access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org
Subject: Re: OA's Three Bogeymen
Alas, this whole discussion continues to assume that publishing must rest
mainly on organizations that behave like businesses (hence the call for
sustainability) and often are busineses. Why should they not be treated as
se
On 17-Feb-10, at 6:19 AM, Richard Poynder wrote:
However, I think Jean-Claude is more focussed on âoughtâ than âisâ.
True, he
proposes an existing service (Brazil's SciELO) as a model for the
future,
but given the way that researchers are motivated by their institutions
and
their fun
t they must be conceived coherently
> and correctly.
>
>
>
> Van: American Scientist Open Access Forum namens Richard Poynder
> Verzonden: di 16-2-2010 11:59
> Aan: american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org
> Onderwerp: OA
-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org
Subject: Re: OA's Three Bogeymen
Alas, this whole discussion continues to assume that publishing must rest
mainly on organizations that behave like businesses (hence the call for
sustainability) and often are busineses. Why should they not be treated a
coherently
and correctly.
Van: American Scientist Open Access Forum namens Richard Poynder
Verzonden: di 16-2-2010 11:59
Aan: american-scientist-open-access-fo...@listserver.sigmaxi.org
Onderwerp: OA's Three Bogeymen
I am inclined to agree with Keith. However, it needs to be acknowle
I am inclined to agree with Keith. However, it needs to be acknowledged that
researchers are not always very discerning when choosing a publisher. I have had
some say to me, âIn an ideal world I would not opt to pay to publish with this
or that particular publisher, but I need to get my work pub
