Possibly of some tangential relevance, and just out but no green OA version
yet, AFAIK:
Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement
Xuemei Li, Mike Thelwall, and Dean Giustini
Scientometrics, (21 Dec 2011)
http://www.springerlink.com/content/35146th23t1j1284/
Abstract:
On 3 Jan 2012, at 18:49, Stevan Harnad wrote:
That's UNMANDATED repositories, of course.
MANDATED repositories are far more successful than either Mendeley or
unmandated repositories:
http://openaccess.eprints.org/uploads/greenmand60.png
I've just realised that I made THREE posts, and
On 2012-01-03, at 1:01 PM, Les Carr wrote:
...Mendley is not any more successful in providing OA than repositories
That's UNMANDATED repositories, of course.
MANDATED repositories are far more successful than either Mendeley or
unmandated repositories:
