1. Santosh wrote:
Most of the times, I try to question the truth of, and sometimes pass judgment
on, what a person writes, not the person himself.
Comment:
Santosh is partial to the truth. He never thought of questioning Francois
Gauntier’s article. He never thought of challenging Gurumurthy’
1.Santosh wrote;
Any reasonable person would note that it is pointless to respond to writers who
cannot defend themselves in this forum.
Comment:
Santosh contradicts himself as he commented on Ingrid Albuquerque's article
even though she was not able to respond on this forum. Refer:
http://www.g
--- On Mon, 10/27/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Finally, I must say that I am disappointed that Santosh lacks the
>>intellectual honesty and humility to accept where he is wrong but would
>>continue to flog and grind an issue until the other party gives up in
>>exhaustion.
The failed attempts at deception in Marshall’s latest propaganda piece against
me in this thread are:
1. He falsely implies that my short general comments on an Ingrid Albuquerque
article that I posted are somehow different from a general comment that I made
on a Gurumurthy article posted by so
