Ok, I see what you mean. Put the sh script somewhere and create an
/etc/atool.conf with:
path_rpm2cpio /path/rpm2cpio.sh
Actually, you could put rpm2.cpio.sh in atools R/Wrappers and all
would be self contained in atool.
On 9/9/06, Fábio Mierlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Follow a sh version f
Follow a sh version from the current maintainer of rpm (4.4.6)
http://wraptastic.org/pub/twang/rpm2cpio.sh
But atool will call this function as the command?
On 9/9/06, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess it could be embedded in Compile somewhere (Functions/Compile).
> something li
I guess it could be embedded in Compile somewhere (Functions/Compile).
something like:
function rpm2cpio() {
perl -e '
'
}
On 9/9/06, Fábio Mierlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Very good, but where this script should be placed?
>
> On 9/9/06, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 9
> How is that going? Does it take too much "ifdef"fing in the scripts?
Oh, wait... Were you referring to the Cygwin portability project as a
whole?
I've discovered and fixed a couple of script bugs as a result of this
project, but I'm trying to keep my changes in the
CreateRootlessEnvironme
On 9/9/06, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Seems reasonable but I've been removed from development for some time.
>
> Nice to see you back in the mailing list, btw!
>
Thanks. Anything you want me to work on?
>
> Getting GoboLinux PPC done is low on my priorities right now :( (i
> On 9/9/06, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 9/9/06, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> As I work to try to improve rootless's portability (I'm now
>>> trying to
>>> go for both Cygwin and OS X) I'd like to alter Get_Architecture. For
>>> non-Linux kernels, I'd like to append the k
>>> As I work to try to improve rootless's portability (I'm now
>>> trying to
>>> go for both Cygwin and OS X) I'd like to alter Get_Architecture. For
>>> non-Linux kernels, I'd like to append the kernel type to the result.
>>> I'd also like to account for OS X's incorrect uname -m output.
>
> Ho
Very good, but where this script should be placed?
On 9/9/06, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/9/06, Fábio Mierlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm patching Compile to extract tar.gz from src.rpm, but having RPM
> > as dependence isn't a good thing. I'm making a recipe for RPM 4.4.6
On 9/9/06, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/9/06, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 9/9/06, Fábio Mierlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > the Xorg 7.1 meta-recipe was update adding the Xorg-utils, but
> > > GV and Xaw3d depends of Xorg-util.
> > >
> > >
On 9/9/06, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/9/06, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As I work to try to improve rootless's portability (I'm now trying to
> > go for both Cygwin and OS X) I'd like to alter Get_Architecture. For
> > non-Linux kernels, I'd like to append the kernel type
On 9/9/06, Fábio Mierlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm patching Compile to extract tar.gz from src.rpm, but having RPM
> as dependence isn't a good thing. I'm making a recipe for RPM 4.4.6,
> but it will be a very huge package 17M to compile a 200k package
> like hwdata.
>
Busybox has a rpm2cpio
On 9/9/06, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/9/06, Fábio Mierlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > the Xorg 7.1 meta-recipe was update adding the Xorg-utils, but
> > GV and Xaw3d depends of Xorg-util.
> >
> > Will be recompiled a new Xorg 7.1 package and the Xorg-utils
> > d
On 9/9/06, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I work to try to improve rootless's portability (I'm now trying to
> go for both Cygwin and OS X) I'd like to alter Get_Architecture. For
> non-Linux kernels, I'd like to append the kernel type to the result.
> I'd also like to account for OS X's incor
On 9/9/06, Fábio Mierlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the Xorg 7.1 meta-recipe was update adding the Xorg-utils, but
> GV and Xaw3d depends of Xorg-util.
>
> Will be recompiled a new Xorg 7.1 package and the Xorg-utils
> dependencies remove from GV and Xaw3d?
Yes, I just fixed the dependenc
On 9/9/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 02:38:51 +0200, Fábio Mierlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to make a recipe for the Firebird database, it really sucks.
> >
> > There's 22K of patch until now, most of then is due hardcode "root"
>
As I work to try to improve rootless's portability (I'm now trying to
go for both Cygwin and OS X) I'd like to alter Get_Architecture. For
non-Linux kernels, I'd like to append the kernel type to the result.
I'd also like to account for OS X's incorrect uname -m output.
All the output for Go
Hi,
the Xorg 7.1 meta-recipe was update adding the Xorg-utils, but
GV and Xaw3d depends of Xorg-util.
Will be recompiled a new Xorg 7.1 package and the Xorg-utils
dependencies remove from GV and Xaw3d?
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@li
On 9/9/06, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/9/06, Fábio Mierlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm patching Compile to extract tar.gz from src.rpm, but having RPM
> as dependence isn't a good thing. I'm making a recipe for RPM 4.4.6,
> but it will be a very huge package 17M to com
On 9/9/06, Fábio Mierlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm patching Compile to extract tar.gz from src.rpm, but having RPM
> as dependence isn't a good thing. I'm making a recipe for RPM 4.4.6,
> but it will be a very huge package 17M to compile a 200k package
> like hwdata.
What about Jonas' link t
On 9/9/06, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually not. I've removed from the wiki page because we are probably
> not going to add it at 013, due to space restrictions. We may
> reconsider it, however.
>
> Here is the recipe I've done, which still has a issue:
> "Compiles ok, but somethi
Actually not. I've removed from the wiki page because we are probably
not going to add it at 013, due to space restrictions. We may
reconsider it, however.
Here is the recipe I've done, which still has a issue:
"Compiles ok, but something gets wrong during make install. After
files are installed,
Does anyone successful compile Lyx under ChrootCompile?
It isn't in the 013 recipe problems
http://gobo.kundor.org/wiki/013_recipe_problems
and isn't in the recipe store
http://gobolinux.org/recipe-store/?M=D
___
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux
On 9/9/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 17:15:25 +0200, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > On 9/9/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>Added installation of unmanaged files to SymlinkProgram
> >
> > Installation of unmanaged files
> On 9/9/06, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Shouldn't we have two variables, like $goboPrefix _and_
>> $goboCrossPrefix?
>> Its look like to me we are at this moment using a same variable for
>> two different purposes, and they conflict sometimes (like in the
>> report made by Dan).
On 9/9/06, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shouldn't we have two variables, like $goboPrefix _and_ $goboCrossPrefix?
> Its look like to me we are at this moment using a same variable for
> two different purposes, and they conflict sometimes (like in the
> report made by Dan).
Actually we
On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 17:34:51 +0200, Jonas Karlsson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 17:15:25 +0200, Hisham Muhammad
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On 9/9/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Added installation of unmanaged files to SymlinkProgram
>>
>> Insta
>>> Added installation of unmanaged files to SymlinkProgram
>>
>> Installation of unmanaged files is/should not be made at
>> SymlinkProgram, but at InstallPackage and Compile. You don't want
>> unmanaged files to be re-copied every time you switch versions using
>> SymlinkProgram, for example.
On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 17:30:37 +0200, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 9/9/06, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 9/9/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >Added installation of unmanaged files to SymlinkProgram
>>
>> Installation of unmanaged files is/
On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 17:15:25 +0200, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 9/9/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Added installation of unmanaged files to SymlinkProgram
>
> Installation of unmanaged files is/should not be made at
> SymlinkProgram, but at InstallPacka
On 9/9/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For adding users and groups I usually use this in pre_build():
>
> if ! grep -q foo $goboSettings/group
> then
> Log_Normal "Adding group foo"
> groupadd foo
> fi
>
> if ! grep -q "foo:x:" $goboSettings/passwd
> then
> Log_Normal "A
Shouldn't we have two variables, like $goboPrefix _and_ $goboCrossPrefix?
Its look like to me we are at this moment using a same variable for
two different purposes, and they conflict sometimes (like in the
report made by Dan).
Having these two variables available, we could probably use something
l
On 9/9/06, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/9/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Added installation of unmanaged files to SymlinkProgram
>
> Installation of unmanaged files is/should not be made at
> SymlinkProgram, but at InstallPackage and Compile. You don't wa
On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 02:38:51 +0200, Fábio Mierlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to make a recipe for the Firebird database, it really sucks.
>
> There's 22K of patch until now, most of then is due hardcode "root"
> strings.
Can't you just do "find -type f | xargs -i sed -i s/root
On 9/9/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Added installation of unmanaged files to SymlinkProgram
Installation of unmanaged files is/should not be made at
SymlinkProgram, but at InstallPackage and Compile. You don't want
unmanaged files to be re-copied every time you switch vers
34 matches
Mail list logo
