septembre 2013 00:42
À : 'Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)'
Objet : [GOAL] Re: Open access research: some basics for scientists
Heather
I agree with you and endorse your comments. However, there is a caveat: some
questions addressed in open access are indeed scientific, and not social
...@eprints.org [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] De la part de
Arthur Sale
Envoyé : mardi 17 septembre 2013 00:42
À : 'Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)'
Objet : [GOAL] Re: Open access research: some basics for scientists
Heather
I agree with you and endorse your comments
: Tuesday, 17 September 2013 6:50 PM
To: 'Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)'
Subject: [GOAL] Re: Open access research: some basics for scientists
Arthur,
I am amazed... Do you mean that social scientists are not scientists?
You might recall the etymology of the word statistics (e.g.
http
Heather
I agree with you and endorse your comments. However, there is a caveat: some
questions addressed in open access are indeed scientific, and not social
scientific. I think of measuring adoption rates, deposit delays,
bibliometrics, etc from analyses of public data on the Internet or
