On 27 March 2014 07:37, Andrew A. Adams wrote:
> >
> https://blogs.ch.cam.ac.uk/pmr/2014/03/26/elseviergate-elsevier-is-still-charging-for-open-access-even-after-i-have-told-them-wellcome-should-take-them-to-court/
> > Elseviergate;
> > Elsevier is STILL charging for Open Access even after I
> >
Thank you for highlighting this.
I have suggested that libraries or Universities should identify all their
paid APCs and list them publicly. Assuming the payments went through
finance it should be possible to do this. Then we can challenge publishers
- Elsevier currently asserts it is in a better
> https://blogs.ch.cam.ac.uk/pmr/2014/03/26/elseviergate-elsevier-is-still-charging-for-open-access-even-after-i-have-told-them-wellcome-should-take-them-to-court/
> Elseviergate;
> Elsevier is STILL charging for Open Access even after I
> have told them. Wellcome should take them to court
> Someo
There is also an article in the Times Higher:
http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/news/elsevier-bumps-on-road-to-open-ac
cess/2012238.article
-Original Message-
From: goal-boun...@eprints.org [mailto:goal-boun...@eprints.org] On Behalf
Of Dana Roth
Sent: 26 March 2014 19:48
To: Global
