On 20/01/2012 03:15, Stevan Harnad wrote:
On 2012-01-19, at 11:02 AM, Sandy Thatcher wrote:
Can you give me any numbers for scientists within the U.S. who do not have
access to the professional literature they need through either their institution
al
affiliations or services like DeepDyve?
I
: Wednesday, 18 January 2012 2:50 PM
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Subject: [GOAL] Re: Research Works Act AAP Members
Sandy Thatcher wrote onLibLicense-L Discussion Forum:
a better approach... would be to require any government agency that
funds research to require... a final report
On 2012-01-18, at 8:24 PM, Sandy Thatcher wrote:
I was addressing the needs of the general public, not the
needs of researchers, many of whom are not U.S.
taxpayers and hence cannot rely on that argument.
The general public, I want to urge, does NOT need
professional journal articles.
: Wednesday, 18 January 2012 2:50 PM
To: Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci)
Subject: [GOAL] Re: Research Works Act AAP Members
Sandy Thatcher wrote onLibLicense-L Discussion Forum:
a better approach... would be to require any government agency that
funds research to require... a final report
On 2012-01-19, at 11:02 AM, Sandy Thatcher wrote:
Can you give me any numbers for scientists within the U.S. who do not have
access to the professional literature they need through either their
institutional
affiliations or services like DeepDyve?
I can give you the following pieces of
Sandy Thatcher wrote onLibLicense-L Discussion Forum:
a better approach... would be to require any government agency that
funds research to require... a final report...
to be posted immediately upon acceptance... openly accessible to all
The primary intended users of refereed research
