Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 3:52 PM
Subject: Re: The First and Foremost PostGutenberg Distinction
Thank you Jean-Claude
But when you speak of the green and gold road, and their form of publishing,
does it imply that the accessible works come with these rights granted
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 2:47 AM, Chris Zielinski wrote:
His name is Wallace-Wells, everyone, not Wallace-Evans! Nobody seems to be
reading the original...
No, the original is alas indeed being read, but the readers are so
appalled by the author's endless substantive misreadings and
Thank you Jean-Claude
But when you speak of the green and gold road, and their form of publishing,
does it imply that the accessible works come with these rights granted ...
or is it only seen as a way to get there.
I means that if those rights are given, does it matter much how the
work is
Is there a distinction between papers that are just openly accessible,
and papers that can be freely reproduced on other sites, or other
media in your classifications.
I am trying o identifi the concept of an open work. If it is simply
something that I can access, that qualifies the whole of the
Bernard,
I will simply quote the Bethesda statement on OA:
1. Definition of Open Access Publication
An Open Access Publication[1] is one that meets the following two conditions:
1. The author(s) and copyright holder(s) grant(s) to all users a free,
irrevocable, worldwide, perpetual right
Bernard,
The Green Road is not generally conceived of as publishing unless you take the
work publishing in a very general sense, such as making public. Stevan
Harnad, in fact, has always carefully separated the Green Road (self-archiving -
not self-publishing) from both vanity presses and
* Jean-Claude Guédon jean.claude.gue...@umontreal.ca, le 16-11-10, a écrit:
Bernard,
The Green Road is not generally conceived of as publishing unless you
take the work publishing in a very general sense, such as making
public. Stevan Harnad, in fact, has always carefully separated the
...@listserver.sigmaxi.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 3:52 PM
Subject: Re: The First and Foremost PostGutenberg Distinction
Thank you Jean-Claude
But when you speak of the green and gold road, and their form of publishing,
does it imply that the accessible works come with these rights granted
Re-posted for Charles Oppenheim whose posting arrived encrypted:
-- Forwarded message --
From: C Oppenheim C.Oppenheim -- lboro.ac.uk
List-Post: goal@eprints.org
List-Post: goal@eprints.org
Date: Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 2:47 AM
Subject: RE: Your posting came through encrypted
Hiya
One can sympathize with Larry Lessig's frustration in An Obvious Distinction:
LL:
In 2010, [for David Wallace-Evans] to suggest [in a
6000-word review in The Nation] that [the Creative
Commons movement] 'exhort[s]⦠piracy and the plundering
Indeed, Larry!
And Stevan Harnad is quite right is refusing to equate Open Access with the Gold
Road.
In fact, Open Access is made up of two approaches: OA publishing or Gold Road
and self-archiving or Green Road. And both roads are valuable, arguably
equally (although differently) valuable.
As
11 matches
Mail list logo
