for drawing my attention to this interesting paper, Marc. I think it
clearly shows that universities have often held back from claiming rights
over academic writings based on pragmatic reflections - (universities tend
to be averse to litigation, especially against their own faculty
: charlesoppenheim c.oppenh...@btinternet.com
Sent: Friday, 7 February 2014, 21:42
Subject: Re: [GOAL] A reply to Professor Carroll
I'm afraid there's an option (d), which is that I did read Professor
Oppenheim's post, and I think it misstates the legal situation in both the
United States and the United
(Successor of AmSci)
Cc: charlesoppenheim
Subject: [GOAL] Re: A reply to Professor Carroll
I'm afraid there's an option (d), which is that I did read Professor
Oppenheim's post, and I think it misstates the legal situation in both the
United States and the United Kingdom when an author assigns
: charlesoppenheim c.oppenh...@btinternet.com
Sent: Friday, 7 February 2014, 21:42
Subject: Re: [GOAL] A reply to Professor Carroll
I'm afraid there's an option (d), which is that I did read Professor
Oppenheim's post, and I think it misstates the legal situation in both the
United States
] A reply to Professor Carroll
I'm afraid there's an option (d), which is that I did read Professor
Oppenheim's post, and I think it misstates the legal situation in both the
United States and the United Kingdom when an author assigns the exclusive
rights under copyright in the final version
I'm afraid there's an option (d), which is that I did read Professor
Oppenheim's post, and I think it misstates the legal situation in both the
United States and the United Kingdom when an author assigns the exclusive
rights under copyright in the final version of an article. Specifically,
the
