Re: New channel of support for open-access publishing

2004-01-16 Thread David Goodman
Subject: Re: New channel of support for open-access publishing Journals with 90% rejection rates, like Nature, Science and Cell have considerably higher editorial costs (per published paper) than those with rejection rates of 40%-60%, which is an average value for middle-of-the-road biomedical journals

Re: New channel of support for open-access publishing

2004-01-15 Thread Leslie Carr
On 15 Jan 2004, at 14:20, Gherman, Paul M wrote: There is another payoff to the practice of charging for all submissions, that authors will less likely to breakdown their articles into multiple smaller publications to add lines to their resume. When I first started lecturing, a professorial co

Re: New channel of support for open-access publishing

2004-01-15 Thread Gherman, Paul M
There is another payoff to the practice of charging for all submissions, that authors will less likely to breakdown their articles into multiple smaller publications to add lines to their resume. However, I would suggest a lower submission fee and a larger publication fee once the article has been

Re: New channel of support for open-access publishing

2004-01-15 Thread Fytton Rowland
far as I know no journal has tried this approach yet. Fytton Rowland, Loughboroughb University, UK. - Original Message - From: "Thomas Krichel" To: Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 8:45 PM Subject: Re: New channel of support for open-access publishing > Stevan Harnad

Re: New channel of support for open-access publishing

2004-01-14 Thread Alexander Grimwade
Journals with 90% rejection rates, like Nature, Science and Cell have considerably higher editorial costs (per published paper) than those with rejection rates of 40%-60%, which is an average value for middle-of-the-road biomedical journals. Nearly the same effort goes into peer reviewing a rejecte

Re: New channel of support for open-access publishing

2004-01-14 Thread Thomas Krichel
Stevan Harnad writes > On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Thomas Krichel wrote: > > > $1500 per paper should be amply sufficient to fund the > > publishing operation. I suggest that libraries support other > > ventures with more moderate charges. > > Thomas, did you mean $500 ? Otherwise your posting doe

Re: New channel of support for open-access publishing

2004-01-14 Thread Stevan Harnad
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Thomas Krichel wrote: > $1500 per paper should be amply sufficient to fund the > publishing operation. I suggest that libraries support other > ventures with more moderate charges. Thomas, did you mean $500 ? Otherwise your posting does not quite make sense. (PLoS is pr

New channel of support for open-access publishing

2004-01-14 Thread Peter Suber
For immediate release January 14, 2004 For more information, contact: Helen Doyle, Public Library of Science, +1 415.624.1217, hdo...@plos.org or see http://www.plos.org/support. NEW CHANNEL OF SUPPORT FOR OPEN-ACCESS PUBLISHING Public Library of Science Announces Launch of Institutional