Am 01.02.13 22:59, schrieb Peter Murray-Rust:
But publishers need to prevent innovation from people like me as it
threatens their "ownership of content".
...
And the product will be an order of magnitude more valuable than any
current closed scientific databases. The results will be fully
se
)
Subject: [GOAL] Re: RCUK policy: relationship between green and CC-BY-NC
Mark,
Am 01.02.13 11:07, schrieb Thorley, Mark R.:
The policy does not define a specific licence for green deposit, provided
non-commercial re-use such as text and data mining is supported.
if now Google (Scholar) set
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Hans Pfeiffenberger <
hans.pfeiffenber...@awi.de> wrote:
> Mark,
>
> Am 01.02.13 11:07, schrieb Thorley, Mark R.:
>
> The policy does not define a specific licence for green deposit, provided
> non-commercial re-use such as text and data mining is supported.
>
>
Mark,
Am 01.02.13 11:07, schrieb Thorley, Mark R.:
The policy does not define a specific licence for green deposit, provided
non-commercial re-use such as text and data mining is supported.
if now Google (Scholar) set out to go beyond indexing and offered
(free) access to text mining of the do
Mark and all,
Thanks all for the responses - yes, this certainly clarifies things as
far as I'm concerned. So under RCUK green policy, it is OK for
publishers to forbid commercial re-use, but not noncommercial.
Mark, your slide led to a slight misinterpretation within our uni, so
might I sugge
l-boun...@eprints.org] On Behalf Of
Pippa Smart
Sent: 31 January 2013 14:51
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Subject: [GOAL] Re: RCUK policy: relationship between green and CC-BY-NC
To me the policy doesn't contradict itself: it says:
Gold OA must allow commercial reuse
but
Gre
To me the policy doesn't contradict itself: it says:
Gold OA must allow commercial reuse
but
Green OA can be restricted to non-commercial reuse only ("without
restrictions on non-commercial re-use" - i.e. without restrictions, so
long as the reuse is non-commercial)
and - so far as I am aware - t
A quick reply.
I would be extremely surprised if it mandated CC BY-NC specifically.
My impression and intuition would be that it meant CC BY-NC was the most
restrictive licence allowed, but that CC0, CC BY and other more liberal
licences were also allowed. Restriction of commercial usage being th
