Thank you Gabe.
In conclusion: Any action the puts the other in fear - is termed as assault.
One does not need to touch the other personor need a doctor to testify
in court. The court decides whether the fear was justified or not.
Harasser is the one who harasses.
As far as your statement th
On 28 June 2011 11:33, J. Colaco < jc> wrote:
>
>
> Comment: Thank you Gabe for NOT answering the question put to you.
>
> I will try one more time - by simplifying it - and then sit s on
> this matter:
> (I add two questions which appears to be confusing o senhor Oxford)
>
> [A] The Gab
Gabe Menezes RESPONDED: MY reply was based on ground reality; this is how
it is over here. Just a couple of days ago Police were given this
directive:- Not an offence to abuse police: Officers told not to arrest
people who scream.*... obscenities because courts won't convict.
---
Comment: T
On 27 June 2011 15:21, J. Colaco < jc> wrote:
> [1] Gabe was asked the following (albeit hypothetical question): "Does
> Gabe believe that he and (say) 14 others CAN suddenly TURN UP at his
> parish priest's residence in the UK or during a meeting at the church,
> and demand to be heard or el
[1] Gabe was asked the following (albeit hypothetical question): "Does
Gabe believe that he and (say) 14 others CAN suddenly TURN UP at his
parish priest's residence in the UK or during a meeting at the church,
and demand to be heard or else?"
[2] the Dr. Falcao noted the following: "If there
