On 18 December 2013 12:07, Andrew A. Adams wrote:
>
> Graham,
>
> There is still disagreement as to the exact scope of CC-NC license. For
> example, a University which uses material in a MOOC for which it does not
> charge any fees isclearly NC. However, what about if they offer
> certification
>
On 2013-12-18, at 3:42 AM, Graham Triggs
mailto:grahamtri...@gmail.com>> wrote:
To re-iterate a previous discussion, an exclusive publishing license exists
between the author and the publisher, and can not limit anyone downstream with
what they can do according to the terms of the licence they
Graham,
There is still disagreement as to the exact scope of CC-NC license. For
example, a University which uses material in a MOOC for which it does not
charge any fees isclearly NC. However, what about if they offer certification
of completion for a fee (as some do). Does the profit/not-for-
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Graham Triggs wrote:
> On 18 December 2013 06:41, Peter Murray-Rust
> I agree with you about the other problems about funders and OA subset.
> However, let's just step back a minute and think about the bigger picture.
>
> An -NC licence does not prevent any scholar
On 18 December 2013 06:41, Peter Murray-Rust wrote:
> Not necessarily. It means that for any commercial use (and the CC
>> definition is subject to interpration), one has to obtain the permission of
>> the copyright owner, which may be the author, depending of the scope of the
>> license granted
On 17 December 2013 22:38, Couture Marc wrote:
> I’m in the editorial board of an OA journal which uses -NC but doesn’t
> ask authors to grant it a license, so the authors keep the exploitation
> rights.
>
>
>
> The problem with Elsevier is that they require (even for CC-BY) an
> exclusive licen
money is not confined to Elsevier. It is true of other TA
publishers, especially those who promote CC-NC.
>
>
> Marc Couture
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *De :* goal-boun...@eprints.org [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] *De la
> part de* Peter Murray-Rust
&g
urray-Rust
Envoyé : 17 décembre 2013 16:04
À : Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Objet : [GOAL] Re: Hybrid Open Access
I flagged this up to Elsevier about 5 months ago.
I would agree that they could be in violation of trading laws as they are
asserting rights over free material and charging
cess List (Successor of AmSci)
Subject: [GOAL] Re: Hybrid Open Access
Can you clarify regarding instances of CCC RightsLink demanding payments for OA
reuse? I'd really like to know details.
--
Laura Markstein Quilter / lquil...@lquilter.net<mailto:lquil...@
e information is in the ScienceDirect metadata I’m not
>> sure why RightsLink can’t “read “ this and for whatever use the user
>> selects, the fee is calculated to be £0.00. Better still would be for
>> CC-BY articles NOT to contain a link to Right
t;
>
>
> Regards
>
> Robert
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* goal-boun...@eprints.org [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Laura Quilter
> *Sent:* 17 December 2013 14:53
> *To:* Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
> *Subject:* [G
m: goal-boun...@eprints.org [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] On Behalf Of
Laura Quilter
Sent: 17 December 2013 14:53
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Subject: [GOAL] Re: Hybrid Open Access
Can you clarify regarding instances of CCC RightsLink demanding payments fo
I have written several articles round about this date. click forward or
back...
http://blogs.ch.cam.ac.uk/pmr/2013/07/31/elsevier-charge-for-re-use-of-author-paid-open-access-article-in-teaching/
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Laura Quilter wrote:
> Can you clarify regarding instances of CCC
Can you clarify regarding instances of CCC RightsLink demanding payments
for OA reuse? I'd really like to know details.
--
Laura Markstein Quilter / lquil...@lquilter.net
*Attorney, Geek, Militant Librarian, Teacher*
Copyright and Information Policy Librarian
Univ
14 matches
Mail list logo
