Re: [gobolinux-devel] Continuing Quest for Spiritual Successor

2013-09-12 Thread Carlo Calica
The really nice thing about Gobo was how approachable the codebase was. It was pretty easy to add features (like the unionfs sandbox) due to the different layers. Each part was easy to understand. Creating a full distro is pretty ambitious. Especially a modern one where the lower level parts ar

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Is GoboLinux alive?

2013-08-26 Thread Carlo Calica
just living in $HOME. Maybe distro-agnostic but I wouldn't care if it was Gobo for day to day use. On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Wouter ten Böhmer wrote: > High hopes! > Op 26 aug. 2013 23:13 schreef "Hisham" het volgende: > > On 25 August 2013 03:34, Carlo Calica wrot

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Is GoboLinux alive?

2013-08-24 Thread Carlo Calica
I really miss using Gobo. Haven't found a distro nearly as easy to use. A revamped rootless would be wonderful. Unfortunately, I just don't have time. How is everyone? On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 11:09 AM, teique wrote: > I think Gobolinux should become GobolinuxPackageManager to work with all

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [gobolinux-users] New Distro?

2012-07-25 Thread Carlo Calica
Replacing all the different sh friendly data files with JSON would be nice. Would love to have a modern Gobo again. I really miss it. On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Fabio Mierlo wrote: > It's nice! > > Just for advice, as proof of concept of your idea you can start your project > creating rep

[gobolinux-devel] Thought you might find this interesting

2010-09-19 Thread Carlo Calica
http://mxcl.github.com/homebrew/ Its basically a Fink or MacPorts that is similar to Gobo. I hope everything is going well. I'm really busy with my newborn, Ethan. -- Carlo J. Calica ___ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.or

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Branch tools for 015

2009-06-10 Thread Carlo Calica
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 7:24 AM, André Detsch wrote: > On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Michael Homer wrote: >> If something isn't ready now, it should be cut. The release is already >> a year late. Deferring it for blue-sky features is silly when they >> could go into the start of the next release,

[gobolinux-devel] calica.com DNS issues

2009-02-02 Thread Carlo Calica
Hi, For the last few days calica.com was having DNS issues. They should be resolved now. Sorry for any problems. -- Carlo J. Calica ___ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobol

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Behavior of general use flags

2008-09-21 Thread Carlo Calica
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 2:35 AM, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A problem with this approach is that there's no way to reset a generic > flag to the default behaviour. If +bbb is set there is no way to reset > "aaa" to selecting from the full "bbb ccc ddd" group. Currently just > spe

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Versioning executables

2008-09-21 Thread Carlo Calica
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 12:35 AM, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It has been pointed out that zsh has very powerful tab completion and we could > probably reconfigure it to ignore those executables unless you actually > entered the - yourself, if it turned out to be a real problem. I

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Versioning executables

2008-09-21 Thread Carlo Calica
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 12:15 AM, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If versioned executables is only used by our tools that is an option, > but are they? Can't a user want to run a specific version of an > application? > Specify a full path? But at that point they could just access it

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Versioning executables

2008-09-21 Thread Carlo Calica
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 11:51 PM, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > My preference, for the record, is still to version all executables all the > time. I like consistency and reliability. > I don't mind /S/L/E getting cluttered up. I do mind tab completion being weird but could probably

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Versioning executables

2008-09-20 Thread Carlo Calica
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I agree that the cost for versioned binaries are much less then the > benefit that comes from it. > agreed. > What I do think may cause an issue is signing of programs/packages. As > versioned binaries should be a user

Re: [gobolinux-devel] gobo on Eee PC?

2008-08-29 Thread Carlo Calica
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:55 PM, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Carlo Calica wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> Carlo made an announcement of a LiveFlash edition created especially &g

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Boot sequence enhancement

2008-08-29 Thread Carlo Calica
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thomas Heller wrote: >>> I'd like a /S/S/BootTasks file with one task per line, with # comments.. >>> >> >> I kind of like the idea with that file too. >> I will certainly look into the init projects (upstart, initNG, e

Re: [gobolinux-devel] gobo on Eee PC?

2008-08-28 Thread Carlo Calica
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Carlo made an announcement of a LiveFlash edition created especially >> for his EEE pc, righ after the release of 014: >> >> http://lists.gobolinux.org/pipermail/gobolinux-devel/2008-January/003113.html >> >> He might

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Boot sequence enhancement

2008-08-28 Thread Carlo Calica
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > One thing I noticed about gobo Tasks is that some takes start/stop > arguments and some does not. Doing StopTask Network brings down the > interfaces, while StopTask HAL would try to start another copy of hald! > Yes

Re: [gobolinux-devel] KDE 4.0.4 packages in official == problems

2008-06-27 Thread Carlo Calica
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 12:21 AM, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 1:22 PM, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 7:57

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Software Installation

2008-06-27 Thread Carlo Calica
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 12:01 AM, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 27 June 2008 14:25:42 Matt Lawrence wrote: >> Hi. I would first of all like to congratulate all of you on not just >> being "yet another Linux distro". You guys have contributed so much >> more than the vast majo

Re: [gobolinux-devel] KDE 4.0.4 packages in official == problems

2008-06-27 Thread Carlo Calica
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 1:22 PM, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 7:57 PM, Lucas C. Villa Real > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 6:44 PM, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Yes I am. Previous

Re: [gobolinux-devel] KDE 4.0.4 packages in official == problems

2008-06-20 Thread Carlo Calica
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 4:25 AM, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I've been attempting to install KDE 4.0.4 on a fairly fresh install >> under VMWare Fusion on OS X. I init

[gobolinux-devel] KDE 4.0.4 packages in official == problems

2008-06-20 Thread Carlo Calica
I've been attempting to install KDE 4.0.4 on a fairly fresh install under VMWare Fusion on OS X. I initially had a problem with Scripts not doing recursive package deps resolving. Now it is pulling in way too much, including half of Gnome. Is there a way to view the deps tree? mhomer, can fresh

[gobolinux-devel] GoboLinux 015

2008-06-20 Thread Carlo Calica
This email is to kick off development of the 015 LiveCD. We've been waiting for GCC 4.3.1 to ship and that has happened now. I know that Jonas has built a toolchain and some packages. What else is needed to fill out ChrootCompile? Lucas, could you chime in? Once ChrootCompile is setup we can s

Re: [gobolinux-devel] GoboRootless usability comments

2008-06-10 Thread Carlo Calica
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 12:25 PM, mpb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 3) Whenever I upgrade Compile (via InstallPackage Compile) I am told > that there is a new Compile.conf file, and asked which version I want > to use. This is always a hassle, as I am never sure whether to use > the new one (which

Re: [gobolinux-devel] kundor.org

2008-05-27 Thread Carlo Calica
We can set this up with www.calica.com On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Nick Matteo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > As you might have noticed, kundor.org had some downtime last week. > The problem should be resolved for the forseeable future, but it's > become clear that backups would be a

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [RFC] SignProgram/VerifyProgram

2008-05-09 Thread Carlo Calica
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > An obvious fix is to simply ignore the errors if the offending file is > a symlink, as proposed in this patch. Is it ok to commit this, or do > you want to think in a more elaborated solution? (I'm ok with this > one

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Scripts and Compile pre-releases

2008-04-16 Thread Carlo Calica
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:46 PM, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That is fixed in SVN. I still can't reproduce it locally, but Jonas > committed a fix (which should be in those latest tarballs). > -Michael > > Update to newest tarballs and it is fixed. -- Carlo J. Calica ___

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Scripts and Compile pre-releases

2008-04-16 Thread Carlo Calica
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > http://karlsson.sytes.net/gobo/packages/Scripts--2.9.0--i686.tar.bz2 > > http://karlsson.sytes.net/gobo/packages/Compile--1.11.0--i686.tar.bz2 > > > Due to the amounts of small fixes I have commited recently (an

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Scripts and Compile pre-releases

2008-04-16 Thread Carlo Calica
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:55 PM, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > as Michael announced yesterday here comes the release. Or at least the > pre-release. This is what will be the release in a couple of days, > unless something unforseen happens, so please test it in every >

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Licensing

2008-04-16 Thread Carlo Calica
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:52 AM, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > To my knowledge, we have acks from me, Jonas, Lucas, Hisham, André, > and Carlo, which covers most of the code, but we still need them from > Dan, Guillherme, Rafael, MJ, and Aitor. Also from anybody who's > contribut

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Tools freeze

2008-04-15 Thread Carlo Calica
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 2:49 AM, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > There'll be a Scripts and Compile release soon (hours, perhaps; > otherwise tomorrow when Jonas gets time), so there's a code freeze on > it starting now. Check in bug or compatibility fixes only, and anybody >

[gobolinux-devel] [ANN] GoboLinux 014.01 released

2008-04-02 Thread Carlo Calica
We are very happy to introduce GoboLinux 014.01, the new release of GoboLinux, the Linux distribution with an alternative file system structure. This release is our first "point release", providing a stability update for our latest major release, GoboLinux 014, which was released three months ago.

Re: [gobolinux-devel] GoboLinux 014.01 final released

2008-03-31 Thread Carlo Calica
Due to a small error on the iso, I've rereleased it. the new md5sum is: c4c4827d8bbaf724e0e28f8ead47e7da On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi All! > > Just a quick note. I've renamed rc1 to final. Its available at: &g

[gobolinux-devel] GoboLinux 014.01 final released

2008-03-30 Thread Carlo Calica
Hi All! Just a quick note. I've renamed rc1 to final. Its available at: http://gobo.calica.com/gobolinux-iso/GoboLinux-014.01-i686.iso http://kundor.org/gobo/iso/GoboLinux-014.01-i686.iso md5sum: fb14d071258245b9804ab8a3444f94c9 I'll make a full announcement in a bit. Thanks for all the work

[gobolinux-devel] Announcing GoboLinux-014.01-rc1.iso

2008-03-30 Thread Carlo Calica
014.01-rc1 Announce I'm happy to announce GoboLinux 014.01-rc1. I hope to have no changes between this and the final 014.01. beta1 had 498 downloads from distinct IPs. That amount of testing and the lack of reports implies a great release. We'll be pressing 4000 CDs for the International Forum

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Weird Linux recipe behavior

2008-03-29 Thread Carlo Calica
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Anyways. its 8:30am, i'm passing out , I'm u/l the iso to > http://www.calica.com/gobolinux/iso/ mainly so you can see the font > issue. You need to install it, it doesn't show ju

[gobolinux-devel] Weird Linux recipe behavior

2008-03-29 Thread Carlo Calica
So I ChrootCompile Linux 2.6.24.4-r1. Something weird happened. In Unmanaged/S/K/Modules/2.6.24.4-Gobo there aren't any modules.* files. It also seems like depmod -a wasn't run. I compared previous ver/revs and I can't find anything to explain it. This is actually a good thing. I realized ther

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Announcing the 014.01-beta1 (its my birthday!!) LiveCD

2008-03-26 Thread Carlo Calica
On 3/26/08, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 014.01-beta1 Announce > > I'm proud to announce GoboLinux 014.01-beta1. This is shaping up to > be a pretty solid release. Please test this thoroughly. We'll be > pressing 4000 CDs for the International

[gobolinux-devel] Announcing the 014.01-beta1 (its my birthday!!) LiveCD

2008-03-26 Thread Carlo Calica
014.01-beta1 Announce I'm proud to announce GoboLinux 014.01-beta1. This is shaping up to be a pretty solid release. Please test this thoroughly. We'll be pressing 4000 CDs for the International Forum on Free Software and the deadline is Apr 1st. Its available at: http://gobo.calica.com/gobol

Re: [gobolinux-devel] 014.01-alpha1 released!!!!

2008-03-25 Thread Carlo Calica
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've just installed this version in a real machine here. Despite the > long wait for the removal of broken links, everything worked like > expected. > Great! I hope the lack of other bug reports indicates a lac

[gobolinux-devel] 014.01-alpha1 released!!!!

2008-03-21 Thread Carlo Calica
Hopefully I'm not jumping the gun but I'd like to get this out there for wider testing. http://www.calica.com/gobolinux/iso/GoboLinux-014.01-alpha1.iso MD5SUM: 9e4d78b82b8fba3371fdd0144c7dec6f SIZE: 700639232 (669 M) I'm uploading this now. Should take about 2 hours, check file size and MD5 If

Re: [gobolinux-devel] PostInstall x bit being set

2008-03-20 Thread Carlo Calica
On 3/20/08, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 4:48 AM, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We need PostInstall scripts to have their x bits set. SVN requires a > > special command to set

[gobolinux-devel] Close to 014.01-alpha release

2008-03-20 Thread Carlo Calica
I'm getting close to releasing the first alpha of 014.01. I'd like to do some more testing locally and get some clean ChrootCompile builds of Xorg, OpenOffice, DBus and OpenSSH vs the hand massage packages I'm using currently. What I need from you guys: KDE packages. Either 3.5.9 or a rebuilt K

[gobolinux-devel] PostInstall x bit being set

2008-03-20 Thread Carlo Calica
Hi, We need PostInstall scripts to have their x bits set. SVN requires a special command to set these, 'svn propset svn:executable true PostInstall' (thanks Jonas). It would be really nice if PutRecipe would handle is automatically. RecipeLint should also check for the shebang. Thanks. -- Ca

Re: [gobolinux-devel] 014.b grub enumeration.

2008-03-19 Thread Carlo Calica
On 3/19/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I'm booting with a CD/Flash mix. The CD contains isolinux, kernel, > > initrd, and NO squashfs images. The initrd won't find any squashfs > > images and will fallback to the usb flash. > > > > Any idea what's wrong? What can I t

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Name of GoboLinux 014 bugfix release

2008-03-19 Thread Carlo Calica
On 3/19/08, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Right. I'm ok with 014.1. Or maybe 014.01, then 014.10 and then > 014.11. No more than 3 bug fix releases would be allowed in this case > ;-) > I like this. -- Carlo J. Calica ___ gobolin

[gobolinux-devel] 014.b grub enumeration.

2008-03-19 Thread Carlo Calica
Hi, Just tried to install on real hardware. Sorta a pathological case and grub isn't installed correctly. This is with recent snapshots of Installer and ConfigTools. My hd setup: /dev/hda /dev/hdb /dev/sda (SATA SI 3114 chipset, PCI card) /dev/sdb (SATA SI 3114 chipset, PCI card) /dev/sdc (SATA

Re: [gobolinux-devel] IRC meeting this weekend - 014.b

2008-03-18 Thread Carlo Calica
On 3/18/08, Hisham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > As well, having had a chance to read the log: if there's a new release > > of Scripts for this, is it going to be cut from trunk or just have > > backported fixes in

Re: [gobolinux-devel] IRC meeting this weekend - 014.b

2008-03-17 Thread Carlo Calica
On 3/17/08, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/17/08, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/17/08, Hisham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > SVN migration. This requires changes in BuildLiveCD tools. >

Re: [gobolinux-devel] IRC meeting this weekend - 014.b

2008-03-17 Thread Carlo Calica
On 3/17/08, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/17/08, Hisham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > SVN migration. This requires changes in BuildLiveCD tools. Hopefully > > > these changes won't take too long to implement or cause othe

Re: [gobolinux-devel] IRC meeting this weekend - 014.b

2008-03-17 Thread Carlo Calica
On 3/17/08, Hisham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > 2.6.24.x kernel: This kernel opps while mounting squashfs > > filesystems. Obviously, this is a problem for the livecd. Last I > > talked with Lucas, he had a few patches to try but I don't know the > > current status. > > Still need

Re: [gobolinux-devel] IRC meeting this weekend - 014.b

2008-03-15 Thread Carlo Calica
On 3/14/08, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > Sorry for such short notice but the week has progressed faster than I > thought was possible. > I'd like to call for an IRC meeting this weekend to primarily to > discuss the progress of 014.b. This is even more pressing because

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Cross Distro collaboration list

2008-03-05 Thread Carlo Calica
On 3/5/08, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Came across this. Might be good if some of our recipe committers and > devs joined. > Links are good :-) Announcement: http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/blog/?p=281 Subscribe: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinf

[gobolinux-devel] Cross Distro collaboration list

2008-03-05 Thread Carlo Calica
Came across this. Might be good if some of our recipe committers and devs joined. -- Carlo J. Calica ___ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel

Re: [gobolinux-devel] BuildLiveCD

2008-02-14 Thread Carlo Calica
On 2/14/08, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/2/14, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Hi, > > > > BuildLiveCD was written completely independent of Scripts so that it > > could be executed anywhere. The problem is that we ended up with a lot > > of replicated code

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Calling all 014 bugs

2008-01-30 Thread Carlo Calica
On 1/29/08, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 06:06:41 +0100, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > In preparation for the 014.1 release*, I'd like to make sure all 014 > > bugs are recorded in the tracker, bugs.gobolin

[gobolinux-devel] Calling all 014 bugs

2008-01-27 Thread Carlo Calica
In preparation for the 014.1 release*, I'd like to make sure all 014 bugs are recorded in the tracker, bugs.gobolinux.org Please add them the the "GoboLinux 014" project. Thanks. * Please note. This release is strictly for bugfixes. Even then, fixes may not be included if they have a high risk

Re: [gobolinux-devel] New mailing list for tracking the bugtracker

2008-01-06 Thread Carlo Calica
On 1/6/08, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Under http://bugs.gobolinux.org/account_prefs_page.php one can set > 'Email on [x] {New,Change,etc}' which does the same. Have you tried to > use that option? I always receive emails on activities in the bug > tracker. > I have a bunch of

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [RFC][PATCH] Resources/Requirements

2008-01-06 Thread Carlo Calica
On 1/6/08, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/1/7, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I'd still want a warning if any action fails, as it could be critical > for the operation of the application that a group or user exist. Maybe > grep group/passwd for the group/user to erify

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [RFC][PATCH] Resources/Requirements

2008-01-06 Thread Carlo Calica
On 1/6/08, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Add a check so that get_next_system_id() doesn't loop above 1000? yep > A warning should be issued if adding the user/group fails. > One should be able to specify $HOME location for the user. > 'useradd' and 'groupadd' have to be wrapped wi

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [RFC][PATCH] Resources/Requirements

2008-01-06 Thread Carlo Calica
On 1/6/08, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 6, 2008 7:10 PM, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 1/6/08, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I ran some months ago into a case where the uid was

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [RFC][PATCH] Resources/Requirements

2008-01-06 Thread Carlo Calica
On 1/6/08, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I ran some months ago into a case where the uid was expected to be > 'x'. I think that was a cron application, I'm not sure. Anyway, having > the option there is good. > Sounds broken. > About conflicts, both useradd and groupadd fails

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [RFC][PATCH] Resources/Requirements

2008-01-06 Thread Carlo Calica
On 1/6/08, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I believe this is enough at least for the most common cases. I didn't > cover cross-compiling in this implementation, but that can come later > as needed. Comments? > Looks good. Do you have an example where a specific uid/gid is needed

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Announce 014 LiveFlash

2008-01-04 Thread Carlo Calica
On 1/4/08, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 3, 2008 10:32 PM, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, it's was being reset in StartLiveCD, line 54. I've just commited > a fix that won't change the behavior in the LiveCD and that mig

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Announce 014 LiveFlash

2008-01-03 Thread Carlo Calica
On 1/3/08, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 2, 2008 1:49 PM, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes, that makes sense. We can start to set that in the next kernel recipe. > I put it in the bug tracker: 236 > > I believe Hisham wanted

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Call for a GoboLinux 014 postmortem discussion on IRC

2008-01-03 Thread Carlo Calica
On 1/3/08, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Carlo Calica" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Another thought. Once we set a day/time, lets make it a recurring > > event. Say every week (heheh) with first of the month being more > > important, then th

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Call for a GoboLinux 014 postmortem discussion on IRC

2008-01-03 Thread Carlo Calica
On 1/3/08, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Daniele Maccari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > > Btw, even if I'm neither a developer nor a long seasoned recipe > > committer, I'd like to be there, just to partecipate somehow. [...] > > I'd also like to be there (19Z is often fine here - that's

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Call for a GoboLinux 014 postmortem discussion on IRC

2008-01-03 Thread Carlo Calica
On 1/3/08, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How about we try setting a day first. Then we can home into a time > once that is take care of. Are weekends best? Maybe Sat night so it > would be Sun morning for Michael. > > For myself, weekend/weekday doesn

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Call for a GoboLinux 014 postmortem discussion on IRC

2008-01-03 Thread Carlo Calica
On 1/2/08, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > See why I didn't want to do it late in the night? I guess my brain > does not function 100% after a certain time. :) Seconds after hitting > send, I just realized the scheduling problem is even trickier than I > thought: Michael Homer is in Ne

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Announce 014 LiveFlash

2008-01-02 Thread Carlo Calica
On 1/2/08, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/2/08, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > My first attempt failed because the SD card I used as media wasn't > formatted properly. It had been formatted by my digital camera, and > the part

[gobolinux-devel] Announce 014 LiveFlash

2008-01-02 Thread Carlo Calica
Hot on the heels of the 014 LiveCD release, I'd like to announce the 014 LiveFlash release. Ok not a full release but an alpha. First you need the ISO for the LiveCD. Then you need: http://www.calica.com/gobolinux/goboflash-0.1.zip You'll also need a 1GB or larger flash drive. Instructions: 1

Re: [gobolinux-devel] iso.gobolinux.org

2008-01-01 Thread Carlo Calica
On 1/1/08, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/1/08, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Thanks for the heads up, and sorry about the mess (I should have > > gotten the ISO uploaded to all mirrors prior to announcing it, etc., > >

Re: [gobolinux-devel] iso.gobolinux.org

2008-01-01 Thread Carlo Calica
On 1/1/08, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks for the heads up, and sorry about the mess (I should have > gotten the ISO uploaded to all mirrors prior to announcing it, etc., > but I didn't want to delay it even more -- I think we can handle the > initial load in the servers we'v

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [gobolinux-users] $pythonpath

2007-11-27 Thread Carlo Calica
On 11/14/07, Giambattista Bloisi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > My problem was yet another I wanted python to scan for pth file that were in > /System/Links/Libraries/python2.5/site-packages/ because some python modules > (PyGObject) > installed there .pth files in the hope they were actually scan

Re: [gobolinux-devel] KDE 4

2007-11-26 Thread Carlo Calica
On 11/24/07, Giambattista Bloisi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > I'm working on recipes for KDE 4. I installed it successfully on my > system anyway before submitting Recipes I'm concerned about a few issues > I found. > > The first problem is that KDE 4 is based on cmake. AFAIK at the m

Re: [gobolinux-devel] GoboLinux 014 snapshot 20071010

2007-10-17 Thread Carlo Calica
On 10/17/07, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > To be honest, "laziness", mostly. When I'm in a hurry to fix some bug > or get something to work it's usually quicker to use sudo than to > divert my focus and go through Compile and try to figure out what's > wrong. That said, any fixes/p

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [gobolinux-users] Udev errors

2007-09-20 Thread Carlo Calica
On 9/16/07, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Diverging to a related topic: I think we need a way so I can commit > those recipes (to let us have proper versioning) without breaking > people's systems when they use Freshen and friends. I understand > Gentoo has masked ebuilds, most distr

Re: [gobolinux-devel] RFC - Draft for a script to check what depends on an application

2007-09-20 Thread Carlo Calica
Seems fine. On 9/20/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have written a small script (see below) to find what applications > are dependant on a given application. Before I commit it I'd like some > feedback, if there are things I can change and make better (or > differently). > > -- >

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [gobolinux-users] Haskell Cabal build type?

2007-07-17 Thread Carlo Calica
On 7/17/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael wrote: > > Isaac wrote: > > > The naming scheme... "RubyGems-rubyqt" would look like any other program > > > name, should there be some more distinctive punctuation like > > > "RubyGems:rubyqt" (... _is_ that more distinctive?)? Al

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [gobolinux-users] Haskell Cabal build type?

2007-07-16 Thread Carlo Calica
On 7/16/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A very vague thought: maybe what we need is a way to "talk" to other > package managers, to have a bridge between our management/dependency > system, and theirs. Perhaps implemented as a plugin-like system. > Thinking out loud: > > If a dep

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [gobolinux-users] KDE/QT related compiles failing

2007-07-16 Thread Carlo Calica
On 7/16/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/16/07, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Do you mean from "make install" or PostInstall? I would argue that > > "make install" shouldn't alter passwd/shadow/

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [gobolinux-users] Haskell Cabal build type?

2007-07-16 Thread Carlo Calica
On 7/15/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There have been problems in the past with the configuration of Perl, > but I think things are now mostly settled on how to put Perl modules > in the GoboLinux tree. Cabal has been mentioned here before, but a > practical problem was that

Re: [gobolinux-devel] [gobolinux-users] KDE/QT related compiles failing

2007-07-16 Thread Carlo Calica
On 7/14/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/7/07, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > That is true. Moving Compile to something like ChrootCompile is > > definitely a good goal. In this instance, the desired Qt (3 or 4) > >

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Status of 014?

2007-07-16 Thread Carlo Calica
On 7/15/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > While it's too late in the process to implement now, may I make the > > following suggestions for 015? > > 1. Clear roadmap. Use the wiki for this. Once 014 is released, announce > > on > > the forums and mailing lists that s

Re: [gobolinux-devel] "Defragmenting" the LiveCD

2007-06-21 Thread Carlo Calica
On 6/20/07, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/20/07, MLA-Gobo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > How can we make the release process easier? > > How about appointing someone as release manager? It seems as though > > currently everyone does a little here, a little there, wit

[gobolinux-devel] gobo.calica.com IP transition

2007-06-19 Thread Carlo Calica
My ISP is changing my IP address. Let me know if you notice any problems. -- Carlo J. Calica ___ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel

Re: [gobolinux-devel] OT: help with crosscompiling

2007-06-19 Thread Carlo Calica
On 6/19/07, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a friend that wants to start learning programming with Nasal > (http://plausible.org/nasal), but he's using windows. Is there anyone > here who has possibility to compile a win binary of Nasal (latest CVS) > for him? I don't have the

Re: [gobolinux-devel] "Defragmenting" the LiveCD

2007-06-19 Thread Carlo Calica
On 6/17/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/16/07, MLA-Gobo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't have any evidence to support this, but the fact that we're > using several squashfs files may be the cause of the slowness -- > accessing several squashfs files means the drive has

Re: [gobolinux-devel] ACPI=off on new RC iso

2007-06-11 Thread Carlo Calica
On 6/11/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 22:45:29 +0200, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Just wondering if it'd be possible to remove the ACPI=off from the ISO > > boot params? All of my modern machines won&#x

[gobolinux-devel] ACPI=off on new RC iso

2007-06-11 Thread Carlo Calica
Just wondering if it'd be possible to remove the ACPI=off from the ISO boot params? All of my modern machines won't boot with it. Maybe make a "no acpi" option in isolinux? -- Carlo J. Calica ___ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobo

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Status of 'Dependencies' script

2007-05-28 Thread Carlo Calica
On 5/28/07, André Detsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/28/07, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/14/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Any updates on this? > > I would say Dependencies scripts should

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Status of 'Dependencies' script

2007-05-27 Thread Carlo Calica
On 3/14/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/14/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I noticed that Dependencies still lives in Scripts. However it's > > broken (http://bugs.gobolinux.org/view.php?id=94). Should it be > > considered deprecated, in favour of GenBuil

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Dependencies

2007-05-27 Thread Carlo Calica
On 5/27/07, Isaac Dupree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Carlo Calica wrote: > > Testing the _version_ requirements is probably more difficult since > things can break in subtle ways with the wrong version, but at least it > could complain if the _build process_ ends

Re: [gobolinux-devel] USE flags & Xorg

2007-05-27 Thread Carlo Calica
On 5/6/07, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/7/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 07 May 2007 00:34:00 +0200, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Ok, I think we are converging: > > > > > Yes, it doesn't look better... ;) > > Ok, read through the whole thread.

[gobolinux-devel] Ping any mails I should look at.

2007-05-26 Thread Carlo Calica
I'm slowly going through an email backlog. Please forward any message you want me to look at. thanks. PS How far back should I go? -- Carlo J. Calica ___ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mai

Re: [gobolinux-devel] Dependencies (was: USE flags & Xorg)

2007-05-26 Thread Carlo Calica
On 5/5/07, Isaac Dupree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Noticing: > One important use of forcing an install attempt despite unmatched > dependencies is to check if those are indeed (still) needed dependencies. > That's great for automaticed testing. Makes sure libraries are mininal enough. > Often

Re: [gobolinux-devel] AutoPatch tool?

2007-05-26 Thread Carlo Calica
On 5/26/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No, there isn't anything like that yet. Just a few tips, if you're > going to write it yourself: > - Please use the Scripts template, as seen in > /Programs/Scripts/Current/bin/TemplateScript > - Use the $EDITOR variable instead of

[gobolinux-devel] OpenJDK Info

2007-05-18 Thread Carlo Calica
Here's some info I came across regarding Fedora's OpenJDK plans: http://fitzsim.org/blog/?p=17 Some highlights: * OpenJDK is a Sun trademark so they're calling their package "IcedTea" * Goals are building with free software, test without bin plugs, replace bin plugs. * temp site icedtea.classpat

Re: [gobolinux-devel] /etc/group

2007-04-27 Thread Carlo Calica
On 4/26/07, Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:02:11 -0700 > > But adding groups per-user is almost what you get by using ACLs. > True. > > Like you, I tend to think about large system, often much larger than > practically acceptable, and also very hetero

Re: [gobolinux-devel] /etc/group

2007-04-25 Thread Carlo Calica
On 4/25/07, Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:00:07 -0300 > "Lucas C. Villa Real" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Is that really needed, as we have the 'users' group common to > > everyone? I would vote for removing it, but I'd just like to hear your > >

Re: [gobolinux-devel] /etc/group

2007-04-24 Thread Carlo Calica
On 4/24/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > While checking the bugs reported by Peter I noticed that useradd (the > one from Shadow package, invoked by AddUser) automatically creates a > group with the same name as the username supplied in the command line. > Is that rea

  1   2   3   >